지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.6
- 수록면
- 147 - 171 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In many countries, social investment viewpoints are very much emphasized in diverse areas of social policies. This trends are related with many factors, such as high unemployment rates, growing numbers of the old population, and inefficiencies of the old social welfare systems. Even though Korea is at the stage where the net level of welfare expenditure should be increased, Korean society is also facing the above mentioned social problems which should be solved by new social policies. Thus, it is helpful for Korean society to review the realities, problems, and featuring characteristics of social investment policies among major countries where those policies were already implemented, in order to get useful framework to evaluate many policy alternatives Korean society might adopt.
This study reviews social investment policies among western welfare countries according to the three major welfare regimes-liberal, conservative, and social democratic. The findings show that countries in liberal welfare regime, such as Canada, England, and the US, increase the level of total expenditures spending social investment policies and emphasize the role of private sectors providing welfare services. Conservative welfare regime also strongly underscores the policies focusing on social investment viewpoints. Sweden and Denmark, the countries representing social democratic welfare regime do not show the dramatic change in old welfare systems, but try to increase the efficiencies of welfare systems and the number of service providers.
The study also analyses social investment policies among major western countries according to the policy objectives-children, women, and the elderly. Children are the most important welfare beneficiaries in the social investment policies. Care services and educational services for younger children are very much emphasized in most countries. For women, many institutional changes and new services increasing the possibilities managing "work and family" are found in many countries. Actually the services for children and for women are interwound with each other. The polices for the elderly include job training services and social care services. In most countries these policies for the elderly are considered as highly urgent policies.
This study reviews social investment policies among western welfare countries according to the three major welfare regimes-liberal, conservative, and social democratic. The findings show that countries in liberal welfare regime, such as Canada, England, and the US, increase the level of total expenditures spending social investment policies and emphasize the role of private sectors providing welfare services. Conservative welfare regime also strongly underscores the policies focusing on social investment viewpoints. Sweden and Denmark, the countries representing social democratic welfare regime do not show the dramatic change in old welfare systems, but try to increase the efficiencies of welfare systems and the number of service providers.
The study also analyses social investment policies among major western countries according to the policy objectives-children, women, and the elderly. Children are the most important welfare beneficiaries in the social investment policies. Care services and educational services for younger children are very much emphasized in most countries. For women, many institutional changes and new services increasing the possibilities managing "work and family" are found in many countries. Actually the services for children and for women are interwound with each other. The polices for the elderly include job training services and social care services. In most countries these policies for the elderly are considered as highly urgent policies.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 주요국가의 사회투자정책
Ⅲ. 정책대상별 사회투자정책의 현황과 방향
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Role of Social Policy in the Welfare State
법학연구
1973 .07
-
북한의 노동복지법제 비교분석: 로동법과 외국인투자기업로동법을 중심으로
통일과 평화
2018 .01
-
The Analytic Framework of Social Policy
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2015 .02
-
정책산출, 국가 그리고 사회보장
노동연구
1994 .09
-
미국의 사회적 돌봄서비스 제공주체 구성의 변화 : Home Health와 Nursing Home 서비스를 중심으로
한국사회과학연구
2011 .06
-
영국 사회투자국가의 성과와 과제 : 아동정책을 중심으로
비판사회정책
2007 .08
-
생산적 복지정책의 효과 분석
한국사회와 행정연구
2005 .05
-
Contextual Factors in Korea's Social Welfare Policy
한국사회과학연구
1997 .12
-
사회복지 이념적 모형을 통해 본 김대중 정부의 아동보육정책 평가
한국영유아보육학
2003 .06
-
한국 지방정부의 사회복지예산정책에 관한 실태분석 : 경기도 사례 분석을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2006 .02
-
사회복지예산운동의 전개과정과 과제
한국사회과학연구
2006 .12
-
근로연계복지와 사회적 시민권에 관한 소고 : 미국 복지개혁을 중심으로
한국사회과학연구
2006 .06
-
사회복지서비스 제공의 역할분담 모형
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .02
-
The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Enterprises in Welfare State Regime : The Case of South Korea
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2008 .12
-
민간사회복지서비스 전달체계의 활성화 방안
지역개발연구
2006 .12
-
사회복지 분야의 운동적 성격 및 NGO적 위상을 통해 본 사회복지사의 역할
지역사회연구
2008 .03
-
Democracy and Productive Welfare: European and Korean Welfare Policy Development in Perspective
Korea and the World Economy
2002 .03
-
Social Investment for Older People - Lesson from UK and Implications for Korea -
한국비교정부학보
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019541387