지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Based on an analysis of the Hoeni sibi(懷尼是非, arguments between Song Siy?l and Yun Ch?ng) debate, with the main focus being on Yun S?n'g? and Yun Ch?ng's assertions made in response to those advanced by Song Siy?l and the Patriarch faction(Noron), this study seeks to prove the following facts.
First, although the Hoeni sibi debate involved many facts and points of contention, it was in essence a conflict over basic thoughts and policies. From the standpoint of philosophy, the Hoeni sibi debate was a conflict between Yun S?n/g?'s relativization of Neo - Confucianism and Song Siy?l's Neo - Confucian Orthodoxy, the latter of which was regarded as impeding Yun Ch?ng's Silsim Sirhsk (實心實學, Pragmatic Practical Learning). From the standpoint of policy, the Hoeni sibi debate was a conflict between socio - economics reforms designed to actualize the Great Cause of Conquering the North(Pukp?l tae?i) and the moralistic desire to absolutize the notion of Taemy?ng ?iriron(對明義理論, moral justice toward Ming).
Second, the Hoeni sibi debate was also a conflict between the progressive and conservative forces. The conflicts between the advocates of Chuhwaron(主和論, make peace with the Qing) and Ch'?khwaron (斥和論, reject the Qing), which continued unabated from the reign of King Injo, were in essence clashes between the progressive and conservative camps. However, while Yun Hwang, who belonged to the Ch'?khwaron faction, accepted the notion of Py?nt'ongron(變通論, reform theory) during the reign of King Injo, Yun S?n'g? accepted that of P'abungdangron(破朋黨論, removal of factional politics) during the reign of King Hyojong. Meanwhile, Yun Ch?ng, who sought to relativize the notions of Ch'?khweron and ?iriron, positively accepted the concept of Saseron(事勢論, consideration of the situation) during the reign of King Sukchong. As such, the Yun family's gradual approach to the Chuhwaron can be regarded as having signified their progression from conservative to progressive in terms of their perception of reality as well as policy. On the contrary, Song Siy?l became even more conservative following his attempts to absolutize the notions of Ch'?khwaron and ?iriron.
Third, the Hoeni sibi debate was also a rivalry between the T'angp 'y?ngnon(蕩平論, theory of impartiality) and anti T'angp y?ngnon forces. T'angp'y?ngnon emerged as a result of the efforts made by government officials and Confucian scholars who sought to not only draw up new policies and institutions that could overcome the domestic and international crises after the two Manchu invasions of 1627 and 1636, but also to bring these to the political center. In this regard, it is important to note that Yun Ch?ng's family was actively involved in this process.
Fourth, although it would have been impossible for him to have any awareness of the Sirhak(實學, Practical Learning) that emerged during late Chos?n, Yun Ch?ng's Pragmatic Practical Learning in fact shared many similarities with the latter. This connection is evident in Yun's epilogue to Yu Hy?ngw?n's "Pangye surok(磻溪隨錄, Essays on Social Reform)".
As such, we can see that the conflicts between Yun Ch?ng and Song Siy?l were also conflicts between adherents of Practical Learning and Neo - Confucianism. As the political theory of the adherents of Practical Learning was given form in the T'angp y?ngnon, it was only natural that the conflict between these two camps evolved into one between the proponents of T'angp'y?ngnon and those who opposed it.
Hoeni sibi began during the reign of King Sukchong at the end of 17th century and moved beyond the families of Song Siy?l and Yun Ch?ng during the era of T'angp'y?ng politics in the 18th century. This denouement can be regarded as the result of the fact that at the core of the Hoeni sibi debate lay the differences in thoughts and policies, as well as the conflicts, between the conservative and progressive factions. In other words, this can be regarded as having been a conflict between new ideas and thoughts and older ones that raged during the period that saw the disintegration of feudal society.
First, although the Hoeni sibi debate involved many facts and points of contention, it was in essence a conflict over basic thoughts and policies. From the standpoint of philosophy, the Hoeni sibi debate was a conflict between Yun S?n/g?'s relativization of Neo - Confucianism and Song Siy?l's Neo - Confucian Orthodoxy, the latter of which was regarded as impeding Yun Ch?ng's Silsim Sirhsk (實心實學, Pragmatic Practical Learning). From the standpoint of policy, the Hoeni sibi debate was a conflict between socio - economics reforms designed to actualize the Great Cause of Conquering the North(Pukp?l tae?i) and the moralistic desire to absolutize the notion of Taemy?ng ?iriron(對明義理論, moral justice toward Ming).
Second, the Hoeni sibi debate was also a conflict between the progressive and conservative forces. The conflicts between the advocates of Chuhwaron(主和論, make peace with the Qing) and Ch'?khwaron (斥和論, reject the Qing), which continued unabated from the reign of King Injo, were in essence clashes between the progressive and conservative camps. However, while Yun Hwang, who belonged to the Ch'?khwaron faction, accepted the notion of Py?nt'ongron(變通論, reform theory) during the reign of King Injo, Yun S?n'g? accepted that of P'abungdangron(破朋黨論, removal of factional politics) during the reign of King Hyojong. Meanwhile, Yun Ch?ng, who sought to relativize the notions of Ch'?khweron and ?iriron, positively accepted the concept of Saseron(事勢論, consideration of the situation) during the reign of King Sukchong. As such, the Yun family's gradual approach to the Chuhwaron can be regarded as having signified their progression from conservative to progressive in terms of their perception of reality as well as policy. On the contrary, Song Siy?l became even more conservative following his attempts to absolutize the notions of Ch'?khwaron and ?iriron.
Third, the Hoeni sibi debate was also a rivalry between the T'angp 'y?ngnon(蕩平論, theory of impartiality) and anti T'angp y?ngnon forces. T'angp'y?ngnon emerged as a result of the efforts made by government officials and Confucian scholars who sought to not only draw up new policies and institutions that could overcome the domestic and international crises after the two Manchu invasions of 1627 and 1636, but also to bring these to the political center. In this regard, it is important to note that Yun Ch?ng's family was actively involved in this process.
Fourth, although it would have been impossible for him to have any awareness of the Sirhak(實學, Practical Learning) that emerged during late Chos?n, Yun Ch?ng's Pragmatic Practical Learning in fact shared many similarities with the latter. This connection is evident in Yun's epilogue to Yu Hy?ngw?n's "Pangye surok(磻溪隨錄, Essays on Social Reform)".
As such, we can see that the conflicts between Yun Ch?ng and Song Siy?l were also conflicts between adherents of Practical Learning and Neo - Confucianism. As the political theory of the adherents of Practical Learning was given form in the T'angp y?ngnon, it was only natural that the conflict between these two camps evolved into one between the proponents of T'angp'y?ngnon and those who opposed it.
Hoeni sibi began during the reign of King Sukchong at the end of 17th century and moved beyond the families of Song Siy?l and Yun Ch?ng during the era of T'angp'y?ng politics in the 18th century. This denouement can be regarded as the result of the fact that at the core of the Hoeni sibi debate lay the differences in thoughts and policies, as well as the conflicts, between the conservative and progressive factions. In other words, this can be regarded as having been a conflict between new ideas and thoughts and older ones that raged during the period that saw the disintegration of feudal society.
#회니시비(懷尼是非)
#송시열(宋時烈)
#윤황(尹惶)
#윤선거(尹宣擧)
#윤증(尹拯)
#변통론(變通論)
#파붕당론(破朋黨論)
#'실심(實心) 실학(實學)'
#사세론(事勢論)
#탕평론(蕩平論)
#Hoeni sibi(Arguments between Song Siyŏl and Yun Chŭng)
#Song Siyŏl
#Yun Hwang
#Yun Sŏn'gŏ
#Yun Chŭng
#Pyŏnt'ongron(reform theory)
#P'abungdangron(removal of factional politics)
#Silsim Sirhak(Pragmatic Practical Learning)
#Saseron(consideration of situation)
#T'ango'yŏngnon(theory of impartiality)
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 尹宣擧ㆍ尹拯 父子의 ‘擬書’와 破朋黨論
Ⅲ. 事勢論과 蕩平論
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기 사상사에서 명재 윤증의 위상
민족문화
2011 .06
-
Myŏngjae Yun Chŭng’s Posthumous Works
Korea Journal
1974 .02
-
The Understanding of Yun Dong-ju in Three East Asian Countries
Korea Journal
2012 .09
-
‘緣雨堂’ 海南尹氏家의 學問과 藝術
지방사와 지방문화
2003 .05
-
홍무정운과 몽고자운의 관계연구-창제목적과 성격상의 異와 同, 그리고 韻書의 운명을 중심으로-
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
윤대녕 소설과 신화적 상상력
우리문학연구
2003 .12
-
Yun Ch’i-ho and the Independence Club
Korea Journal
1990 .10
-
懷尼是非의 論點과 名分論
한국사연구
1985 .03
-
Three Poems by Yun Dong-ju
Korea Journal
1965 .09
-
호남남인 윤선도의 관계망
민족문화연구
2018 .01
-
History and Personality in the Diary of Yun Ch`i-ho
Korea Journal
1975 .12
-
윤복진의 동요곡집 연구 : 『물새발자옥』을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2013 .08
-
靑皐 尹愹의 문예활동과 회화 연구
역사민속학
2014 .07
-
윤석중 생애와 문학에 대한 재검토 : 아버지 윤덕병(尹德炳)과 관련하여
아동청소년문학연구
2009 .06
-
仁祖代 前半 정치적 갈등과 朋黨論 : 李貴와 金瑬의 대립을 중심으로
역사와경계
2006 .09
-
윤동주 시 연구
한국문학논총
2002 .01
-
Yun Sok-Jung`s VERSES FOR THE YOUNG
Korea Journal
1966 .05
-
시인의 탄생 : 영화 『동주』를 대상으로
우리말글
2017 .06
-
Yun Ch’i-ho in America : The Training of a Korean Patriot in the South, 1888-1893
Korea Journal
1978 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-003346755