지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
My purpose in this article is to study the ideology and the mechanism regarding the separation of medical practice and pharmacy. The key ideology of the separation is to protect people from harmful effect of medicine as medicine is possibly dangerous substance. Additional intention of the article is that all medical supplies should be administered without a certain profit motive by the prescriber as the use of medicine is not decided by consumer but by physicians or pharmacists. If medical supplies were decided with profit oriented purpose, it surely does harm to patients. The Separation System has been schemed because of such a possibility. Under the system the right and duty of a physician as a prescriber and a pharmacist as a medicine supplier is respectively given.
The success of this Separation System I think depends on policies which rule out interfering from physician and pharmacist each other in the course of administration. More important step is that the prohibition of twofold ownership of medical care organization and pharmacy. In this regard the separation means the independence from each part of medical organization and pharmacy.
Once the prescription is opened to the public by the separation, the high quality of medical care will be possible due to the exact and careful prescription of physician. Consequently medical democratization will be settled through the freedom of treatment information given to patient himself or herself.
The article would like to enumerate or prove the key appropriateness and additional opinion on the separation of pharmacy from medical practice as follows:
Ⅰ. The concept of Separation System:
The separation means not only separation between prescribing and dispensing but one between medical practice and pharmacy.
Ⅱ. The classification of medicine
They classify prescribed medicine and non-prescribed medicine in America which classification method is the same as that of Korea. I have maintained that three-divided classification method like in Germany and England should be adopted.
Ⅲ. The important ideology of Separation System:
The System not only prevents medical abuse of people but also controls over application of all drugs and medicines. The Separation System is fundamentally twofold security system. The Reason is that the separation of pharmacy from medical practice is intended to take care of individual health and at the same time to derive a resonable medical cost by checking abuse of medicine.
Ⅳ. pharmacists and physicians should work in collaboration to get a good outcome of medicinal treatment which otherwise would result in worse and unsatisfactory treatment.
Ⅴ. Harmonization in practice under the Separation System:
In practice of health care occasional harmonization between pharmacist and physician is required. That means both prescribing by pharmacist and dispensing by physician do not counter to the purpose of the Separation System.
Ⅵ. I suggest to set up a kind of collaborating organization like an association by regional unit(community) which consists of physicians (doctors) and pharmacists. In addition to separation of prescriber's duty from pharmacist's, mutual discussion and check between them will bring about high quality medicine services and be able to diminish trial and error because the possible incidence of side effects and compliances of medicines should be confirmed through the collaborating system.
Ⅶ. New pharmacy law is to be interpreted newly.
In the new law pharmacist should be appraised not so much as a mere salesman as a pharmacist who fills a prescription and as a counsellor who helps patient with much medicine information. At any rate, in light of the fact that because of many exceptional articles in the laws of Japan it was unable to achieve the original purpose of separation system, korean laws concerning the above mentioned separation laws I think are going the other way.
Now the three subjects including patient, physician, and pharmacist have to observe the pharmacy law, and gradually revise unsatisfactory parts of it. It is concluded that the separation system continuously have to keep the following three basic structure: (1) Classification of medicines. (2) Independence of hospital and pharmacy. (3) Collaboration of physician and pharmacist.
The right of health is a basic right for human beings. It is the country's basic duty for the country to keep and improve human health by means of various kinds of health care systems. One of the foremost important medical care system is the separation of pharmacy from medical practice. The separation system embodies human dignity as well as guarantees health right by preventing the anticipated harmful effects of medicine.
The success of this Separation System I think depends on policies which rule out interfering from physician and pharmacist each other in the course of administration. More important step is that the prohibition of twofold ownership of medical care organization and pharmacy. In this regard the separation means the independence from each part of medical organization and pharmacy.
Once the prescription is opened to the public by the separation, the high quality of medical care will be possible due to the exact and careful prescription of physician. Consequently medical democratization will be settled through the freedom of treatment information given to patient himself or herself.
The article would like to enumerate or prove the key appropriateness and additional opinion on the separation of pharmacy from medical practice as follows:
Ⅰ. The concept of Separation System:
The separation means not only separation between prescribing and dispensing but one between medical practice and pharmacy.
Ⅱ. The classification of medicine
They classify prescribed medicine and non-prescribed medicine in America which classification method is the same as that of Korea. I have maintained that three-divided classification method like in Germany and England should be adopted.
Ⅲ. The important ideology of Separation System:
The System not only prevents medical abuse of people but also controls over application of all drugs and medicines. The Separation System is fundamentally twofold security system. The Reason is that the separation of pharmacy from medical practice is intended to take care of individual health and at the same time to derive a resonable medical cost by checking abuse of medicine.
Ⅳ. pharmacists and physicians should work in collaboration to get a good outcome of medicinal treatment which otherwise would result in worse and unsatisfactory treatment.
Ⅴ. Harmonization in practice under the Separation System:
In practice of health care occasional harmonization between pharmacist and physician is required. That means both prescribing by pharmacist and dispensing by physician do not counter to the purpose of the Separation System.
Ⅵ. I suggest to set up a kind of collaborating organization like an association by regional unit(community) which consists of physicians (doctors) and pharmacists. In addition to separation of prescriber's duty from pharmacist's, mutual discussion and check between them will bring about high quality medicine services and be able to diminish trial and error because the possible incidence of side effects and compliances of medicines should be confirmed through the collaborating system.
Ⅶ. New pharmacy law is to be interpreted newly.
In the new law pharmacist should be appraised not so much as a mere salesman as a pharmacist who fills a prescription and as a counsellor who helps patient with much medicine information. At any rate, in light of the fact that because of many exceptional articles in the laws of Japan it was unable to achieve the original purpose of separation system, korean laws concerning the above mentioned separation laws I think are going the other way.
Now the three subjects including patient, physician, and pharmacist have to observe the pharmacy law, and gradually revise unsatisfactory parts of it. It is concluded that the separation system continuously have to keep the following three basic structure: (1) Classification of medicines. (2) Independence of hospital and pharmacy. (3) Collaboration of physician and pharmacist.
The right of health is a basic right for human beings. It is the country's basic duty for the country to keep and improve human health by means of various kinds of health care systems. One of the foremost important medical care system is the separation of pharmacy from medical practice. The separation system embodies human dignity as well as guarantees health right by preventing the anticipated harmful effects of medicine.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 보건의료공법제도
Ⅲ. 의약분업제도의 이념
Ⅳ. 의약분업의 기본적 구조
Ⅴ. 의료기관과 약국의 독립의무
Ⅵ. 의사와 약사의 상호협력의무
Ⅶ. 의약분업과 실천적 조화(법 제21조)
Ⅷ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
의약분업 이후 약국의 운영현황 분석
한국병원경영학회지
2002 .01
-
부산시 개원 의사와 개국 약사의 의약분업 정책목적 달성도와 손익에 대한 인식도
보건행정학회지
2001 .01
-
의약분업 이후 병원 약제부서의 업무내용 및 인력구조 변화 분석
한국병원경영학회지
2002 .01
-
의약분업이후 병원문전약국과 동네약국 이용자의 만족도 비교
한국병원경영학회지
2001 .01
-
환자의 알권리 - 의약품의 처방 및 조제와 관련하여 -
의료법학
2003 .01
-
개국약사의 적정조제건수 산출
보건행정학회지
2001 .01
-
의약분업실시에 따른 약국부문 경영수지 변화추계
한국병원경영학회지
2002 .01
-
주요 외국 지역약국 서비스 유형별 지불보상방식
보건경제와 정책연구
2013 .01
-
의약분업이 의원 및 약국의 영업이익에 미친 영향
보건행정학회지
2004 .01
-
약사의 항생제 관리 업무 시행 방안 및 효과
피해자학연구
2011 .01
-
약국의 입지특성 및 서비스품질이 약국의 추천의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
부동산학연구
2012 .01
-
2000년 의료사태의 경험과 교훈
보건행정학회지
2001 .01
-
약국의 수익성 결정 요인에 관한 연구
보건경제와 정책연구
2010 .01
-
제조물책임법상 제조물로서의 의약품의 개념
의료법학
2006 .01
-
영국의 일반의약품(Over-the-counter drugs) 관리법의 의료정책적 함의
의료법학
2011 .01
-
의.약분업 왜 안 되나\ulcorner -경제학적 일고-
보건행정학회지
1992 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Policy Learning without a Policy Guide? A Pilot Program for the Separation of Prescribing and Dispensing in Korea 1981-1985
LIM Sang hun
한국정치학회보
2014
.12
遠隔醫療에서 醫師의 責任原理
류화신
비교사법
2005
.03
원격의료시스템의 성능 평가 기준
박샛별
,
송준현
,
도형호
외 7명
한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집
2011
.11
일반의약품 판매규제 완화효과와 정책제언
염민선
유통연구
2010
.12
의약법(Pharmaceutical and Public Health Law)과 행정법 : 의약품등의 분류지정과 전환지정
선정원
행정법연구
2008
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002115513