지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper studies urban restructuring of two American industrial cities, that is, Pittsburgh and Detroit, focused on a concept of governance. This paper tries to explain why Pittsburgh has shown different path and social results of urban restructuring, compared with Detroit.
Since 1970, Pittsburgh has succeeded in regenerating central business district and improving the economic condition of neighborhoods. In contrast to Pittsburgh, Detroit has failed to regenerate central business district, even though major resources of city government has been poured on it. In addition to this, Pittsburgh has shown better social results in terms of income level, unemployment rate, and poverty ratio, compared to Detroit.
This paper adopts an analytical scheme that combines structural variables with actor variables to explain differences of urban restructuring. This paper is distinguished in considering following variables.
First, this paper considers social factor(= race), and institutional and cultural factor(= political arena) besides economic factor(= competitiveness of main industry) among structural variables.
Second, this paper shows that specific type of governance is a main variable to explain differences of urban restructuring. Governance is composed of various actors who actively responds to the crisis of the cities.
In conclusion, under specific structural conditions, the characteristics of governance that is composed of diverse actors deeply influence a path and social results of urban restructuring. This suggests for Korean cases in that characteristics of urban restructuring depends upon how governance is formed under specific structural conditions.
Since 1970, Pittsburgh has succeeded in regenerating central business district and improving the economic condition of neighborhoods. In contrast to Pittsburgh, Detroit has failed to regenerate central business district, even though major resources of city government has been poured on it. In addition to this, Pittsburgh has shown better social results in terms of income level, unemployment rate, and poverty ratio, compared to Detroit.
This paper adopts an analytical scheme that combines structural variables with actor variables to explain differences of urban restructuring. This paper is distinguished in considering following variables.
First, this paper considers social factor(= race), and institutional and cultural factor(= political arena) besides economic factor(= competitiveness of main industry) among structural variables.
Second, this paper shows that specific type of governance is a main variable to explain differences of urban restructuring. Governance is composed of various actors who actively responds to the crisis of the cities.
In conclusion, under specific structural conditions, the characteristics of governance that is composed of diverse actors deeply influence a path and social results of urban restructuring. This suggests for Korean cases in that characteristics of urban restructuring depends upon how governance is formed under specific structural conditions.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 비교연구의 분석틀
Ⅲ. 산업과 인종, 그리고 정치 공간
Ⅳ. 거버넌스와 도시재구조화
Ⅴ. 도시재구조화의 사회적 결과
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Shift in Urban Governance in Response To Global Restructuring : The Korean Policy Regimes Drifting towards a Pro-market Ethics
한국지역개발학회지
2000 .12
-
도시 거버넌스의 이론과 적용
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2001 .02
-
자본재구조화가 도시발달에 미치는 영향 : 시카고 정치와 재개발사업을 사례로 ( The Implication of Capital Restructuring on Urban Development : Chicago Politics as the Local Contingent Factor for Urban Restructuring )
대한지리학회지
1994 .12
-
Urban Governance of East Asian Cities in the Era of Glocalization : A Comparative Study of Urban Development Strategy among Pusan, Osaka, and Shanghai
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2005 .04
-
유럽의 기업지배구조와 노동자 대표
사회과학논총
2006 .02
-
从“愁城难解”到“城人之美” ― 基于湖北省武汉市流动摊贩的治理新模式探究
중국학논총
2017 .01
-
A Restructuring of Higher Educational Institutions in Korea
[KEDI] 한국교육
2001 .06
-
기업구조조정의 득과 실 : 기업가치와의 상호관계를 중심으로
대한경영학회지
2008 .04
-
공공 거버넌스의 유형: 모델링을 위한 메타분석을 중심으로
국정관리연구
2018 .01
-
구조조정제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 : 합병 및 분사제도를 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2002 .02
-
기업구조조정 : 선행요인과 구조조정 성과에 관한 비판적 고찰
경영학연구
2003 .12
-
정부중재형 거버넌스 체제의 운영전략에 관한 연구 : 이해관계자들의 범위와 역할, 그리고 거버넌스 역량의 결정요인을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2003 .11
-
미국 피츠버그시의 IT 지역혁신환경 : 대학과 지식공유 허브의 기능을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2005 .06
-
Major Details of Financial Sector Restructuring in 2003
[BOK] Quarterly Bulletin(QB)
2004 .03
-
전파법의 Restructuring 관련 쟁점 연구
경제규제와 법
2015 .11
-
Korean Economic Restructuring: Evaluation and Prospects
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1998 .11
-
Performance Consequences of Corporate Restructuring
전략경영연구
2004 .06
-
Industrial Restructuring and Spatial Development in Korea , 1983-1993
지역연구
1998 .12
-
마산시 도시재생사업 거버넌스의 특성과 평가에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-322-002101526