메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第25卷 第3號
발행연도
2009.3
수록면
187 - 196 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study has the purpose to reveal the differences of the factors influencing residents where to move and to choose. The three new residential areas in Cheongju-city and Cheongwon-gun, with differentiated development concepts, were the fields for the study. In the development projects in the middle-sized cities, the outcomes of the study may supply some criteria on the lot decision or the residential environment considerations. For the study, 663 housewives residing in the three residential areas answered the questionnaire. The 3 residential areas had differentiated development concepts; (1) residential area in the downtown, (2) government-residence compound area in the downtown, and (3) industry-residence compound area in the outskirts. Followings are the results of the study. 1) There exist differences in the household characteristics, so that it is needed to differentiate the development concept according to the needs of the expected residents. 2) The 4 factors (inner environmental, outer environmental, economic, and traffic factors) influencing the residential mobility showed less score than the mean, and the outer environment factor got the highest score. The educational environment element, overwhelming others, was considered as the most important in every residential area, and the fact means that the sufficient supply of educational institutes is prerequisite for the area development. On the other hand, the importance of the traffic factor varied from area to area. 3) In the actual residential choice, they answered more influenced by the 4 factors, showing higher score than the mean. The inner environment factor scored highest in all residential areas, implying that improvement of the inner space is very important. The outer conveniences and educational environment elements showed inconsistent scores, which means that these facilities have to be supplied matching the family lifecycle of expected residents. The unevenness in the traffic factor is mainly from the need of easier access to job, so the systematic traffic should be set in the area or inter-area.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구방법
4. 조사결과 및 분석
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0