지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to the Constitution Art. 23, the right of property of all citizens shall be guaranteed. The contents and limitations thereof shall be determined by Acts. But, exceptionally the Constitution Clause 3, Art. 23 allows to deprive of property contrary to owner's will if only essential conditions is satisfied.
The Act on Acquisition and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Projects is a law which regulates expropriations, use or restriction of private property (especially real estate) from public necessity and compensation. Besides, the Act regulates in detail the committee of land expropriation, the formal objection and the right of repurchase, it is got into shape of completion.
The right of repurchase means that the former owner would apply to return the land, paying the regular price to the project developer if only the land is no more necessary by reason of abolition or alteration for public projects. It should be enacted by legislators in accordance with the request of the guarantee of property right in the Constitution. If this principle isn't observed, the right of repurchase system comes to a conclusion of unconstitutionality.
The Residential Site Development Promotion Act makes a application of the shorter time limit of request than the Act on Acquisition and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Projects. However, the right of repurchase in the Residential Site Development Promotion Act is ill founded in that it is based on insufficient public necessity. Furthermore, there is something uncertain in making use of it. Considering this problem, the right of repurchase which is expired in a year seems to be wholly contrary to the principle of the guarantee of property right in the Constitution.
If the right of repurchase which is expired in a year in the Residential Site Development Promotion Act is made adecision of the unconstitutionality, the right of repurchase in the Act on Acquisition and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Projects is applied to exercise right of repurchase or has to watch for legislation by the National Assembly. Finally, it is the matter that could be selected by the construction of law.
The Act on Acquisition and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Projects is a law which regulates expropriations, use or restriction of private property (especially real estate) from public necessity and compensation. Besides, the Act regulates in detail the committee of land expropriation, the formal objection and the right of repurchase, it is got into shape of completion.
The right of repurchase means that the former owner would apply to return the land, paying the regular price to the project developer if only the land is no more necessary by reason of abolition or alteration for public projects. It should be enacted by legislators in accordance with the request of the guarantee of property right in the Constitution. If this principle isn't observed, the right of repurchase system comes to a conclusion of unconstitutionality.
The Residential Site Development Promotion Act makes a application of the shorter time limit of request than the Act on Acquisition and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Projects. However, the right of repurchase in the Residential Site Development Promotion Act is ill founded in that it is based on insufficient public necessity. Furthermore, there is something uncertain in making use of it. Considering this problem, the right of repurchase which is expired in a year seems to be wholly contrary to the principle of the guarantee of property right in the Constitution.
If the right of repurchase which is expired in a year in the Residential Site Development Promotion Act is made adecision of the unconstitutionality, the right of repurchase in the Act on Acquisition and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Projects is applied to exercise right of repurchase or has to watch for legislation by the National Assembly. Finally, it is the matter that could be selected by the construction of law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 - 헌법상 재산권보장의 뜻
Ⅱ. 헌법과 환매제도
Ⅲ. 토지수용의 법체계
Ⅳ. 택촉법상 환매제도의 문제점
Ⅴ. 여론 - 택촉법의 일반적 문제점
Ⅵ. 결론
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
환매권 제한에 대한 법적 쟁점 -공익사업의 변환을 중심으로-
원광법학
2013 .01
-
자사주 매입방식의 결정요인과 기회주의 가설의 검증
경영학연구
2008 .10
-
재산권의 존속보장과 환매권
법학연구
2009 .08
-
Share Repurchases in Vietnam: Why Do Firms Repurchase Shares?
무역연구
2016 .01
-
債券補償의 實效性 提高方案
비교법학연구
2007 .09
-
공익사업의 변환과 환매권의 제한 대법원 판례 검토 - 대법원 2015. 8. 19. 선고 2014다201391 판결 -
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
SHARE REPURCHASES IN KOREA: WHY DO COMPANIES CARRY THEM OUT?
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2006 .07
-
SHARE REPURCHASES IN KOREA: WHY DO COMPANIES CARRY THEM OUT?
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2006 .07
-
徵發不動産所有權의 原狀回復에 관한 硏究
법학논총
2008 .02
-
공법상 영업손실보상의 개선방안에 관한 연구
도시행정학보
2012 .03
-
손실보상금의 종류와 과세소득의 구분
조세법연구
2015 .08
-
企業의 自己株式 取得制限과 取得動機에 관한 法·經濟學的 考察
기업법연구
2005 .03
-
업체탐방-(주)ACTS
프린팅코리아
2002 .01
-
대단위 토지개발사업 시행을 위한 대토보상제 도입방안 연구
도시행정학보
2007 .12
-
노동조합이 기업의 자사주매입에 미치는 영향
경영교육연구
2016 .10
-
농지개혁에 따른 분배대상 제외농지 환매의 문제점과 개선방안
주거환경
2009 .12
-
중국 및 인도 소비자들의 외국브랜드 제품에 대한 재구매의도 결정요인 비교연구
유통과학연구
2018 .01
-
Antecedents to Customer Repurchase in Korean Social Commerce Service
유통과학연구
2012 .01
-
외식상품 소셜커머스 마케팅이 재구매의도와경영성과에 미치는 영향
호텔리조트연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0