메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 아프리카연구소 Asian Journal of African Studies 아프리카 硏究 제18호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
247 - 294 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Between late 1991 and late 1993, South Africa's main negotiating partners, led by the National party government and the ANC, agreed upon a set of institutions for the remainder of the transition, during which new, fully democratic institutions were to be created ; these two anchored the emerging core of moderate parties that held South Africa's fragile center together. This period transition, too, was tense and turbulent, wracked with political violence, economic decline and social malaise, and fierce competition among myriad protagonists for political power.
With the unbanning of liberation organizations in February 1990, the ANC assumed a leading role in the negotiation process, acting as a counterpart to the ruling National party. As it became clear that the ANC was likely to head a new government, civil society organizations began to assess their relationship to it. In the 1980s many of them worked together with the UDF, and considered themselves as allies of the ANC. However, relationships that were taken for granted before 2 February 1990 would undergo transformation during the period.
In this thesis, I describe the ideological orientation and interest base of the major parties with reference to their preferences regarding the institutions of a post-apartheid polity. An analysis of the politics of institutional choice, that is the power relationships, is also made. An understanding of the various institutions that were preferred to guide the transition - that is whether for example a 'constituent assembly' or a 'multiparty negotiating forum' would draft the new constitution - requires a prior understanding of the regime model each party or stakeholder was striving towards. The ideologies, interests, and institutional choice preferences of the political actors must therefor! e be considered prior to their preferences for the transitional institutions to guide the formal negotiation.
The main focus of this thesis so far has been on the role of pacts during a negotiated transition to democracy. If pacting is successful, this makes possible the holding of the first democratic elections.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Logic of the Main Political Actors with Regard to Institutional Choices for a New Political System
3. Institutional Choices for a New Political System Through CODESA
4. Compromise and Reopening of Negotiation Through MPNF
5. The Prospects for Democratic Consolidation
〈References〉
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-309-002231708