지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Modern critics in the non-western periphery tried to assimilate their point of view to that of western core country. Especially many critics in modern Korea also followed the intellectual fashion of the western country through the Japan. To many Korean intellectual and critic, Tokyo is the window for the West. They tried to read the literary journal published by Japanese miters as soon as possible and adopt it to Korean literature. Therefore, the intellectual atmosphere of Korean literature is dominated by colonialism.
The famous Korean literary critic, Ahn Ham-Kwang(l910-1982) resisted to this colonial trend. He criticised the proletarian criticism that follows that of Japanese proletarian discourse. Main stream of Korean proletarian literature recognized that the condition of Korea is very similar with Japan or the Soviet Russia. They did not know the difference between the condition of Korean working class and that of Japan or Soviet Russia So that Ahn Ham-Kwang points that Korean proletarian literature is based on the peasants considering the global capitalism. He also did not accept the artistic method of socialist realism because it is originated from the reality of Soviet Russia He emphasized the specificity of Korean proletarian literature. Because of this viewpoint, he is blamed as nationalist from the inner circle of proletarian literature.
In the period of post-independence he assert the idea of national literature. National literature is based on the emphasis of national question. He thought that Korean peninsula was under the neo-colonialism, While North Korea is under the influence of Soviet Russia, South Korea is under the influence of U.S. Criticising the ethnocentrism, he points the importance of self- determination of periphery country.
Ahn Ham-Kwang blamed the ethnocentrism and abstract socialism in the Korean literary criticism. He always consider the uneven development of capitalism and the natoinal question. Therefore he is a rare man of decolonized mind.
The famous Korean literary critic, Ahn Ham-Kwang(l910-1982) resisted to this colonial trend. He criticised the proletarian criticism that follows that of Japanese proletarian discourse. Main stream of Korean proletarian literature recognized that the condition of Korea is very similar with Japan or the Soviet Russia. They did not know the difference between the condition of Korean working class and that of Japan or Soviet Russia So that Ahn Ham-Kwang points that Korean proletarian literature is based on the peasants considering the global capitalism. He also did not accept the artistic method of socialist realism because it is originated from the reality of Soviet Russia He emphasized the specificity of Korean proletarian literature. Because of this viewpoint, he is blamed as nationalist from the inner circle of proletarian literature.
In the period of post-independence he assert the idea of national literature. National literature is based on the emphasis of national question. He thought that Korean peninsula was under the neo-colonialism, While North Korea is under the influence of Soviet Russia, South Korea is under the influence of U.S. Criticising the ethnocentrism, he points the importance of self- determination of periphery country.
Ahn Ham-Kwang blamed the ethnocentrism and abstract socialism in the Korean literary criticism. He always consider the uneven development of capitalism and the natoinal question. Therefore he is a rare man of decolonized mind.
목차
1. 민족문제의 천착과 식민주의의 청산
2. 농민문학론과 번역 비평으로부터의 결별
3. 창작방법론 논쟁과 조선적 특수성의 강조
4. 민족문학론의 이론화
5. 민족적 특성 논쟁
6. 계급주의와 자민족중심의를 넘어서
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Phases of Development of Proletarian Literature in Korea
Korea Journal
1987 .01
-
카프와 좌련 시기의 아동문학론 고찰
한국아동문학연구
2013 .05
-
1920년대 계급주의 아동문학 비평 연구 : 소년문예운동 방향전환론의 전개와 비평사적 의미
아동청소년문학연구
2008 .12
-
1920년대 계급문학의 비동일화문학론의 두 양상
비평문학
2007 .04
-
1920-1930년대 체코와 한국의 프롤레타리아 문학의 이론가들
동유럽발칸연구
2005 .01
-
평론가 백철문학론
어문론집
2009 .11
-
1920년대 중반 이광수 문학론 연구 : 『문학강화』 와『문예쇄담』 을 중심으로
어문학
2018 .09
-
우리 문학의 연구 현황과 전망
우리말글
2004 .08
-
최초의 고려인 문학선집 『로력자의 고향』에 대한 문화사적 고찰
슬라브학보
2019 .06
-
한국문학 연구의 미래
국어국문학
2004 .09
-
한겨레 문학사 기술(文學史 記述) 방법론 : 통일시대 문학사 접근을 위한 시론(試論)
어문론집
2002 .12
-
한국고전문학 연구의 성과와 전망 : 2000년 이후를 중심으로
동서인문학
2008 .12
-
체코와 한국 프롤레타리아 시의 표현양식 비교연구
동유럽발칸연구
2012 .01
-
어린 혁명가들을 위한 과학: 마르크시즘, 진화론, 프롤레타리아 아동 문학(1920-1935)
한국과학사학회지
2015 .01
-
세계화 시대의 한국문학 : 세계문학과 지역문학의 좌표
국어국문학
2010 .08
-
한국의 빈민문학 : 근대문학을 중심으로
외국문학연구
2003 .08
-
The Influence of Chinese Literature on Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1972 .01
-
북한문학의 종류와 형태, 갈래에 관한 고찰
어문론집
2009 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002511887