지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Space in modern society is governed by power and capital. A. Lefebvre said that “Space is production.”, which implicates these relationship between power and capital. The objective of this study is to look into the cultural politics of space in the novels released in the late 1960s and in the early and mid 1970s based on these recognition and understanding.
The cultural politics of space approaches from three angles when it comes to space: space, subject, power. Accordingly, the cultural politics of space includes various social discourses surrounding space as well as discussions over space as a specific place.
In the 1960s and 1970s with Seoul, Republic of Korea as the center, the rearrangement of space accordingto social class of space had been progressed rapidly in Korean society. The characteristics of the period is that the extension and rearrangement of space of the period, which are dubbed as political dictatorship period since development was made under militarybacked dictatorship in the name of development especially developing countries, were done via the development focusing on speed formed by power. Through these developments focusing on speed, then those who have power have appealed to the general public that the classification of space according to social class could be justifiable. They did minimize resistance against their propaganda by guaranteeing the convenience and freedom of moving. It is fallacious these propagandasincrease only culture consumption as are verified in the novels by Lee Dong Ha, Choi Il Nam, and Choi In Ho.
The general public never governs space and the general public never becomes the subject of space production. They are mere a consumer who consume the space and culture produced by the governing classes. The problem is that the culturepolitics of space in the 1960s and 1970s’ novels does reveal the features until the present day with the same aspects. Therefore, the culture politics of space analyzed through this article can be defined as not a discussion about historical facts but a discussion about current situations of the culture politics of space.
The cultural politics of space approaches from three angles when it comes to space: space, subject, power. Accordingly, the cultural politics of space includes various social discourses surrounding space as well as discussions over space as a specific place.
In the 1960s and 1970s with Seoul, Republic of Korea as the center, the rearrangement of space accordingto social class of space had been progressed rapidly in Korean society. The characteristics of the period is that the extension and rearrangement of space of the period, which are dubbed as political dictatorship period since development was made under militarybacked dictatorship in the name of development especially developing countries, were done via the development focusing on speed formed by power. Through these developments focusing on speed, then those who have power have appealed to the general public that the classification of space according to social class could be justifiable. They did minimize resistance against their propaganda by guaranteeing the convenience and freedom of moving. It is fallacious these propagandasincrease only culture consumption as are verified in the novels by Lee Dong Ha, Choi Il Nam, and Choi In Ho.
The general public never governs space and the general public never becomes the subject of space production. They are mere a consumer who consume the space and culture produced by the governing classes. The problem is that the culturepolitics of space in the 1960s and 1970s’ novels does reveal the features until the present day with the same aspects. Therefore, the culture politics of space analyzed through this article can be defined as not a discussion about historical facts but a discussion about current situations of the culture politics of space.
목차
1. 서론 : 공간과 권력, 그리고 문화정치학
2. 자본화된 공간의 위상
3. 공간의 정치학과 공간 이동의 환상
4. 공간에 구현된 문화정치학
5. 결론을 대신해서 : 1960-70년대 공간의 문화정치학이 남긴 과제
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공간과 예술, 몸 : 탈신체화와 재신체화
새한영어영문학
2008 .02
-
사유할 수 없는 미래/도시를 그리는 방법 - 박민규의 <핑퐁>을 중심으로
도시인문학연구
2017 .01
-
차이의 공간화와 타자의 정치학
새한영어영문학
2004 .03
-
황순원 단편소설에 나타나는 공간 연구
구보학보
2018 .01
-
고전소설에 나타난 사찰공간의 실상과 활용양상
우리말글
2003 .12
-
광장의 권력과 기억 공동체
남도문화연구
2018 .01
-
제3의 공간으로서의 카페 : 스페이스 마케팅의 관점
주관성 연구
2008 .06
-
근대의 자연 공간과 인식 공간
철학연구
2010 .12
-
1960년대 도시 소설의 장소상실과 기획 공간 : 최인훈과 김승옥의 경우
어문논총
2014 .06
-
Production of Space and Locality
Localities
2012 .11
-
“空间转向”与叙事空间
중국학논총
2020 .01
-
Consuming Spaces in the Global Era : Distinctions between Consumer Spaces in Seoul
Korea Journal
2004 .09
-
인간에게 공간이란 무엇인가?
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2007 .08
-
인간에게 공간이란 무엇인가?
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2007 .08
-
헤테로토피아: (탈)근대 공간 이해를 위한 시론
대구사학
2009 .01
-
〈심청전〉의 空間 問題와 理念의 機能
어문학
2007 .03
-
Spatial Relativity on The Great Gatsby and About Time
신영어영문학
2016 .02
-
공간에 관한 존재론적 역설과 전환 — 동아시아 사유를 통한 대안적 공간 접근 —
동양철학연구
2017 .01
-
비물질적 노동에 의한 공간의 재전유 : M. 하이데거, D. 매시, M. 하트를 중심으로
코기토
2017 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
도시 문명에 갇힌 인간 소외와 상실감 : 최인호의 「타인의 방」을 중심으로
이희경
동서언론
2012
.02
탈주체적 등장인물 연구 : 최인호와 김영하의 단편소설을 중심으로
곽상순
한국근대문학연구
2007
.04
도시 속 개인의 허무의식과 새로운 감수성 : 최인호의 「타인의 방」을 중심으로
오창은
어문론집
2004
.12
일상적 장소성과 관계적 공간성의 두 변증법 : 『서울 , 어느 날 소설이 되다』와 『서울, 밤의 산책자들』을 중심으로
조명기
어문론집
2012
.06
이효석 소설의 도시공간과 작가의식
김종건
통일인문학
2004
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0