지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.3
- 수록면
- 25 - 61 (37page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Just as the end of the Cold War brought about a difference in the security paradigm, it also has given some room for reconsideration of security issues relevant to the Korean peninsula. This has raised the necessity of the Korean question to be tackled from the perspectives of "comprehensive security," including economic and humanitarian dimensions, particularly since the manifestation of the North's food and refugee crisis. This article discusses four separate but interrelated aspects of the relations between North Korea and international organizations(IOs)-diplomatic/political, military/security, economic, and humanitarian-by examining whether the integration theory of functionalism and neofunctionalism is appropriate to explain the promotion of North Korean engagement by the international community.
The article argues that with respect to the inter-Korean peace process, the United Nations and other IOs have played a limited and indirect role. Yet, North Korea's interaction with the IOs has had some relevance to peace and security on Korean peninsula. From the traditional security perspective, IOs, particularly UN bodies, have continually made efforts to exercise their influence so that North Korea would comply with international law, as demonstrated by the UN Security Council's and IAEA's statements and resolutions in the case of the previous and current North Korean nuclear threats. Both inter-governmental organizations(IGOs) and international nongovernmental organizations(NGOs) have been also instrumental in promoting nontraditional security matters by providing developmental and humanitarian assistance. In this sense, this chapter has discussed the role of IOs that complements traditional government-to-government diplomacy by engaging North Korea into international society. Such efforts are necessary not only to address current North Korean problems and facilitate the inter-Korean reconciliation process, but also to help prepare for a post-Kim long n system.
North Korea's UN diplomacy seems to be increasingly important and relevant for both traditional and nontraditional causes because it can be used to strengthen its existing government. This will depend on whether the Kim long Il government can implement a new foreign policy of observing international laws and ethics and promoting international cooperation, consequently moving out of its diplomatic isolation. The success of North Korea's UN diplomacy also relies on whether it can utilize multilateral projects such as the UNDP-sponsored TRADP and humanitarian assistance by the WFP, the FAO, and other international relief organizations, in order to improve the economic and social conditions of its people. Such economic incentives and humanitarian aid can prove to be successful not only in stabilizing the domestic situation of North Korea but also in promoting a stable, peaceful, and mutually profitable interdependent situation between the two Koreas, and in further enhancing regional stability.
However, such "functionalist approaches" may not work in the case of the inter-Korean peace process, where geopolitical complications and North Korea's uncertainty prevail. Indeed, intensifying economic and social interdependence and humanitarian assistance alone have not generated the necessary conditions for the peace and security on the Korean peninsula, as manifested by the crisis driven by the North's nuclear problem. Therefore, consolidating confidence building measures in a "more traditional" political and military sector seems to be more crucial, at least in advancing North Korea's engagement with the international community. For this, the role of political leaders with strong commitment and the will to make a political breakthrough (including the rapprochement between North Korea and the United States) is of utmost importance. Still, the efforts of addressing the issue of nontraditional and 'soft' security should not be given up, and should rather be continued as important and complementary factors in the inter-Korean process.
The article argues that with respect to the inter-Korean peace process, the United Nations and other IOs have played a limited and indirect role. Yet, North Korea's interaction with the IOs has had some relevance to peace and security on Korean peninsula. From the traditional security perspective, IOs, particularly UN bodies, have continually made efforts to exercise their influence so that North Korea would comply with international law, as demonstrated by the UN Security Council's and IAEA's statements and resolutions in the case of the previous and current North Korean nuclear threats. Both inter-governmental organizations(IGOs) and international nongovernmental organizations(NGOs) have been also instrumental in promoting nontraditional security matters by providing developmental and humanitarian assistance. In this sense, this chapter has discussed the role of IOs that complements traditional government-to-government diplomacy by engaging North Korea into international society. Such efforts are necessary not only to address current North Korean problems and facilitate the inter-Korean reconciliation process, but also to help prepare for a post-Kim long n system.
North Korea's UN diplomacy seems to be increasingly important and relevant for both traditional and nontraditional causes because it can be used to strengthen its existing government. This will depend on whether the Kim long Il government can implement a new foreign policy of observing international laws and ethics and promoting international cooperation, consequently moving out of its diplomatic isolation. The success of North Korea's UN diplomacy also relies on whether it can utilize multilateral projects such as the UNDP-sponsored TRADP and humanitarian assistance by the WFP, the FAO, and other international relief organizations, in order to improve the economic and social conditions of its people. Such economic incentives and humanitarian aid can prove to be successful not only in stabilizing the domestic situation of North Korea but also in promoting a stable, peaceful, and mutually profitable interdependent situation between the two Koreas, and in further enhancing regional stability.
However, such "functionalist approaches" may not work in the case of the inter-Korean peace process, where geopolitical complications and North Korea's uncertainty prevail. Indeed, intensifying economic and social interdependence and humanitarian assistance alone have not generated the necessary conditions for the peace and security on the Korean peninsula, as manifested by the crisis driven by the North's nuclear problem. Therefore, consolidating confidence building measures in a "more traditional" political and military sector seems to be more crucial, at least in advancing North Korea's engagement with the international community. For this, the role of political leaders with strong commitment and the will to make a political breakthrough (including the rapprochement between North Korea and the United States) is of utmost importance. Still, the efforts of addressing the issue of nontraditional and 'soft' security should not be given up, and should rather be continued as important and complementary factors in the inter-Korean process.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기능주의와 신기능주의 통합이론에 관한 이론적 개요
Ⅲ. 전통적 안보 측면에서 본 북한과 국제기구의 관계
Ⅳ. 비전통적 안보측면에서 본 북한과 국제기구의 관계
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대북 인도적 지원의 실효성 연구: 평가지표와 과제
통일정책연구
2005 .01
-
The Change of North Korea and the Security of the Korean Peninsula
사회과학연구
1996 .12
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
The North Korean Economy: Current Situation, Crisis, and Possible Scenarios
Asian International Studies Review
2006 .01
-
북한사회의 변화 전망과 대북 정책의 방향
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
Changes in North Korea and Policy Responses of the International Community toward North Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2009 .09
-
새정부의 대북정책 방향과 지자체의 역할
경기논단
2008 .03
-
북한 개별관광의 유엔(UN) 안전보장이사회 대북제재 위반 여부와 추진방안
호텔리조트연구
2020 .01
-
Understanding the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2004 .01
-
북한의 ‘민족공조’론과 남북관계 10년 : 평가와 전망
통일정책연구
2004 .01
-
북한의 위기상황에 대한 국제인도법적 검토
서울국제법연구
2011 .12
-
대북지원의 인간안보적 재해석
북한연구학회보
2012 .01
-
국제개발기구의 교육원조 정책과 북한의 교육개발
현대북한연구
2008 .12
-
대북지원 10년의 성과와 과제: 대북개발지원을 위한 제언
통일정책연구
2005 .01
-
북한 사회 연구동향과 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018344478