메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국도교문화학회 도교문화연구 道敎文化硏究 第17輯
발행연도
2002.11
수록면
131 - 169 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Various religious traditions in the world have their own unique view of religious scriptures. Generally, a religion such as Christianity, Islam or Judaism, emphasizing the revelation of the Absolute (Allah or God), attaches an utmost value to its scripture, Qur'an of Islam, in particular, possesses absolute value and authority itself. Such religion as described above deems its scripture(s) as records of revelation of the Absolute. On the other hand, scripture is construed as human text harboring human deliberation, not God's Words, in cases of such religions as Buddhism or Confucianism, which place more emphasis on the Individual (i.e. the sage)'s superb religious experience, deliberation and wisdom than the revelation of divine being, and exert efforts to turn valuable teachings of sages to deed in his or her religious(or daily) life. Accordingly, in this case, the interpretation of scriptures is relatively flexible when compared to the first mentioned religions as above. It should be further noted, in case of religious traditions such as Zen Buddhism, with a negative point of view against expression of the religious deliberation being expressed in a human language, As Scripture loses its authority along with devaluation of language. As seen above, it can be derived that authority of scripture may vary from a religion to a religion depending on levels of understanding as to the religious experiences and expressions thereof and is, furthermore, interlinked to view of language of the religion concerned. Moreover, attitude toward Scripture is closely linked to how each religion views a world and salvation.
The view of scripture, i.e. attitude toward authority of scripture or standpoint as to interpretation of scripture, varies from religious tradition to religious tradition. Even within the same religious tradition, the view of scripture may be determined by era and religious denominations. It is noteworthy that Taoism does not have standard view of scriptures itself. The characteristics of Taoism, i.e. a religion of interwoven complexity and high flexibility, are reflected on formation and understanding of its scripture. Taoist Canon(『道藏』), a massive accumulation of texts, is a collection of numerous texts with far-reaching diversity. All in all, scripture of Taoism may be characterized by diversity and flexibility.
It would be worthwhile to identify a common factor behind consolidation of numerous Taoist texts of such diversity into one. It can be derived that Taoist texts are based on the metaphysics and cosmology centered on Tao and Qi (i.e. Breath, or Energy). The cosmology, involving a process starting from Tao(i.e. the One, the matrix of the whole universe) to creation of a myriad of things via a medium of Qi serves a framework to build a fundamental structure for religious practices of Taoism. Taoist endeavors to revert the process of such creation (i.e. from a myriad of things to Tao) as part of effort to reach the mystical union with Tao. The mechanism involving creation of all things based on Tao and Qi and circulation thereof serves as a fundamental basis to support all the doctrines and facilitate religious practices of Taoism. As seen above, with a common theoretical framework, each denomination of Taoism documented its own texts and the view of scriptures during a particular time period while other denomination pursued its own way.
As a prime example, we can find two different views of taoist scripture as follows: First, a group of traditions, such as Shangqing Tradition, Lingbao Tradition and Celestial Masters Tradition, deems scripture to hale a divine origin and power. Such traditions recognize that scriptures are literal expressions of Tao, i.e. the Primordial Chaos of nondifferentiation, Hundun(混沌), and believe that scriptures are sacred things which manifest the Sacred itself and possess sacred power themselves. Absolute authority is granted to scriptures in cases of such traditions.
In contrast, a group of Inner Alchemy traditions(內丹道) such as Quanzhen Tradition(全眞敎) places heavier weight on a practical value of scriptures than absolute authority thereof. The underlying concept is that scripture is something that presents a gateway to Tao but distinguished from Tao due to its inherent limitations as it is structured in character letters of a human. In this regard, scripture may be treated as auxiliary means to accomplish religious goals. The practices of adepts are stressed more than reliance on teaching of scripture. As seen above, different attitudes toward scripture may be interlinked with understanding of character letters or languages. Furthermore, it may have an inter-linkage with understanding of salvation whether to be fulfilled via divine power or own efforts exerted by a human.
In conclusion, authority and status of Taoist texts differs from one to another, lacking consistency. In comparison with other religious traditions, Taoism permits free and flexible interpretation of scriptures. Free interpretation of scriptures even led to variation and recreation of scripture. Such tolerance shows flexibility of Taoism but may from time to time threaten identity of Taoism. Yet such tolerance was a driving power to produce Taoist thoughts in abundance. Taoist Cannon(『道藏』) can be compared to an colorful and splendid picture books, which visualize and actualize religious yearnings and desires of Taoists, mostly stemming from tolerance associated with Taoism.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 종교와 경전
Ⅲ. 중국의 ‘經’과 ‘經典’
Ⅳ. 도교에서의 경전
Ⅴ. 맺는말
【참고문헌】
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-240-002296178