지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is about the people's lives which I divided into 4 sections after analyzing a war record at the Quelling War of the Yihetuan Movement. The four sections are the following; first of all, the fear of workmen requisition and the misery of starvation of Beijing and Tianjin locals. Secondly, the dreadful scene of the Chinese Massacre which took place in the border areas between China and Russia. Thirdly, the actual conditions of Korean refugees and Korea as a quasi-war area due to Chinese and Russian refugees and plunder through border areas between China and Korea. Lastly, the sanitary threats to the local people in the war areas such as the epidemic outbreak or exposure to the sex trade.
Seven countries except Japan among the Allies weren't provided with enough war supplies including military provisions or workmen due to the long distance from the front to their own countries. For that reason, they were replenished by pillage or requisition from war areas or relied on Korea or Japan for many parts. The greatest difficulty was gathering workmen to transport materials, and the Allies caught any people regardless of their class such as scholars, farmers, artisans and tradesmen and overworked them. Therefore, the refugees in the Beijing and Tianjin areas felt reluctant to come back their homes in spite of death from the elements in foreign lands. Moreover, all the grain storehouses of Qing were taken by the Allies and the prices rose two or three times. In the end, the local people in Beijing and Tianjin degenerated into ragged beggars and faced death from cold and hunger.
Before the outbreak of war in border areas between China and Russia, they lived peacefully in harmony with themselves. However, after the outbreak of war, the sweeping Chinese Massacre was carried out in the border areas, Blagoveshchensk, Jiangdong 64tun and Heihetun, by Russia. Additionally, approximately 200,000 Chinese people who lived in Irkutsk. Nerchinsk, Vladivostok and Sakhalin islands were massacred and approximately 2,000 Korean people in Hunchun were slaughtered. The underlying cause of the Chinese Massacre by Russia is said to be that Russia tried to get rid of all the Chinese in border areas which later belonged to the area as Russian territory. Another theory is said to be the fear of Yellow Peril, the prevalent notion of a color metaphor for race at that time, due to yellow race extension.
The Korea-Chinese border became the supply base for providing war supplies and station porters to the eight Allies. From the western sea and the northern border, hundreds and thousands of Russian train workers, refugees from Manchuria, Koreans from Kando, and the remnants and remaining powers of Yihetuan came down to Korea everyday. Refugees with nothing plundered, raped and burned out houses. That made the people in Uiju, Jinnampo and Pyeong Yang evacuate, and to make matters worse, the Korean people were also forced to die from hunger due to the sharply raised prices from releasing abroad too much grain such as rice and beans.
Dysentery, cholera and pests were spread in the war areas. Cholera broke out near the Amur River, in which the Chinese Massacre took place, and it spread to Korea. The war record says that there were more dead people from the epidemic diseases than from fighting. Meanwhile, the long stationing of over 200,000 soldiers from eight countries, resulted in a serious sex trade and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.
Seven countries except Japan among the Allies weren't provided with enough war supplies including military provisions or workmen due to the long distance from the front to their own countries. For that reason, they were replenished by pillage or requisition from war areas or relied on Korea or Japan for many parts. The greatest difficulty was gathering workmen to transport materials, and the Allies caught any people regardless of their class such as scholars, farmers, artisans and tradesmen and overworked them. Therefore, the refugees in the Beijing and Tianjin areas felt reluctant to come back their homes in spite of death from the elements in foreign lands. Moreover, all the grain storehouses of Qing were taken by the Allies and the prices rose two or three times. In the end, the local people in Beijing and Tianjin degenerated into ragged beggars and faced death from cold and hunger.
Before the outbreak of war in border areas between China and Russia, they lived peacefully in harmony with themselves. However, after the outbreak of war, the sweeping Chinese Massacre was carried out in the border areas, Blagoveshchensk, Jiangdong 64tun and Heihetun, by Russia. Additionally, approximately 200,000 Chinese people who lived in Irkutsk. Nerchinsk, Vladivostok and Sakhalin islands were massacred and approximately 2,000 Korean people in Hunchun were slaughtered. The underlying cause of the Chinese Massacre by Russia is said to be that Russia tried to get rid of all the Chinese in border areas which later belonged to the area as Russian territory. Another theory is said to be the fear of Yellow Peril, the prevalent notion of a color metaphor for race at that time, due to yellow race extension.
The Korea-Chinese border became the supply base for providing war supplies and station porters to the eight Allies. From the western sea and the northern border, hundreds and thousands of Russian train workers, refugees from Manchuria, Koreans from Kando, and the remnants and remaining powers of Yihetuan came down to Korea everyday. Refugees with nothing plundered, raped and burned out houses. That made the people in Uiju, Jinnampo and Pyeong Yang evacuate, and to make matters worse, the Korean people were also forced to die from hunger due to the sharply raised prices from releasing abroad too much grain such as rice and beans.
Dysentery, cholera and pests were spread in the war areas. Cholera broke out near the Amur River, in which the Chinese Massacre took place, and it spread to Korea. The war record says that there were more dead people from the epidemic diseases than from fighting. Meanwhile, the long stationing of over 200,000 soldiers from eight countries, resulted in a serious sex trade and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 전쟁견문록 소개 및 분석
Ⅱ. 전쟁지역 민중의 삶
맺음말
참고문헌 (71)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
1900년 전후 동북아 3대 전쟁과 군위안소
중국근현대사연구
2009 .12
-
“6.25”전쟁과 남북분단에 대한 성찰과 문학적 서사 : 중국문학과 조선족문학을 중심으로
통일인문학
2011 .05
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
The Strategy for One Korea, and the Third War
신학논단
1994 .06
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
한국 전쟁영화의 발전과 특징 : 한국전쟁에서 베트남전쟁까지
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
한국소설에 나타난 베트남 전쟁의 특성과 참전 한국군의 정체성
한국현대문학연구
2003 .12
-
전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
日本思想
2013 .01
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
한국전쟁기 38선 북진과 냉전의 고착화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
망각의 공동체와 기억의 소설적 의미-황순원의 〈나무들 비탈에 서다〉 연구-
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
Literature After the Korean War
Korea Journal
1977 .06
-
사상심리전의 텍스트로서 한국전쟁 : 자유세계로의 확산과 동아시아적 귀환
역사비평
2017 .02
-
전쟁과 폭력에 대한 기독교 현실주의적 이해
대학과 복음
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
이은자 저, 『의화단운동 전후의 산동 - 민간종교결사와 권회에 관한 연구』, 서울: 고려대학교 출판부, 2002. 10
김종건
중국근현대사연구
2003
.06
獨逸의 義和團運動鎭壓戰爭 참가에 대한 一考察
車瓊愛
동양사학연구
1995
.04
청말(淸末) 시기 만주(滿洲)지역 연구 : 유럽 개신교 선교부의 도래와 관련하여
박형신
한국기독교와 역사
2015
.09
淸末 革命派의 내셔널리즘 : 吳祿貞과 『延吉邊務報告』
金衡鍾
중국근현대사연구
2012
.06
서구 동양학의 계보와 동양인식 : 제국주의 시대 독일의 동아시아학과 그 학자들을 중심으로
정현백
아시아문화연구
2012
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-912-018645505