지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Macroeconomic logistics costs in Korea have been released every year. In order to compile data for establishing the national logistics policy, macroeconomic logistics costs of 1998 was estimated, and the change and the trend of the individual element affecting logistics costs were analyzed between 1987 and 1998. National statistics published by creditable institutes were used for determining the costs of the major logistics functions: transportation, storage and inventory, packing, load and unloading, logistics information and administration. Total expenditure on logistics took 16.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1998, compared to 15.4% in 1997, 14.8% in 1994, and 13.8% in 1988. This rapid growth of logistics costs by percentage of GOP since 1988 mainly results from an increase in transportation costs.
However, there are some difficulties between America and Japan's classification items and those of Korea, even if it is similar that they are classified by each function as the case of America and Japan, because they are classified into transport, storage and inventory and administration costs. Because of it, the comparisons of international logistics costs can make lead some problems. Namely, load and unloading, packing and logistic information costs not calculated in America and Japan are being calculated in Korea.
Therefore, this paper aims to present the way of improvement for the comparison to logistics costs of other countries and those of Korea. So for it, firstly to make clear the factors of the logistic costs by sections, secondly to analyse change between logistics costs of other significant countries and those of Korea by sections through the examples of calculation of the significant international logistics costs.
The results are as followings;
1) To need to unify the costs in order to compare among logistics costs of other significant countries in the future after considering whether the logistics costs of the first industry related to the agriculture and fisheries and outport logistic costs can be included in the calculation of the national logistics costs or not.
2) To prepare the way of the improvement for the sections of the national logistics system which are worse than advanced others after analysing the contradiction not total national logistics costs with GOP but the national logistics costs by sections(transport costs, storage and inventory costs and administration costs) with GOP.
3) To change ideas, namely, in case of comparison among countries which have similar levels of national economy, it can be said that national logistic costs is high, because the ratio of logistics costs of the advanced countries by GOP is 10% and the ratio of Korea is 16%. But in case of comparison with other countries which have different levels of national economy including labor cost and land cost economy, it becomes difficult to prove that the national logistics costs are 「high costs structure」. Therefore, in the future, it is needed to search for the new way of the international comparison by productivity indices(freight weight, labor hour, the working population etc.) able to explain the inefficiency of the logistics costs of countries than 「high cost structure」.
However, there are some difficulties between America and Japan's classification items and those of Korea, even if it is similar that they are classified by each function as the case of America and Japan, because they are classified into transport, storage and inventory and administration costs. Because of it, the comparisons of international logistics costs can make lead some problems. Namely, load and unloading, packing and logistic information costs not calculated in America and Japan are being calculated in Korea.
Therefore, this paper aims to present the way of improvement for the comparison to logistics costs of other countries and those of Korea. So for it, firstly to make clear the factors of the logistic costs by sections, secondly to analyse change between logistics costs of other significant countries and those of Korea by sections through the examples of calculation of the significant international logistics costs.
The results are as followings;
1) To need to unify the costs in order to compare among logistics costs of other significant countries in the future after considering whether the logistics costs of the first industry related to the agriculture and fisheries and outport logistic costs can be included in the calculation of the national logistics costs or not.
2) To prepare the way of the improvement for the sections of the national logistics system which are worse than advanced others after analysing the contradiction not total national logistics costs with GOP but the national logistics costs by sections(transport costs, storage and inventory costs and administration costs) with GOP.
3) To change ideas, namely, in case of comparison among countries which have similar levels of national economy, it can be said that national logistic costs is high, because the ratio of logistics costs of the advanced countries by GOP is 10% and the ratio of Korea is 16%. But in case of comparison with other countries which have different levels of national economy including labor cost and land cost economy, it becomes difficult to prove that the national logistics costs are 「high costs structure」. Therefore, in the future, it is needed to search for the new way of the international comparison by productivity indices(freight weight, labor hour, the working population etc.) able to explain the inefficiency of the logistics costs of countries than 「high cost structure」.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국가물류비 산정과 구성요소
Ⅲ. 국가물류비의 추이분석 및 시사점
Ⅳ. 결론 및 정책건의
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서울시의 지역물류비 산정 및 추이분석
서울도시연구
2004 .09
-
임상병리과의 활동기준원가 관리 적용에 관한 연구
한국병원경영학회지
2000 .01
-
A Study on the Cost Accounting Practice in Korean Small and Medium Businesses
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2008 .05
-
기업 물류비용의 실증적 분석을 통한 공급사슬 전략의 도입 효과분석
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2007 .11
-
기업 물류비용의 실증적 분석을 통한 공급사슬 전략의 도입 효과분석
경영과학
2008 .07
-
상황변수와 물류비 관리시스템간의 적합도가 물류성과에 미치는 영향
대한경영학회지
2001 .12
-
기업물류비의 효율적 관리방안
국제회계연구
2008 .06
-
기업물류비의 전략적 관리방안
국제회계연구
2006 .11
-
한국제조기업의 비대칭적 원가행태
경영학연구
2004 .06
-
국제기업의 온라인물류정보시스템 활용에 관한 연구
경영교육연구
2002 .06
-
충북의 물류비용 분석 및 정책 추진방향
연구보고서
2010 .12
-
2017년 장애인고용기업 추가비용 조사
위탁과제보고서
2017 .10
-
녹내장 질병비용 연구를 통해 살펴본 질병비용 산출 쟁점
보건경제와 정책연구
2019 .01
-
Status and Factors Analysis on Logistics Cost of Chinese Enterprises
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .09
-
물류환경요인에 따른 물류비용절감에 관한 연구
한국경영교육학회 학술발표대회논문집
2009 .12
-
단체 급식소 원가 구조에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2005 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-322-019436373