지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is to find out the background of martial law in Yosu-rebellion and the role of court martial as process of restoration of order by force.
The proclamation of martial law in the mid of Yosu-rebellion has firstly related to key officer’s past experiences in Manchurian army and Japan army in addition to the direct experiences of martial law proclamation by regional commander while Korea was under the US military rulings. Baekil Kim was former Manchurian army. Regional commanders of Manchurian army proclaimed martial law over all over the Manchurian area as a tactic. The Korean army was trained in a US army style under US military rulings. All field manual of Korean army used in training session was prepared and taught by US army. Under such circumstances, Korean army officers have experienced martial law and its progress in Oct 1946, which was executed by US army. Experiences of martial law in Manchurian army and that of Oct 1946 in Korea were proclaimed ‘exceptionally and tactically’ by temporary commander. The martial law of 22nd of Oct, 1948 was proclaimed exceptionally by Baekil Kim, which was ratified by Cabinet meeting on 25th of Oct, 1948. The basis of those are intelligence report by US advisor group and draft of ‘martial law’ submitted in December 1948 by the Military of National Defence.
The contents of court martial under martial law was investigated through the related court rulings. These court rulings are solely unearthed by the present writer. There was materials regarding Jeju 4·3-rebellion, however it was difficult to know the situation of court martial of Yosu rebellion as there no presence of relevant material was known.
The document is about the second court martial in Suncheon, which was ruling on civilians. It was found that over the half of the accused were freed from arbitrary arrest based on court rulings and newspaper as well. However, over half of those who are decided to be guilty were condemned to death or life imprisonment. The documents also have information on age, sex, region, occupation of the accused. Occupations are peasants, railroaders, students, teachers in order. It also has revealed how they were executed. After court ruling of execution on 14th of Oct and order for execution on 24th of Oct, those 44 persons who were sentenced to death, were shot to death and cremated on 24th of Nov in Shogok dong hill near to court place. It prove that those who were in prison with regard to Yosu rebellion were shot to death right after outbreak of Korean war.
Such court martial as process of restoration of order by force was used as course to justify massacre committed before courtmartial, divide a red and good citizen, and create new situation that it is not guilty to kill people who are regarded as reds.
The martial law of 1949 was discussed and enacted under the circumstances of superior position of Seungman Lee’s regime through triumph in civil war such as Yosu rebellion and Jeju 4·3 rebellion and assassination of Gu Kim and collapse of young group in constitutional assembly. The establishment of martial law is a process of ratification on unfair and brutal actions taken in suppression of Yosu rebellion and Jeju 4·3 rebellion. Such legislation of martial law works as historical mechanism which changes unfairness and brutal ness to fairness and standard. It prevent from raising issues regarding violence of nation which create the exceptional state against people’s fundamental rights.
The meaning and influences that Yosu rebellion and Jeju 4·3 rebellion has affected martial law legislation is to be discussed as future task.
The proclamation of martial law in the mid of Yosu-rebellion has firstly related to key officer’s past experiences in Manchurian army and Japan army in addition to the direct experiences of martial law proclamation by regional commander while Korea was under the US military rulings. Baekil Kim was former Manchurian army. Regional commanders of Manchurian army proclaimed martial law over all over the Manchurian area as a tactic. The Korean army was trained in a US army style under US military rulings. All field manual of Korean army used in training session was prepared and taught by US army. Under such circumstances, Korean army officers have experienced martial law and its progress in Oct 1946, which was executed by US army. Experiences of martial law in Manchurian army and that of Oct 1946 in Korea were proclaimed ‘exceptionally and tactically’ by temporary commander. The martial law of 22nd of Oct, 1948 was proclaimed exceptionally by Baekil Kim, which was ratified by Cabinet meeting on 25th of Oct, 1948. The basis of those are intelligence report by US advisor group and draft of ‘martial law’ submitted in December 1948 by the Military of National Defence.
The contents of court martial under martial law was investigated through the related court rulings. These court rulings are solely unearthed by the present writer. There was materials regarding Jeju 4·3-rebellion, however it was difficult to know the situation of court martial of Yosu rebellion as there no presence of relevant material was known.
The document is about the second court martial in Suncheon, which was ruling on civilians. It was found that over the half of the accused were freed from arbitrary arrest based on court rulings and newspaper as well. However, over half of those who are decided to be guilty were condemned to death or life imprisonment. The documents also have information on age, sex, region, occupation of the accused. Occupations are peasants, railroaders, students, teachers in order. It also has revealed how they were executed. After court ruling of execution on 14th of Oct and order for execution on 24th of Oct, those 44 persons who were sentenced to death, were shot to death and cremated on 24th of Nov in Shogok dong hill near to court place. It prove that those who were in prison with regard to Yosu rebellion were shot to death right after outbreak of Korean war.
Such court martial as process of restoration of order by force was used as course to justify massacre committed before courtmartial, divide a red and good citizen, and create new situation that it is not guilty to kill people who are regarded as reds.
The martial law of 1949 was discussed and enacted under the circumstances of superior position of Seungman Lee’s regime through triumph in civil war such as Yosu rebellion and Jeju 4·3 rebellion and assassination of Gu Kim and collapse of young group in constitutional assembly. The establishment of martial law is a process of ratification on unfair and brutal actions taken in suppression of Yosu rebellion and Jeju 4·3 rebellion. Such legislation of martial law works as historical mechanism which changes unfairness and brutal ness to fairness and standard. It prevent from raising issues regarding violence of nation which create the exceptional state against people’s fundamental rights.
The meaning and influences that Yosu rebellion and Jeju 4·3 rebellion has affected martial law legislation is to be discussed as future task.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 계엄령의 발포
3. 즉결처형과 민간인에 대한 군사재판
5. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제헌국회의 계엄령 헌법화와 계엄법안의 차별화
한국사학보
2012 .11
-
전통무예와 군사사를 활용한 문화콘텐츠 개발 연구 : 수원 화성과 무예24기 중 마상무예(馬上武藝)를 중심으로
역사와실학
2012 .08
-
고려시대 군율의 구조와 그 성격
사학연구
2003 .03
-
한국전쟁기 북한의 점령지 재판과 정치범 처형
역사연구
2011 .12
-
18세기 淸州지역의 謀反ㆍ掛書 사건
역사와 담론
2008 .09
-
Ecological Reinterpretation of Sin as Rebellion against Creation
한국기독교신학논총
2007 .12
-
결혼이주여성의 문화적응 스트레스와 결혼만족도에 관한 연구 : 자아존중감의 매개효과를 중심으로
다문화와 평화
2012 .01
-
고구려 무예의 특성과 그 의미
역사민속학
2004 .06
-
국민의 무술인식에 대한 실태 및 전인적 인격형성화 방안
한국사상과 문화
2006 .01
-
여순사건과 국가폭력의 구조
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
잭 케이드 반란과 민중, 그리고 셰익스피어의 ‘급진주의’
고전 르네상스 영문학
2010 .01
-
5·18 항쟁의 배경과 참여세력 : 광주 지역 민주화운동세력을 중심으로
역사와현실
2013 .09
-
택견의 체계화에 미친 일본 유도의 영향
비교민속학
2006 .02
-
한국의 민간인 학살사건 재판연구 : 경주 내남면 학살사건 재판사례를 중심으로
한국사학보
2010 .05
-
‘홍경래 난’ 연구의 쟁점
한국인물사연구
2009 .03
-
Muyedobo T’ongji: Illustrated Survey of the Martial Arts
Korea Journal
1986 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-392-002306087