개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attemps to reconstruct the landscape of ‘Chosuneo(조선어)=National language’ and the topographical map of poetical circles reflected on Im-Wha’s linguistic practices. For this study, I examined the ideological characteristics of Im-Wha’s consciousness of language and poetic practices.
The prism of Im-Wha may be too old and crude to illuminate the various aspects of linguistic practices and ideological orientation of Korean poetry in 1930s. However, this study could be an useful approach to Korean poetry in 1930s because Im-Wha showed a critical mind in various fields of Korean modern literature, especially in Korean modern poetry.
We can find Im-wha’s linguistic consciousness in his poems and critical writings together. In his poem “The poetry of Earth(지상의 시)”, Im-Wha criticized the idealistic view of language which put the language before the behavior. He thought that the primary principle of poetry is the function of freely interpreting of language and behavor. This linguistic and poetic cognition was influenced by Marxism, especially I. Y. Marr’s lingustics. Marr was a soviet’s linguist who put the class language before the national language, but his the vulgar-materialism on linguistic was denied formally by Stalin in 1950s. Im-Wha adopted Marrism(Marr’s lingustics) to criticize the group of pure poetry(순수시파), whose aesthetics was based on the Kantian theory of aesthetic autonomy.
But, Im-Wha’s consideration of class language could not be lasted in his all critical writings. On the crisis of national language caused by Japanese Imperialistic policy, Im-Wha had not choice but to bring national language to completion as poetic diction. Besides, national language was the core in establishing “national literature”. Im-Wha thought that this work must be accomplished by “Gyeonghyangsipa(경향시파)” because nationalistic poets, the group of pure poetry(순수시파) and the modernist group in 1930s’ Korean literature gave rise to confusion in national language. Im-Wha’s demand on the hegemony of the proletariat in national language and national literature could be found in his topographical map of poetical circles. Especially, Im-Wha denied dialect as poetic diction, which could be found in Baik-suk’s poetry. Im-Wha did not regard the dialect as literary language because he thought that it’s provincialism could regress to reactionism, national reformism and aestheticism.
Im-wha’s linguistic consciousness, especially his emphasis on national language was based on the standard language, connected with the imagined community ‘modern nation’(=nation state). But On the condition of Imperialist control, “Whangguksinminwha(황국신민화)”, there was no room for “Chosuneo(조선어)”, the Korean national language. So Im-wha asserted the necessity of “Chosuneo”, only in the view of usefulness in describing reality. In this opinion, he did not demand on the nationality of language any more. This was Im-Wha’s tactic of postcolonial practice which could protect the “Chosuneo” in the crisis of extinction under the Japanese Imperialistic policy of “Whangguksinminwha”.
The prism of Im-Wha may be too old and crude to illuminate the various aspects of linguistic practices and ideological orientation of Korean poetry in 1930s. However, this study could be an useful approach to Korean poetry in 1930s because Im-Wha showed a critical mind in various fields of Korean modern literature, especially in Korean modern poetry.
We can find Im-wha’s linguistic consciousness in his poems and critical writings together. In his poem “The poetry of Earth(지상의 시)”, Im-Wha criticized the idealistic view of language which put the language before the behavior. He thought that the primary principle of poetry is the function of freely interpreting of language and behavor. This linguistic and poetic cognition was influenced by Marxism, especially I. Y. Marr’s lingustics. Marr was a soviet’s linguist who put the class language before the national language, but his the vulgar-materialism on linguistic was denied formally by Stalin in 1950s. Im-Wha adopted Marrism(Marr’s lingustics) to criticize the group of pure poetry(순수시파), whose aesthetics was based on the Kantian theory of aesthetic autonomy.
But, Im-Wha’s consideration of class language could not be lasted in his all critical writings. On the crisis of national language caused by Japanese Imperialistic policy, Im-Wha had not choice but to bring national language to completion as poetic diction. Besides, national language was the core in establishing “national literature”. Im-Wha thought that this work must be accomplished by “Gyeonghyangsipa(경향시파)” because nationalistic poets, the group of pure poetry(순수시파) and the modernist group in 1930s’ Korean literature gave rise to confusion in national language. Im-Wha’s demand on the hegemony of the proletariat in national language and national literature could be found in his topographical map of poetical circles. Especially, Im-Wha denied dialect as poetic diction, which could be found in Baik-suk’s poetry. Im-Wha did not regard the dialect as literary language because he thought that it’s provincialism could regress to reactionism, national reformism and aestheticism.
Im-wha’s linguistic consciousness, especially his emphasis on national language was based on the standard language, connected with the imagined community ‘modern nation’(=nation state). But On the condition of Imperialist control, “Whangguksinminwha(황국신민화)”, there was no room for “Chosuneo(조선어)”, the Korean national language. So Im-wha asserted the necessity of “Chosuneo”, only in the view of usefulness in describing reality. In this opinion, he did not demand on the nationality of language any more. This was Im-Wha’s tactic of postcolonial practice which could protect the “Chosuneo” in the crisis of extinction under the Japanese Imperialistic policy of “Whangguksinminwha”.
목차
1. 들어가는 말 : 임화라는 프리즘
2. 논의의 출발점 - 「지상의 시」에 대한 해석 문제
3. ‘민족어’와 ‘계급성’, 그리고 ‘현실성’의 관계
4. 시단의 지형도- 특히 방언과 지방주의의 문제
5. 맺음말
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『樸素村話』 소재 당쟁이야기의 진술방식과 지향의식 : 신임사화 관련 작품을 중심으로
한국민족문화
2004 .04
-
오디세우스 마스터플롯의 여성적 전도 과정 - 「무진기행」의 대항서사들을 중심으로
현대소설연구
2020 .06
-
주변어로서 조선어, ‘국어’ 되기
코기토
2009 .02
-
1930년대 후반기 리얼리즘시 연구 : 임화, 이용악 시의 서사성 수용 양상을 중심으로
어문론집
2006 .09
-
말을 두고 말해본다
중국조선어문
2017 .03
-
The Making of the Korean Language
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
Wha...i, Whai, a Long Long Time Ago
Korea Journal
1980 .04
-
통일언어철학의 탐색방향
어문학
2006 .03
-
생태적 관점에서의 국어 정책의 현안과 과제
한국사전학
2009 .04
-
세대간 소통을 위한 언어정책의 방향
국어국문학
2013 .08
-
국어교육에서의 언어정체성과 문법 교육의 역할
국어교육연구
2016 .06
-
어문운동의 교육적 함의와 실현 양상 연구
국어교육연구
2013 .08
-
언어변이와 언어정책
영어영문학
2014 .02
-
임화의 언어론－1930년대 중ㆍ후반의 견해를 중심으로－
국어국문학
2004 .12
-
Development of Korean Language
Korea Journal
1963 .07
-
수화의 언어학적 연구
언어사실과 관점
2014 .01
-
해방 후 국어 의식의 형성과 전개 : 어문민족주의적 국어 의식의 계승과 변화의 맥락을 중심으로
한국어학
2017 .02
-
조향의 시어론 연구
국어교육연구
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-809-018909602