지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The majority of the Joseon people who migrated to Russia before Korea established diplomatic relationship with Russia in 1884 were poor farmers. The policy of the Joseon government prior to the mid-1870s was that of severely punish anyone who was caught violating this border. Nevertheless, there were widespread rumors amongst residents along the northern border with Russia of the munificent nature of Russian emperors. To this end, these Russian emperors were depicted as the saviors of all unfortunates, and as the rescuers of all those who suffered under the despotic rule of tyrannical and greedy rulers. Such rumors resulted in a steady exodus of Joseon residents to Russia. This type of action and perception of Russia naturally ran contrary to the Joseon government's policy at the time. In addition, such perceptions of Russia were also radically divergent from those possessed by the conservative faction, who boasted a Sino-centric world-view, and by government officials, who had rigidly prohibited border transgressions as part of their despotic efforts to enforce strict control over residents. Furthermore, the view of Russia possessed by residents of the northern border areas also differed from that of the enlightenment faction, which was focused on the theory of civilization and enlightenment, and the great feats carried out by Western powers such as England, Japan, and Qing in pursuit of their own interests.
These independent perceptions of Russia were rooted in the sense of urgency that animated residents' everyday lives. They were also the result of their hope and desire for the kind of benevolent rule that had long disappeared from Joseon. As such, the residents in the northern border area began to idealize Russia and to perceive the Russian emperor as the savior who would deliver them from their misery. Based on these perceptions, many residents in the northern border area moved over the boundary they had been forbidden to cross by the Joseon government, and established a new living space for themselves in Russia. Officially registered as Russian citizens, these immigrants from Joseon exhibited a transnational identity in that they also regarded themselves as people of Joseon. While they conducted their production activities in the area that served as their primary residence, Russia, these migrants from Joseon also regularly crossed over the border to continue human and material exchanges with the residents of Hamgyeong Province.
However, the future of these immigrants who had created a transnational independent living space did not unfold as they had expected. Their hopes for benevolent rule were once again betrayed as their independent space was destroyed by the Russian central authorities. In 1937, these immigrants were forcibly relocated to Central Asia against their will. This action can be regarded as a betrayal of the dreams of these Joseon immigrants who had left their homeland in search of a utopia in which benevolent rule prevailed. In the end, their transnational independent living space and lifestyle were completely destroyed.
These independent perceptions of Russia were rooted in the sense of urgency that animated residents' everyday lives. They were also the result of their hope and desire for the kind of benevolent rule that had long disappeared from Joseon. As such, the residents in the northern border area began to idealize Russia and to perceive the Russian emperor as the savior who would deliver them from their misery. Based on these perceptions, many residents in the northern border area moved over the boundary they had been forbidden to cross by the Joseon government, and established a new living space for themselves in Russia. Officially registered as Russian citizens, these immigrants from Joseon exhibited a transnational identity in that they also regarded themselves as people of Joseon. While they conducted their production activities in the area that served as their primary residence, Russia, these migrants from Joseon also regularly crossed over the border to continue human and material exchanges with the residents of Hamgyeong Province.
However, the future of these immigrants who had created a transnational independent living space did not unfold as they had expected. Their hopes for benevolent rule were once again betrayed as their independent space was destroyed by the Russian central authorities. In 1937, these immigrants were forcibly relocated to Central Asia against their will. This action can be regarded as a betrayal of the dreams of these Joseon immigrants who had left their homeland in search of a utopia in which benevolent rule prevailed. In the end, their transnational independent living space and lifestyle were completely destroyed.
목차
머리말
1. 이주민의 증가와 조선정부의 대응
2. 이주의 원인과 仁政 願望
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (57)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
朝露 수교(1884) 전후 조선인의 러시아관
역사학보
2007 .06
-
명례궁약정과 한러비밀협정을 통해본 모스크바대관식(1896)
역사와현실
2017 .12
-
이민자통합정책이론을 통한 러시아 정부의 이주 및 노동정책 분석 연구: CIS 출신 귀환 러시안 이주민을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2013 .01
-
조러육로통상장정(1888) 체결을 둘러싼 조·청·러 삼국의 협상과정 연구
역사와현실
2012 .09
-
신북방시대 한국의 대러 외교전략과 과제
슬라브학보
2018 .12
-
러시아의 사이버안보 전략
슬라브학보
2017 .03
-
러시아사
역사학보
2001 .09
-
러시아
역사학보
1989 .12
-
러일전쟁에 대한 러시아의 역사인식- 러시아 중등역사교과서를 중심으로 -
슬라브硏究
2003 .01
-
러시아와 유라시아
러시아어문학연구논집
2015 .01
-
Made in Border
제3시대
2018 .06
-
근세초 西日本 지역 ‘조선인 집단거주지’
史叢(사총)
2009 .01
-
러시아 극동개발 프로그램과 한ㆍ중ㆍ일의 정책 : 현황 및 한국의 방향성
슬라브학보
2010 .12
-
러시아의 동아시아 정책- 유라시아 국가로서의 역할 -
슬라브硏究
2002 .01
-
러시아 정체성 형성과 ‘유럽’의 개념: 18세기 후반의 경우
러시아어문학연구논집
2015 .01
-
중국과 러시아의 전면적·전략적 협력: 동인과 현황 그리고 전망
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
러시아는 팽창국가인가? : 서구의 대 러시아 적대 이미지에 대한 비판적 분석
슬라브학보
2005 .06
-
대한제국의 對러시아정책-대한제국 수립과 義和團사건시기를 중심으로-
동방학지
2006 .01
-
CIS 경제통합에서 러시아의 역할 : 개발도상국간 경제협력에서 강대국의 경제적 구심력
슬라브학보
2013 .03
-
近代 : 러시아
역사학보
1995 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018914713