메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
전연희 (성신여자대학교)
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제23권 제1호
발행연도
2010.4
수록면
125 - 151 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In his recent play The Pillowman (2003), Martin McDonagh as an artist actively started to communicate with the world by branching out from concerns related to his ethnic identity to political concerns with a global point of view. McDonagh employs storytelling to protest against violence, oppression, cruelty and fear throughout the world. His political allegory shows common ground with young British writers in the 1990s. In The Pillowman, he successfully shows his faith in radical forms of storytelling that highlights writer-reader conflict and refuses to pay attention to traditional mainstream text structure; the effect is a dramatic twisting of the existing traditions of art and ethical /moral sensibilities.
McDonagh allegorizes the conflict between macro-discourse of society which represents the power that controls storytelling and micro-discourse of individuals represented by the conflict between Katurian and Tuposki. Throughout, McDonagh carefully examines the significant role that methodology plays in artistic expression and the importance of an artists’ social commitment. His approach also emphasizes the conflicts that arises from the process in which the ‘first text’ of an artist’s creation transfers to the ‘second text’ interpreted by readers. Additionally, he makes efforts to maintain a constant relationship with the world by showing open endings that could be completed only by readers. In The Pillowman we can see that McDonagh, who has been criticized for being ‘subservient’, ‘sarcastic’ and ‘provocative’ in his work, truly desires to open up the communication lines between the world and the stage. High expectations are justifiably being held about McDonagh’s artistic evolution. As he starts to step beyond from local and ethnic problems to exchange and communicate with the world, he effectively explores the meaning of storytelling and the conflicts between a writer, the producer of storytelling, and a receiver, the interpreter of stories.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가면서
Ⅱ. 카투리안(Katurian)의 스토리텔링: 전통적 내러티브의 변형과 재창조
Ⅲ. 카투리안 대 투폴스키: 마이크로 담론과 매크로 담론의 대립
Ⅳ. 나오면서
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-842-002943330