메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한림대학교 법학연구소 한림법학 FORUM 한림법학 FORUM 제14권
발행연도
2004.8
수록면
151 - 184 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Etymologically, euthanasia means easy or gentle death. One of the most widely discussed issues in the contemporary bioethics is euthanasia. Euthanasia is the administration of a lethal agent by another person to a patient for the purpose of relieving the patient intolerable and incurable suffering. Death with dignity is the model of voluntary and passive euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia means that the action is undertaken at the request of the patient, and should be distinguished from nonvoluntary euthanasia where the patient has not made or is not capable of making such a request. Involuntary euthanasia is the action performed against the patient’s wishes. Passive euthanasia involves the withdrawal of medical technologies in order to allow the underlying disease process to take its natural course. Passive euthanasia or death with dignity is typically contrasted with active euthanasia. Active euthanasia refers to the direct killing of the patient.
The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that is permissible, at least in some cases, to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. There is an important moral difference between active and passive euthanasia is that people think killing someone is morally worse than letting someone die. But to investigate this issue, two cases may be considered that are exactly alike except that one involves killing whereas the other involves letting someone die.
There are some needs of permitting ‘death with dignity’ that are now well accepted in medicine and law. Many factors have combined to create this more reasonable approach to ‘death with dignity’ ; the recognition that what is morally required ought to be, at the least, legally permitted; a widespread concern that the request for right to die come from a competent patient and the request is entirely voluntary without any coercion or incentive. In order to fully articulate all of the principles guiding the appropriate adopting of ‘death with dignity’, first there ought to be some changes of legal and moral acknowledge of good death and the patient’s right to die. At least where a well informed competent patient who is terminally ill and in intractable pain thoughtfully and repeatedly voluntary request medical intervention to end her life, medicine and law ought to allow for that aid or medical withdrawing. Medicine and law would agreed that a competent patient has a liberty interest in avoiding unwanted medical treatment. In deed next study would be focused at the formal and legal guidelines and of concrete condition of ‘death with dignity’.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 尊嚴死에 대한 개념정의
Ⅲ. 존엄사에서의 중요한 요소들
Ⅳ. 미국에서의 존엄사 및 의사조력자살과 관련된 사례와 법원의 결정
Ⅴ. 네덜란드와 미국의 尊嚴死 및 醫師助力自殺에 관한 입법
Ⅵ. 우리나라의 안락사, 치료중단에 대한 인식도 조사
Ⅶ. 결론

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0