지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the economic and legal world, 'Administrative Monopoly' is considered a concept that administrative power of the government and the subsidiary organization interferes free competition in the market in the process of switch from planned economy to market economy. For 2 decades Chinese academic world has been through a lot of controversies the substantial meaning of administrative monopoly, how to express it and whether it is legitimate or not, etc.
Thus in the anti-monopoly law drafted in February 2004, a separate article about prohibition on administrative monopoly was set up enumerating the examples in detail such as prohibition on purchase of particularly designated products by the central administrative organization and its subsidiary offices (Article 32), prohibition on market entrance of new businesses (Article 33) and on restriction or exclusion of competition (Article 32), etc. Since majority has voted negatively against it in the inspection of the draft, so in amended draft passed on June 7, 2006 it was reduced to one provision on legal responsibility for administrative monopoly and now in Article 8 of the anti-monopoly law stating that an organization with management ability of public affairs, authorized by administrative organization and law shall not exclude or restrict competition abusing the administrative authority," and in Article 5, it is separately regulated on abuse of administrative authority to exclude or restrict competition.
On the contrary in the anti-monopoly law of Korea includes a regulation that suggests a resolution of many problems so far, however, there is no clear answer yet about how to prohibit administrative monopoly by the regulation.
Therefore we intend to examine theories on administrative monopoly that is currently being discussed in China and look for an effective and fundamental solution of administrative monopoly.
Thus in the anti-monopoly law drafted in February 2004, a separate article about prohibition on administrative monopoly was set up enumerating the examples in detail such as prohibition on purchase of particularly designated products by the central administrative organization and its subsidiary offices (Article 32), prohibition on market entrance of new businesses (Article 33) and on restriction or exclusion of competition (Article 32), etc. Since majority has voted negatively against it in the inspection of the draft, so in amended draft passed on June 7, 2006 it was reduced to one provision on legal responsibility for administrative monopoly and now in Article 8 of the anti-monopoly law stating that an organization with management ability of public affairs, authorized by administrative organization and law shall not exclude or restrict competition abusing the administrative authority," and in Article 5, it is separately regulated on abuse of administrative authority to exclude or restrict competition.
On the contrary in the anti-monopoly law of Korea includes a regulation that suggests a resolution of many problems so far, however, there is no clear answer yet about how to prohibit administrative monopoly by the regulation.
Therefore we intend to examine theories on administrative monopoly that is currently being discussed in China and look for an effective and fundamental solution of administrative monopoly.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 행정독점의 개념과 특징
Ⅲ. 행정독점 규제
Ⅳ. 협상(協商, 협의)을 통한 행정독점문제 해결
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (54)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박제현 / 2008 / 중국의 “반부정당경쟁법(反不正当竟爭法)”에 대한 고찰 / 중국법연구 9 : 175 ~ 196
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 손영화 / 2008 / 中國 反獨占法에 관한 硏究 / 상사법연구 27 (3) : 351 ~ 390
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 조성국 / 2006 / 獨占規制法 事件의 合意解決에 대한 國際動向과 示唆點 / 중앙법학 8 (3) : 349 ~ 379
4. [보고서] - 법제처 / 2009 / 중국반독점법에 관한 연구
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 王保树 / 1998 / 论反垄断法对行政垄断的规制 / 中国社会科学院研究生院学报 (5)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 손영화 / 2008 / 中國 反獨占法에 관한 硏究 / 상사법연구 27 (3) : 351 ~ 390
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 조성국 / 2006 / 獨占規制法 事件의 合意解決에 대한 國際動向과 示唆點 / 중앙법학 8 (3) : 349 ~ 379
4. [보고서] - 법제처 / 2009 / 중국반독점법에 관한 연구
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 王保树 / 1998 / 论反垄断法对行政垄断的规制 / 中国社会科学院研究生院学报 (5)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 반독점법의 특징과 적용
한양법학
2012 .02
-
중국반독점법의 행정독점 규제와 한계
한국동북아논총
2007 .06
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
중국 반독점법 집행에서 행정독점 규제
중국과 중국학
2014 .06
-
중국의 반독점법의 적용과 시사점
무역연구
2015 .01
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
중국 반독점법 초안의 문제점과 입법 필요성에 관한 연구
산업경제연구
2007 .06
-
한국 대통령의 ‘정치적 독점(political monopoly)’에 대한 이론적 고찰
국제정치연구
2009 .12
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
東アジアにおける比較行政法の可能性
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
중국법상 行政審判機關의 終局裁決權과 그에 대한 評價
법학연구
2005 .12
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
현대의 행정 변화와 행정법학 방법론 연구 : 전통적 행정법학의 방법론 분석과 그 보완을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
한국의 행정계획
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
기업결합에 관한 중국 반독점법의 문제점 연구
강원법학
2012 .02
-
Monopoly Regulation Law In Korea : Records of its nine years enforcement
저스티스
1990 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-018845383