메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
부산대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 法學硏究 第43卷 第1號 通卷 第51號
발행연도
2002.12
수록면
283 - 304 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In cyber-space, Copyright Law faced unexpected problems caused by new technologies. As the current system of copyright was established without considering new technologies, it cannot settle the problems only with the current system. P2P file-sharing technology is one of the representative examples involving the relationships between copyright and technologies.
P2P technology allows users to search, copy, transfer files that are stored on other’s hard drives to own the files in common. It helps to realize free distribution of information in cyber-space through the information decentralized system. At the same time, it makes users easily to infringe copyright of works and also makes difficult to protect copyright owner.
P2P technology can be developed in enormous area in near the future, for examples, it can provide the environment which enables limited community to share it’s files directly, combining with other technologies, it can be used in e-business, like shopping mall or internet auction. Besides it makes a contribution to realize sharing of information between netizens.
In the contrary, it has some dark sides. P2P service provides the environment which enables it’s users to transfer the files which are protected by the copyright without any permission. Moreover, through the development of circumventive technologies, it disturbs the current system of copyright. In the case of Napster, as the central server existed and it could control the users through the server, copyright owner can insist the responsibility of the service provider. But in the cases of Gnutella or Freenet, they don’t have any central server and information transfers are autonomous and anonymous. So copyright owner cannot find the target to ask the responsibility.
There can be several questions.
1. Current system of copyright law can be maintained under the P2P technologies? The current copyright law which makes most of users around the world the offenders must be examined in view of digitalized network to enhance the effect of copyright law.
2. The files-transfer between users under the P2p system can be considered as fair use so that they can be exempted from the charge of infringement of copyright? Under the constitution, copyright has been protected from other’s infringements giving the exclusive rights to copyright-holder. It is natural that this rule is applied equally to cyber-space and users have to accept the concepts of copyright under the constitution. However, there are some differences to exercise copyright law in cyber-space.
3. P2P service can be exempted from the responsibility of supporter because of it’s circumventive technology? Under current system, it needs to discuss in case by case. Most service providers adopting hybrid P2P technology cannot escape the responsibility of infringement of copyright as a supporters. But in the case of pure P2P service, there are not any legal, technological resolutions. Moreover this area will be expanded with the development of circumventive technologies.
Finally, the discussion of the infringement of copyright causing by P2P service should not be limited in legal, technologica1 aspects.
The legal system of copyright has to provide the reasonable standards of copyright in cyber-space, and copyright holders have to make their own protective methods. The most important thing to protect copyright is the change of market. The established market must try to be suited to new system of market in cyber-space.
“Make the content easier and cheaper to buy than to steal” gives us one of the resolutions in cyber-space market to protect both the sharing of information and the guarantee of copyright.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. P2P
Ⅲ. 냅스터 사건(A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster Inc.)
Ⅳ. 우리나라 저작권법상 P2P서비스의 규제
Ⅴ. 결론 - P2P서비스에 대한 향후 대웅책
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-019483914