메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第25卷 第5號
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
79 - 86 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After the public housing policy was broken off, the housing policy for the low-income brackets does not seem to exist any longer. Therefore, the existed public houses are the key of the stable dwelling for the low-income brackets. According to the regulations of urban and residential environment improvement of Seoul, the public housing that was completed in 1989 should be used eighteen years more by 2025, and the public housing that was completed afterwards should be used twenty four years more by 2031 in order to be redeveloped.
For the reasons mentioned above, this study aims to evaluate the residential satisfaction through questionnaire survey, and to obtain the direction for the improvement of the residential satisfaction. Among the public housing located in Seoul, seventeen housing complexes that are managed by SH corporation were investigated. The questionnaires were asked the residents who live in the decrepit five cases which were selected on the basic of the completion year.
The results of this study are as follows;
'Size of each room', 'size of house', and 'a number of room for a family member' were dissatisfied elements in interior environment. 'A location and a number of bicycle depository', 'parking lot', and 'decrepit level of building' were found that the residents were not satisfied with in exterior environment. Also, 'management expenses', 'the service of management staff and security man', and 'safety management' were the element that the residents were not satisfied with. From fact analysis, the satisfaction factors of the public housing are 'size of residential unit', 'basic supply facilities', 'natural lighting and view', 'safety and security', 'location and exterior', 'parking and traffic', 'community facilities', 'residential cost', 'maintenance'and 'sanitary'.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 우리나라의 영구임대주택 정책
3. 조사대상의 선정 및 분석틀
4. 거주자 설문 조사
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-018378770