지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I maintain that gasas (Seowangga, seungwonga, Sudoga, Simwooga, Nahkdoga etc.) are named not by Naong's own writing but by Naong's fame.
First, the literatures recording Naong's gasas have little authenticity and they are only literary works handed down orally.
Second, the latter period of Chosun dynasty (18th century) needed more those literary works than the final period of Koryo in terms of age.
Third, the levels of those literary works referred are below those of Naong's original works.
Fourth, as Naong was so famous, unidentified one named those literary works(presumedly written by Naong) after Naong.
However, In kwon-whan criticizes these opinions
First, he argues that the literatures have the name of Naong.
Second, the levels of literatures were adjusted to the readers.
Third, Koryo period needed those literatures.
Finally, there is no reason to pick the name of writer as Naong among other monks.
But there are obvious reasons that those literatures were not written by Naong.
First, there are lots of literary works that have no relations between authors and the contents in Korean literatures.
Second, Seowangga handed down orally was written down.
Third, the way of spiritual discipline in Seowangga is different from that of Nawang.
Fourth, there is difference between Sunjong and Jeongtojong.
Fifth, the paragraph written by Hamheoran(1376-1433) who was born later than Nawong reads in Seowangga.
In phases of times, Chamsun was popular at the end of Koryo but prayer was popular in the 18th century. And the 18th century needed Seowangga.
Compared with the levels of other works, Nawang's chinese poetry has high level than Seowangga and this is the other reason that Seowangga was not written by Nawong.
The reason to pick the name of Nawong among those of other monks was that he was famous and the masses liked him. That's why these gasas were not written by Nawong.
First, the literatures recording Naong's gasas have little authenticity and they are only literary works handed down orally.
Second, the latter period of Chosun dynasty (18th century) needed more those literary works than the final period of Koryo in terms of age.
Third, the levels of those literary works referred are below those of Naong's original works.
Fourth, as Naong was so famous, unidentified one named those literary works(presumedly written by Naong) after Naong.
However, In kwon-whan criticizes these opinions
First, he argues that the literatures have the name of Naong.
Second, the levels of literatures were adjusted to the readers.
Third, Koryo period needed those literatures.
Finally, there is no reason to pick the name of writer as Naong among other monks.
But there are obvious reasons that those literatures were not written by Naong.
First, there are lots of literary works that have no relations between authors and the contents in Korean literatures.
Second, Seowangga handed down orally was written down.
Third, the way of spiritual discipline in Seowangga is different from that of Nawang.
Fourth, there is difference between Sunjong and Jeongtojong.
Fifth, the paragraph written by Hamheoran(1376-1433) who was born later than Nawong reads in Seowangga.
In phases of times, Chamsun was popular at the end of Koryo but prayer was popular in the 18th century. And the 18th century needed Seowangga.
Compared with the levels of other works, Nawang's chinese poetry has high level than Seowangga and this is the other reason that Seowangga was not written by Nawong.
The reason to pick the name of Nawong among those of other monks was that he was famous and the masses liked him. That's why these gasas were not written by Nawong.
목차
1. 서언
2. 작자의 표기 시비
3. 나옹 작 부정의 근거
4. 작품의 수준
5. 시대적 필요성
6. 나옹 가탁의 문제
7. 또 다른 근거
8. 결언
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
懶翁의 붓다화에 대한 고찰
사학연구
2014 .09
-
懶翁作 <西往歌> 一考
한국사상과 문화
2008 .01
-
나옹과 오대산 북대
불교학연구
2020 .01
-
懶翁三關의 禪思想 고찰
동양철학연구
2015 .01
-
나옹懶翁의 부침浮沈과 관련된 지공指空의 영향 : 지공指空에 대한 인식의 변화를 중심으로
국학연구
2014 .06
-
나옹 문학의 담화 방식과 갈래 성격
국어교육연구
2011 .02
-
懶翁의 檜巖寺 悟道에 대한 내용 모색
동양철학연구
2014 .01
-
고려 말 功夫選의 시행과 의미 고찰 : 恭愍王과 懶翁의 상호관계를 중심으로
원불교사상과종교문화
2015 .06
-
나옹 가사에 나타난 시적 대상 내용과 대상 인물의 성격
어문학
2011 .03
-
懶翁에게서 살펴지는 ‘五臺山佛敎’의 영향 — 나옹의 五臺山行과 文殊華嚴을 중심으로
온지논총
2014 .01
-
나옹혜근(懶翁惠勤) 선사상의 특징과 선심의 시적 형상화 연구
퇴계학논집
2020 .01
-
나옹시 하위 유형의 작품 세계와 선적 표현
국어교육연구
2014 .02
-
功夫十節目의 禪思想 고찰
동양철학연구
2014 .01
-
〈역대전리가〉와 형성기의 가사문학 고(考)
우리말글
2009 .12
-
懶翁慧勤의 불교계 行蹟과 遺物·遺蹟 - 諸 紀錄 및 자료의 검토 試攷 -
대각사상
2008 .01
-
나옹 선시에 나타난 시공 표현의 용어 유형
우리말글
2013 .04
-
여말선초기 懶翁 현창 운동
한국사연구
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002512819