지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.6
- 수록면
- 333 - 355 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.18284/jss.2009.06.28.1.333
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims at analysing the basic principles for the examination between submitted documents and terms and conditions of the credit would be determined under UCP 600 through in depth comparison with relevant articles of UCP 500. Article 14 does in the UCP 600 what the old Article 13 in the UCP 500. It establishes the basic responsibility of the banks to examine documents tendered under letters of credit. This study finds that the article 14 in UCP 600 with respect to the provision of examination of the presented documents seem to provide better simplicity and clarity to the banks.
We shall be concentrating here on three aspects of this duty which have in some way been altered by the new rules. First, the basic duty to examine the documents "appear on their face". Two points need to be made about this newly drafted part of Article 14(a). ① The phrase "with reasonable care", which was used in the old Article 13(a) of the UCP 500, has been omitted. ② The duty is to examine "whether or not the the documents appear on their face" to comply. There was much discussion during the revision process whether the words "on their face"added anything of substance to the word "appear" and although there was clear agreement that they did not, there was no agreement as to whether the words "on their face"should be deleted. Secondly, the time allowed to the banks to examine the documents. The old Article 13(b) of the UCP 500 gave each bank involved in the credit a "reasonable time" was deleted and the maximum number of banking days available for banks to examine documents had been limited to five banking days from seven banking days following the day of presentation. The removal of "reasonable time", not to exceed seven banking days" for checking documents and its replacement by five banking days should shorten the process. Thirdly, linkage/consistency between the documents tendered-Article 14(d) and (e) in UCP 600. It caused great debate during the revision process. The question is the degree to which inconsistencies between the documents tendered was to contitute a discrepancy preventing payment. This came to be known in the revision process as the "linkage" issue.+
We shall be concentrating here on three aspects of this duty which have in some way been altered by the new rules. First, the basic duty to examine the documents "appear on their face". Two points need to be made about this newly drafted part of Article 14(a). ① The phrase "with reasonable care", which was used in the old Article 13(a) of the UCP 500, has been omitted. ② The duty is to examine "whether or not the the documents appear on their face" to comply. There was much discussion during the revision process whether the words "on their face"added anything of substance to the word "appear" and although there was clear agreement that they did not, there was no agreement as to whether the words "on their face"should be deleted. Secondly, the time allowed to the banks to examine the documents. The old Article 13(b) of the UCP 500 gave each bank involved in the credit a "reasonable time" was deleted and the maximum number of banking days available for banks to examine documents had been limited to five banking days from seven banking days following the day of presentation. The removal of "reasonable time", not to exceed seven banking days" for checking documents and its replacement by five banking days should shorten the process. Thirdly, linkage/consistency between the documents tendered-Article 14(d) and (e) in UCP 600. It caused great debate during the revision process. The question is the degree to which inconsistencies between the documents tendered was to contitute a discrepancy preventing payment. This came to be known in the revision process as the "linkage" issue.+
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. UCP 500과 UCP 600 서류심사 규정
Ⅲ. 서류심사에 관한 판례분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
UCP 600의 14조 서류심사에 관한 연구
경영경제
2008 .02
-
UCP 600 개정판 주요 내용의 비교분석과 실무적용상의 유의점
대한경영학회지
2007 .10
-
제6차 개정 신용장통일규칙(UCP 600)의 주요 내용에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2007 .02
-
UCP 600의 주요개정 내용 및 실무적용상의 문제점에 대한 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2007 .03
-
개정 UCP 600의 주요 내용에 대한 고찰
e-비즈니스연구
2006 .12
-
UCP 600에서의 원본서류와 사본의 수리요건에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2008 .05
-
UCP 600의 주요쟁점과 실무적용상의 문제점 : 당사자의 권리와 의무중심으로
무역학회지
2007 .08
-
신용장거래관습 최적편성방안의 모색 : UCP 600 제14조 (b)항의 재해석
무역상무연구
2011 .02
-
UCP 600에서의 은행의 서류심사 및 불일치 서류에 대한 은행의 대응에 관한 연구
무역연구
2012 .01
-
UCP 600의 새로운 개념도입상의 문제점과 해결방안에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2010 .02
-
UCP 600상의 운송서류조항에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2008 .02
-
UCP 600 적용상 인수 및 연지급신용장 매입에 관한 문제점
통상정보연구
2009 .09
-
UCP 600상의 보험서류조항에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2008 .12
-
UCP 600 이후 복합운송서류의 하자여부 국제판정 사례연구
무역학회지
2009 .11
-
UCP 600 海上運送書類 規定의 主要 改正事項에 관한 硏究
무역상무연구
2007 .08
-
貿易去來 電子化에 따른 信用狀去來에서의 書類의 原本과 寫本 - UCP 500의 규정과 영국의 판례를 중심으로 -
해사법연구
2004 .01
-
UCP 600의 실무상의 문제점에 관한 한･미간 비교연구
무역연구
2012 .01
-
자동성립조건부 조건변경에 관한 UCP 600 제10조 f항의 해석과 은행실무상의 대응책
무역연구
2009 .01
-
화환신용장통일규칙에서 전자서류에 대한 규정의 삽입 필요성과 방안
지역개발연구
2004 .07
-
UCP 600의 실무상의 유의점에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2009 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-018508179