지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study started from questions that Goryeo celadon, flourishing in Goryeo period and trending in Asia at the same time, had been suddenly attracting academic attention to both Korea and Japan scholars in modern times, and revived as a collection of artifacts and reproduction with exhibitions. It has important influence of the concern and collection of Goryeo celadon, and reading of the text in the late Joseon dynasty on the process of knowing the reason why people are reminded the relationship of the equation, ‘Goryeo’=‘Feisek(翡色)’.
There are various historical documents and literary records reveal recognition on Goryeo celadon. Among them, manuscripts of Gaolitujing(高麗圖經), recorded a itinerary of country messenger of Northern Sung who had come to Goryeo in 1123, written by Xu Jing(徐兢), is thought to have contributed to give information of Feisek-celadon.
There are not many information of Goryeo ceramics in Gaolitujing. It is no more than about 10 documents including earthenware and celadon. However, This is very important historical document to quate that writing year is sure and also the purpose and circumstance are clear. Because currently known historical record of Goryeo period is not many, actually it is very rare. And the types and materials of various vessels described in Gaolitujing have provided crucial evidence to study of the craft history occasionally.
But in the meantime celadon-related documents of Gaolitujing have been quoted fragmentarily, so far there are no examples that consider the entire article collectively. Furthermore, it has never been studied how Gaolitujing has been understood along with its historicity. Already there can not be found the evidence that the Goryeo themselves called celadon ‘Feisek(翡色)’ in early Goryeo period in other internal and external records except Gaolitujing.
However, It is very interesting that commenting Gaolitujing in histories and anthologies of Joseon period, through this document, the memories of Goryeo celadon had been continued constantly. In the existing opinion that perception of ‘Goryeo Feisek’ was derived from modern Japanese interest in Goryeo culture and domestic academic interest in history of Goryeo, futhermore it can be ascertained that Gaolitujing was read through the repeatedly reading, copying, garnering of various histories and anthologies of Joseon period. Particularly, three different types of copies in libraries of Ewha womans university and Korea University, Seoul national university Kyujanggak(奎章閣) were investigated in the process for the first time. Therefore significance of Gaolitujing as a text that helps better understanding Goryeo can be known.
It is highly likely that the various information written about Goryeo in Gaolitujing has been provided a rigid point of view on Goryeo consistently and repeatedly. Especially the information of celadon was quoted by scholars as being reconstructed the contents of Goryeo sa(高麗史), Xiuzhonggin(袖中錦), and Gaolitujing. As a result, the interests and ideas of Feisek-celadon was not formed in Modern times, rather the memories through the text and the actual object were linked together throughout the Joseon Dynasty, specially in the late Joseon Dynasty when books and relics were introduced rapidly from China, it had become firmly.
There are various historical documents and literary records reveal recognition on Goryeo celadon. Among them, manuscripts of Gaolitujing(高麗圖經), recorded a itinerary of country messenger of Northern Sung who had come to Goryeo in 1123, written by Xu Jing(徐兢), is thought to have contributed to give information of Feisek-celadon.
There are not many information of Goryeo ceramics in Gaolitujing. It is no more than about 10 documents including earthenware and celadon. However, This is very important historical document to quate that writing year is sure and also the purpose and circumstance are clear. Because currently known historical record of Goryeo period is not many, actually it is very rare. And the types and materials of various vessels described in Gaolitujing have provided crucial evidence to study of the craft history occasionally.
But in the meantime celadon-related documents of Gaolitujing have been quoted fragmentarily, so far there are no examples that consider the entire article collectively. Furthermore, it has never been studied how Gaolitujing has been understood along with its historicity. Already there can not be found the evidence that the Goryeo themselves called celadon ‘Feisek(翡色)’ in early Goryeo period in other internal and external records except Gaolitujing.
However, It is very interesting that commenting Gaolitujing in histories and anthologies of Joseon period, through this document, the memories of Goryeo celadon had been continued constantly. In the existing opinion that perception of ‘Goryeo Feisek’ was derived from modern Japanese interest in Goryeo culture and domestic academic interest in history of Goryeo, futhermore it can be ascertained that Gaolitujing was read through the repeatedly reading, copying, garnering of various histories and anthologies of Joseon period. Particularly, three different types of copies in libraries of Ewha womans university and Korea University, Seoul national university Kyujanggak(奎章閣) were investigated in the process for the first time. Therefore significance of Gaolitujing as a text that helps better understanding Goryeo can be known.
It is highly likely that the various information written about Goryeo in Gaolitujing has been provided a rigid point of view on Goryeo consistently and repeatedly. Especially the information of celadon was quoted by scholars as being reconstructed the contents of Goryeo sa(高麗史), Xiuzhonggin(袖中錦), and Gaolitujing. As a result, the interests and ideas of Feisek-celadon was not formed in Modern times, rather the memories through the text and the actual object were linked together throughout the Joseon Dynasty, specially in the late Joseon Dynasty when books and relics were introduced rapidly from China, it had become firmly.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조선의 史書에 기록된 고려청자
Ⅲ. 문집에 나타난 고려청자와 ‘비색’에 대한 인식
Ⅳ. 조선 후기 고려청자에 대한 외국인들의 관심
Ⅴ. 고려 관련 텍스트의 讀解와 유포
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
11세기말-12세기 전반 高麗靑瓷에 보이는 中國陶瓷의 영향
미술사학
2007 .08
-
Afterimage from Goryeo celadon
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2019 .12
-
高麗靑磁에 보이는 金屬器皿의 影響
미술사연구
2009 .12
-
북한지역 고려 후기 금동불 연구 : 중대형 금동불을 중심으로
미술사연구
2018 .12
-
고려시대 茶文化와 靑瓷 : 청자 茶具를 중심으로
미술사논단
2007 .06
-
漕運과 도자생산, 그리고 유통 : 海底引揚 고려도자를 중심으로
미술사연구
2008 .12
-
고려청자 문양의 詩 · 畵적 요소와 도상의 독창성
미술사학
2014 .08
-
고려 공예품에 보이는 宋代 ‘倣古器物’의 영향
미술사연구
2011 .12
-
高麗時代 鼎形靑瓷 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2006 .12
-
高麗時代 禁制와 工匠制를 통해 본 金屬象嵌技法의 양상
미술사논단
2013 .06
-
고유섭의 도자인식 : 고려시대 靑瓷를 중심으로
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2005 .12
-
高麗 中期 輸入 中國白磁의 系統과 性格
미술사연구
2011 .12
-
高麗末 朝鮮初 四天王圖像 硏究
미술사연구
2008 .12
-
근대 유럽에서 한국도자에 대한 인식 변화와 그 배경
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
-
11-12세기 粗質靑磁의 계통과 편년
미술사학
2004 .08
-
고려 초기 회화의 조명
미술사논단
2019 .06
-
고려시대 매병의 용례와 조형적 특징
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2010 .12
-
일제강점기 요지조사와 고려청자 연구의 의미
미술사학
2017 .02
-
고려후기 마애불에 대한 고찰 : 조성시기와 특징을 중심으로
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2019 .03
-
송대 불교조각의 고려 유입과 선택
미술사연구
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-650-003382968