메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제8권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
313 - 329 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study intends to study the problems in the practice of Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits(UCP 600) between Korea and U.S.A. Generally speaking, both countries comply with UCP 600 well. Nevertheless, there are some differences in the practice between both countries owing to the difference in law. First, there is a difference of application in the standby letters of credit between both countries. Korean banks mostly comply with UCP 600 in the credit, but U.S. banks mostly comply with ISP 98 in the credit. Secondly, there is a difference in interpreting the examination time for documents presented. Korean banks have a maximum of five banking days following the day of presentation to determine if a presentation is complying, but U.S. banks have a maximum of seven banking days in the case. Thirdly, there is a difference in interpreting whether the negotiating bank can have recourse against the beneficiary. Korean banks always have recourse against the beneficiary, but U.S. banks may or may not have recourse against the beneficiary. Korean banks should pay closer attention to three issues in the letters of credit operation under UCP 600. First, the issue is the definition of negotiation. Negotiation by non-nominated bank, cable negotiation and negotiation under reserve are not covered under UCP 600. Secondly, there happens merger when accepting and deferred payment banks negotiate their accepted bills. Thirdly, it should be noted that the interpretation of ‘from’ in relation the maturity date is different from that used in relation to periods for shipment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0