지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article researched the throne succession of early Silla and the existence of three royal descendents, and it applied three principles that is legitimate succession, collateral succession, and son-in-law succession.
First, the throne succession of Park(박) royal family kept being developed in direct line succession and son-in-law succession, there was no collateral succession. In beginning, two groups of Park royal family, marrying with the king of the other country, concentrated powers.
Secondly, Talhae(탈해) king has meant to succeed the throne as son-in-law of Park royal family, but it just suggests the fact that the existence time of Seok(석) royal descendents is the same time of Park royal descendents. Marriages of the Seok royal family was consanguineous marriage inside the most royal family. The throne succession of them kept being developed in three principles.
Thirdly, Michu(미추) king has meant to succeed the throne as son-in-law of Seok royal family, but it just suggests the fact that the existence time of Kim royal descendents is the same time of Seok royal descendents.
Samkuksaki is the basic source of Silla history. The early document is belong to the age prior to king Nae-Mul(奈勿王). This document has caused many debates among scholars because of its ambiguous character.
According to early document the beginning of Silla is 57 B.C. But when I analyzed the age gaps between generations, I found that the real beginning was 220 dynasty but that of Saroguk. It is not true that three names Park, Seok, Kim succeeded to Saroguk throne in turns. In Saroguk, two royal families of Park and Seok co-existed, and in Silla founded in the mid-fourth century Kims became a royal family succeeding to Parks.
Some kind of scholars repaired a genealogy record and they interpreted, these methods are errors. We will change its records and there is not a necessity which we will interpret. There is a possibility of repairing the history which is knowing by mistake. Conclusively speaking, we consequently must trust the record of royal family genealogy.
First, the throne succession of Park(박) royal family kept being developed in direct line succession and son-in-law succession, there was no collateral succession. In beginning, two groups of Park royal family, marrying with the king of the other country, concentrated powers.
Secondly, Talhae(탈해) king has meant to succeed the throne as son-in-law of Park royal family, but it just suggests the fact that the existence time of Seok(석) royal descendents is the same time of Park royal descendents. Marriages of the Seok royal family was consanguineous marriage inside the most royal family. The throne succession of them kept being developed in three principles.
Thirdly, Michu(미추) king has meant to succeed the throne as son-in-law of Seok royal family, but it just suggests the fact that the existence time of Kim royal descendents is the same time of Seok royal descendents.
Samkuksaki is the basic source of Silla history. The early document is belong to the age prior to king Nae-Mul(奈勿王). This document has caused many debates among scholars because of its ambiguous character.
According to early document the beginning of Silla is 57 B.C. But when I analyzed the age gaps between generations, I found that the real beginning was 220 dynasty but that of Saroguk. It is not true that three names Park, Seok, Kim succeeded to Saroguk throne in turns. In Saroguk, two royal families of Park and Seok co-existed, and in Silla founded in the mid-fourth century Kims became a royal family succeeding to Parks.
Some kind of scholars repaired a genealogy record and they interpreted, these methods are errors. We will change its records and there is not a necessity which we will interpret. There is a possibility of repairing the history which is knowing by mistake. Conclusively speaking, we consequently must trust the record of royal family genealogy.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 박씨왕실의 왕위계승
Ⅱ. 석씨왕실의 왕위계승
Ⅲ. 신라 상고 삼성왕통의 실재성
맺음말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
신라의 왕위계승 원리
역사와 세계
2007 .12
-
신라 하대 왕위계승 관련자료의 분석과 이용
신라사학보
2007 .08
-
조선 초기의 왕위 계승
호서문화논총
2008 .09
-
조선 후기 선원보첩류의 편찬체제와 그 성격
장서각
2007 .06
-
족보에서 보는 왕실과의 혼인 기록과 계보 형태
장서각
2012 .04
-
조선 초기 王親婚 王室 妾子孫에 대한 사회적 인식
한국사학보
2012 .08
-
고려의 ‘不稱姓’의 특권과 王家
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
金昌謙 著, 《新羅 下代 王位繼承硏究》(景仁文化社, 서울) 2003.5, 496쪽
한국사연구
2003 .12
-
Royal Genealogical Records of the Joseon Royal Family
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2008 .06
-
미수 허목의 예송관
한국사상과 문화
2013 .01
-
신라왕실의 친족체계
동아문화
1977 .12
-
1826년 『예식통고(例式通攷)』의 편찬과 왕실재정의 정비 노력
역사와현실
2018 .03
-
신라 경순왕의 즉위를 통해 본 신라 하대의 왕위 계승 원리 : 혈연적 요인을 중심으로
서강인문논총
2019 .04
-
제정일치적 天降관념의 신라적 변용 ─인도 아쇼까왕과의 비교를 중심으로
불교학연구
2012 .01
-
신라의 왕위계승 원리에 대한 이론적 탐색 : 선석열, 『신라 왕위계승 원리 연구』(혜안, 2015)
한국고대사연구
2016 .12
-
다윗의 왕위계승사에 서술된 왕의 사법집행을 통해서 본 ‘아이러니화된 왕의 이데올로기’
구약논단
2017 .06
-
“ ” - 다윗 왕위 계승 순위의 뒤틀림
구약논단
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0