지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.9
- 수록면
- 225 - 254 (32page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This report analyzed the background, progress, details, and results of the four sets of negotiations that were initiated by Samyoungdang and Chungjung during the Japanese Invasion in the years 1592-1598. The common view that Poungshinsoogil (豊臣秀吉) broke off the treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty from rage because of Hangjang (行長) and the Ming Dynasty’s attempt to elect a king for Japan is examined by reviewing the negotiation procedure that took place between Samyoungdang and Chungjung.
The analysis reveals that the primary goal of the Samyoungdang-Chungjung Negotiations was to break the relationship between Poungshinsoogil and Chungjung and that of Chungjung and Hangjang through a diplomatic conference; the results did not meet up to expectations. However, through these negotiations, the nature and the process of the ongoing peace treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty was examined, the standing of Chosun, in comparison, was reinforced and the fallacy behind the Japan-Ming treaty was revealed and emphasized. All this contributed to the eventual abolishment of the Japan-Ming Dynasty’s peace treaty. As a result, one may conclude that the negotiations between Samyoungdang and Chungjung were short yet successful from the standpoint that it was able to abolish the peace treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty, which may have been its main motive! Through the negotiations of Samyoungdang and Chungjung, the intentions of Poungshinsoogil were revealed and the conditions between Hangjang and Shimyookyung (沈惟敬) were publicly disclosed to Chosun and to the Ming Dynasty, which contributed to the abolishment of the treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty. In Japan, through the influence of Chongjung, the information was spread to Poungshinsoogil which facilitated the nullification of the Japan-Ming peace treaty.
Subsequently, Samyoungdang had many accomplishments during the lmjin War and earned the trust of Japan. When the war ended in 1604, Samyoungdang was delegated as the representative to establish the peace treaty between Chosun and Japan (江戶幕府) and through that process he helped build a formal diplomatic relationship between the two nations.
The analysis reveals that the primary goal of the Samyoungdang-Chungjung Negotiations was to break the relationship between Poungshinsoogil and Chungjung and that of Chungjung and Hangjang through a diplomatic conference; the results did not meet up to expectations. However, through these negotiations, the nature and the process of the ongoing peace treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty was examined, the standing of Chosun, in comparison, was reinforced and the fallacy behind the Japan-Ming treaty was revealed and emphasized. All this contributed to the eventual abolishment of the Japan-Ming Dynasty’s peace treaty. As a result, one may conclude that the negotiations between Samyoungdang and Chungjung were short yet successful from the standpoint that it was able to abolish the peace treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty, which may have been its main motive! Through the negotiations of Samyoungdang and Chungjung, the intentions of Poungshinsoogil were revealed and the conditions between Hangjang and Shimyookyung (沈惟敬) were publicly disclosed to Chosun and to the Ming Dynasty, which contributed to the abolishment of the treaty between Japan and the Ming Dynasty. In Japan, through the influence of Chongjung, the information was spread to Poungshinsoogil which facilitated the nullification of the Japan-Ming peace treaty.
Subsequently, Samyoungdang had many accomplishments during the lmjin War and earned the trust of Japan. When the war ended in 1604, Samyoungdang was delegated as the representative to establish the peace treaty between Chosun and Japan (江戶幕府) and through that process he helped build a formal diplomatic relationship between the two nations.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 朝日회담의 배경
Ⅲ. 서생포회담의 내용
Ⅳ. 서생포회담의 결과
Ⅴ. 나오며
참고문헌
English Abstract
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
壬辰亂 後 朝鮮 對明 認識의 變化 : ‘再造之恩’을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2006 .12
-
임진왜란 직후, 대일강화정책의 성격연구
한국사연구
2007 .09
-
한국 강제병합 과정에 대한 재조명 : 한일구조약의 불법·무효성에 관한 법학적 연구
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
아베시대 일·러 영토교섭 -1956년 일소공동선언을 중심으로-
슬라브학보
2019 .12
-
戰後 韓日관계와 샌프란시스코 平和條約
한국사연구
2005 .12
-
임진전쟁 강화교섭 전반기(1593.6~1594.12), 조선과 명의 갈등에 관한 연구
한국사연구
2014 .09
-
[특집2 : 1960년대 한반도와 국제정세] 한·일협정 체결과 '지역통합전략'의 현실화 - 한·미·일 3국의 인식과 대응을 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
[조선 전기] 조선전기사 연구의 현황과 과제(2015~2016)
역사학보
2017 .09
-
조약법을 통해 본 1910년 병합조약의 무효 : 강제에 의한 조약의 효력을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
푸틴-아베시대 러-일 평화조약 체결교섭에서 본 분쟁4도의 군사안보적 중요성
슬라브학보
2020 .09
-
1910년 한일조약에 대한 법사학적 재검토
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
李德馨의 임진왜란 중 외교 활동
한국인물사연구
2007 .03
-
朝英條約(1883. 11)과 불평등조약체제의 재정립
한국사연구
2006 .12
-
특사 태프트의 제2차 대일방문과 미일조약체제, 1907~1908 : 한국병합을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
Treaties Leading to Japan’s Annexation of Korea : What Are the Problems?
Korea Journal
2016 .12
-
한국 지식인의 대일인식과 한일회담
한국사연구
2005 .12
-
鄭夢周與明人的交遊 - 以 ≪圃隱集≫ 為中心 -
포은학연구
2014 .01
-
王陽明與日本關係新考
동아인문학
2005 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001726564