메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제18권 제2호 (인문 사회과학편)
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
339 - 348 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is designed to investigate the level of judges' decision cognition of hockey players in junior-high school, high school, and college and to analyse the influence of the level of cognition on hockey players' psychological states and game. Selected 229 subjects responded to questionnaires. Collected data were analyzed by using ANOVA, regression analysis. The results of the study were as follows:
1. The result about the influence of hockey judges' decision cognition on athletes' psychological states and games in demographical variables:
1-1. There was useful difference on general cognition about judges' decision in education variable(p<.05).
1-2. There was useful difference on fairness cognition about judges' decision in gender, education, and exercise experience variables(p<.05).
2. The result about influence of hockey players' cognition of judges' decision on psychological state and games was that the level of cognition had effects on athletes' psychological state and games. Furthermore, it showed useful difference(p<.05).
According to the results of this study, Korean hockey players have different level of cognition about judges' decision depending on gender, education, and exercise experience. Hockey players maintain stable psychological state by cognizing the consistency of judges' decision and this stable psychological state positively affects on performance of games.
Hockey players generally have low level of cognition about judges' decision. Therefore, improved system selecting more competent judges and organized judges' training policy is needed in order to get respect and to improve the level of trust about judges and judges' decision.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-692-018404652