지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.12
- 수록면
- 115 - 134 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The plea for the adversary system is that it elicits a reasonable approximation of the truth. The reasoning is that with each side on its mettle to present its own case and to challenge its opponent’s, the relevant unprivileged evidence in the main emerges in the ensuing clash. Such reasoning is hardly realistic unless the evidence is accessible in advance to the adversaries so that each can prepare according in the light of such evidence.
Discovery is the process by which a party obtains before trial information and other materials relevant to a pending lawsuit.
Surprise is the enemy of truth. The criminal trial should not be characterized as a mere game in which the parties are controlled by rules constructed solely to create a balance between the two sides. Rather, the proceeding should be directed toward uncovering truth, and the merits of any proposed change in discovery rules should be judged according to the potential of the change toward promoting this objective.
And liberal discovery far from abetting, actually deters perjury and fabrication. The true safeguard against perjury is the inquiry should be so conducted as to separate and distinguish the one from the other where both are present. What is significant is that in those jurisdictions that have adopted discovery procedures, the trend is toward expansion rather than restriction or abandonment.
The general and direct articles on criminal discovery are not deary stipulated in the Korean law of criminal procedure. However, considering the constitutional spirits, the nature of the adversary system, and each article in that law, criminal discovery can be admitted.
On legislation, the Federal. Rules of Criminal Procedure and ABA Standards Relating to Discovery and Procedure Before Trial will be served.
We think that reciprocal discovery should not be permitted in our nation, considering the privilege against self-incrimination, and the right to be silent of the defendant, and the imbalance of power between the accused and the prosecutor.
The work product doctrine should not be admitted easily. Although it is admitted, it seems to be desirable that the work product doctrine should be restricted to the opinion work product of ABA Standards type.
Pretrial discovery is very important for the guarantee of the tight of defense, ascertainment of truth, speedy trial, and so on. Therefore it should be admitted extensively.
Discovery is the process by which a party obtains before trial information and other materials relevant to a pending lawsuit.
Surprise is the enemy of truth. The criminal trial should not be characterized as a mere game in which the parties are controlled by rules constructed solely to create a balance between the two sides. Rather, the proceeding should be directed toward uncovering truth, and the merits of any proposed change in discovery rules should be judged according to the potential of the change toward promoting this objective.
And liberal discovery far from abetting, actually deters perjury and fabrication. The true safeguard against perjury is the inquiry should be so conducted as to separate and distinguish the one from the other where both are present. What is significant is that in those jurisdictions that have adopted discovery procedures, the trend is toward expansion rather than restriction or abandonment.
The general and direct articles on criminal discovery are not deary stipulated in the Korean law of criminal procedure. However, considering the constitutional spirits, the nature of the adversary system, and each article in that law, criminal discovery can be admitted.
On legislation, the Federal. Rules of Criminal Procedure and ABA Standards Relating to Discovery and Procedure Before Trial will be served.
We think that reciprocal discovery should not be permitted in our nation, considering the privilege against self-incrimination, and the right to be silent of the defendant, and the imbalance of power between the accused and the prosecutor.
The work product doctrine should not be admitted easily. Although it is admitted, it seems to be desirable that the work product doctrine should be restricted to the opinion work product of ABA Standards type.
Pretrial discovery is very important for the guarantee of the tight of defense, ascertainment of truth, speedy trial, and so on. Therefore it should be admitted extensively.
목차
Ⅰ. 글머리에
Ⅱ. 當事者主義와 證據開示
Ⅲ. 公訴狀-本主義와 證據開示
Ⅳ. 證據開示의 必要性
Ⅴ. 證據開示의 弊害論에 대한 檢討 -僞證, 證人脅迫ㆍ買收, 證據湮滅 등의 憂慮를 둘러싼 論議-
Ⅵ. 證據開示의 許容與否
Ⅶ. 證據開示의 節次, 規律
Ⅷ. 맺으며
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전자증거개시제도(E-Discovery)에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
형사소송법상 증거개시제도에 대한 법적 소고 : 헌법적 평가 및 미국제도와 비교하여
한양법학
2009 .02
-
형사증거개시제도에 관한 소고
중앙법학
1999 .06
-
형사증거개시제도에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2003 .12
-
미국 연방 민사소송규칙상의 전자적 자료의 증거개시에 관한 연구
비교사법
2008 .12
-
검사의 증거개시의무와 수사기록 열람․등사의 거부에 대한 규제방안
형사법연구
2009 .01
-
소송구조와 합리적인 형사소송의 방향
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
형사소송법 개정의 문제점 - 공판부분
형사법연구
2011 .01
-
형사소송의 구조와 검사, 피고인의 지위 - 당사자주의와 증거개시제도를 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2009 .01
-
형사절차상 전자증거개시제도(E-Discovery)의 증거개시 신청 방식에 관한 연구
형사정책연구
2018 .12
-
개정 형사소송법상 증거개시 제도
법학논총
2007 .08
-
미국 민사소송에서 증거개시의 역할과 한계, 한국에 도입가능성
미국헌법연구
2012 .12
-
Process Discovery on the Basis of Event Streams
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .04
-
New discoveries of Natural Gas in the Mediterranean and its Impact on International Relations (Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine)
Mediterranean review
2018 .01
-
중국 개정 형사소송법에서의 간이절차 연구
원광법학
2013 .01
-
‘Discovery’ of the Korean alphabet in 19th century
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-019483989