지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Koguryo constructed a world in which there was no rival and dominate the continent and the sea off the Korean Peninsula. This project was pursued through the policy of southward advance by King Kwanggaeto and his successors. We can make sure of this fact by an analysis of Horae's Stele.
First of all, there is an argument that the feature of this policy was nothing but to reflect shift in power balance in the Korean Peninsula, but this point of view appears to have been arisen from a misled conception in which one will not understand Peninsula-centered character of our national history in a proper sense. We shouldn't judge this policy of southward advance by the perspective of northward advance as if it were the absolute one. We may also evaluate Koguryo's development affirmatively after the transfer of its capital to P'yongyang, in such respects as the increase of its population and fruitful harvest of 5 kinds of grains, etc. The transfer of its capital also made a great contribution to building a national identity by sharing food, clothes and shelter in common. So Koguryo's southward advance was not just a result of a change in political power but also a beginning in the building process of Korean nationality. In this respect, studying King Horae's Stele is of great importance in the close examination of this process.
Secondly, the transfer of Koguryo's capital and subcapital to the Daedong River and Central region of Korean Peninsula, respectively, can be seen to have been the result of the change in its national character. Therefore, it is a great error to look upon Koguryo just as a state centered on the Korean Peninsula or to consider Manchuria and Korean Peninsula separately. Here, in this article, I put a great emphasis on the folloing ponint: i, e., we need to have a Peninsula-centered historical view putting together the continent and the sea.
First of all, there is an argument that the feature of this policy was nothing but to reflect shift in power balance in the Korean Peninsula, but this point of view appears to have been arisen from a misled conception in which one will not understand Peninsula-centered character of our national history in a proper sense. We shouldn't judge this policy of southward advance by the perspective of northward advance as if it were the absolute one. We may also evaluate Koguryo's development affirmatively after the transfer of its capital to P'yongyang, in such respects as the increase of its population and fruitful harvest of 5 kinds of grains, etc. The transfer of its capital also made a great contribution to building a national identity by sharing food, clothes and shelter in common. So Koguryo's southward advance was not just a result of a change in political power but also a beginning in the building process of Korean nationality. In this respect, studying King Horae's Stele is of great importance in the close examination of this process.
Secondly, the transfer of Koguryo's capital and subcapital to the Daedong River and Central region of Korean Peninsula, respectively, can be seen to have been the result of the change in its national character. Therefore, it is a great error to look upon Koguryo just as a state centered on the Korean Peninsula or to consider Manchuria and Korean Peninsula separately. Here, in this article, I put a great emphasis on the folloing ponint: i, e., we need to have a Peninsula-centered historical view putting together the continent and the sea.
#고구려
#광개토호태왕비
#남진정책
#한반도 중심적 발전
#민개토착(民皆土着)
#5곡풍속
#의식주공유의 정체성
#Koguryo
#King Kwanggaeto Hotae's Stele
#Policy of Southward Advance
#Development centered on the Korean Peninsula
#Fruitful Harvest of 5 Kinds of Grains
#apeople settling domin in the land
#Identity of holding Food
#Clothes and Shelter in common
목차
Ⅰ. 序-호태왕비 연구 현황과 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 비문의 사실 확인과 재인식
Ⅲ. 연구 경향성과 문제점
Ⅳ. 結-정체성과 사관과 비의 의미
〈Abstract〉
『동아시아에서 (특히 한국사)에서 廣開土好太王碑 연구의 역사적 의미』討論文
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
韓國의 硏究史를 通해서 본 高句麗 正體性 問題
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려 남진정책의 성격과 그 영향- 평양기 고구려 천하의 위상과 의의 -
대구사학
2009 .01
-
韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
高句麗史
성곡논총
1997 .07
-
고구려 中期天下觀의 推移
고구려발해연구
2008 .03
-
4~5세기 고구려에 유입된 중국계 인물의 동향-문헌자료를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2003 .12
-
中國 內 高句麗遺蹟에서 出土된 高句麗土器 硏究
중국사연구
2007 .01
-
高句麗 '民族'問題 認識의 現況과 課題
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
신라 訥祗王代 고구려세력의 축출과 그 배경
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
중화인민공화국 학계의 고구려 유민 연구 검토
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
『集安高句麗碑』의 발견과 내용에 대한 考察
고구려발해연구
2013 .03
-
신채호의 고구려사 인식 : 북한에 미친 영향을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2009 .03
-
北方民族史에서 본 高句麗의 正體性 : 鮮卑, 契丹, 柔然을 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
[기획1 : 한ㆍ중 역사인식의 접점] 「광개토왕릉비」에 나타난 고구려의 대중인식(對中認識)과 대외정책
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
中國學界의 高句麗 對外關係史 硏究現況
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려 후기 고구려, 수ㆍ당, 북방 제국의 대립관계
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
壁畵를 通해서 본 高句麗의 옷차림文化 : 中國 및 北方地域과의 比較를 中心으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .06
-
고구려와 북방민족의 관계에 대한 중화인민공화국 학계의 견해
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
고구려 발해의 상관성 연구와 과제
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019487768