지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.5
- 수록면
- 67 - 103 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.17068/lhc.2005.05.8.1.67
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There were four phases in the process of Hanyang’ s establishment as the capital of Chosun.
The debate on transfer of the capital to Namkyung, in late Koryo period, has its grounds on Feng-Shui theory, which asserted that the force of Kaekyung has diminished.
The transfer of capital to Hanyang, which was decided immediately after King Taejo has succeeded the throne, was influenced by such view of Feng-Shui on capital of nations.
However, in 1934 (King Taejo yr3), when the transfer was made, the influence of Feng-Shui has fallen, and the justifications were altered to economic rationality such as convenience of tax transportation, etc.
In King Taejo period, palaces, shrines, and altars of earth and grain were constructed in Hanyang under the capital establishment theory of 『Joorye 周禮』.
The width of roads were sufficient to allow 9 wagons to pass at once, suitable as the capital of the emperor. Also, the ritual altar of the king, Wongu-Dan, was built. The model of Hanyang construction was Kaekyung, the imperial metropolis of Koryo.
King Jeongjong has moved the capital from Hanyang to Kaekyung, and after the second Disturbance of the Princes, King Tae-Jong has ruled the nation under a duplex capital system, designating two capitals of Kaekyung and Hanyang. The king and the bureaucracy resided in Kaekyung, but the symbolic facilities of the nation, such as the shrine and altars were located in Hanyang,
In 1405 (King Taejong yr5) Taejong has decided return to Hanyang. The most influential factor in decision was not Feng-Shui, but the economic rationality based on Confucian ideology. King Taejong, upon transfer of the capital, has additionally constructed the city facilities King Taejo could not complete, such as Changdeok Palace, Servant Quarters.
The facilities constructed in this period have followed the standard of feudal lord, not that of an emperor. Still, King Taejong has not modified Hanyang, which was established in King Taejo period. Taejong’ s Hanyang was in a transitional period, where an empirical capital taking its looks after Kaekyung was being transferred to the city of a feudal lord.
In King Sejong period, the Confucian theory was solidified as the national ideology, and accordingly the phase of Hanyang was readjusted following the Confucian reputation. The road widths were adjusted to comply with lords’ standard, and the rituals to heaven were abolished.
The Improvement of Hanyang in King Sejong period was a transition process. from a national capital to a city of the feudal lord in the Chinese system.
The residents of Hanyang were exempted from land tax, drafted labor, and military service. Only housing tax and labor tax were imposed. The fact of Hanyang residents holding these advantages over rural residents shows that the theory of connection, between difference in social status and difference in spatial difference, was being realized by the governing method of Hanyang.
The debate on transfer of the capital to Namkyung, in late Koryo period, has its grounds on Feng-Shui theory, which asserted that the force of Kaekyung has diminished.
The transfer of capital to Hanyang, which was decided immediately after King Taejo has succeeded the throne, was influenced by such view of Feng-Shui on capital of nations.
However, in 1934 (King Taejo yr3), when the transfer was made, the influence of Feng-Shui has fallen, and the justifications were altered to economic rationality such as convenience of tax transportation, etc.
In King Taejo period, palaces, shrines, and altars of earth and grain were constructed in Hanyang under the capital establishment theory of 『Joorye 周禮』.
The width of roads were sufficient to allow 9 wagons to pass at once, suitable as the capital of the emperor. Also, the ritual altar of the king, Wongu-Dan, was built. The model of Hanyang construction was Kaekyung, the imperial metropolis of Koryo.
King Jeongjong has moved the capital from Hanyang to Kaekyung, and after the second Disturbance of the Princes, King Tae-Jong has ruled the nation under a duplex capital system, designating two capitals of Kaekyung and Hanyang. The king and the bureaucracy resided in Kaekyung, but the symbolic facilities of the nation, such as the shrine and altars were located in Hanyang,
In 1405 (King Taejong yr5) Taejong has decided return to Hanyang. The most influential factor in decision was not Feng-Shui, but the economic rationality based on Confucian ideology. King Taejong, upon transfer of the capital, has additionally constructed the city facilities King Taejo could not complete, such as Changdeok Palace, Servant Quarters.
The facilities constructed in this period have followed the standard of feudal lord, not that of an emperor. Still, King Taejong has not modified Hanyang, which was established in King Taejo period. Taejong’ s Hanyang was in a transitional period, where an empirical capital taking its looks after Kaekyung was being transferred to the city of a feudal lord.
In King Sejong period, the Confucian theory was solidified as the national ideology, and accordingly the phase of Hanyang was readjusted following the Confucian reputation. The road widths were adjusted to comply with lords’ standard, and the rituals to heaven were abolished.
The Improvement of Hanyang in King Sejong period was a transition process. from a national capital to a city of the feudal lord in the Chinese system.
The residents of Hanyang were exempted from land tax, drafted labor, and military service. Only housing tax and labor tax were imposed. The fact of Hanyang residents holding these advantages over rural residents shows that the theory of connection, between difference in social status and difference in spatial difference, was being realized by the governing method of Hanyang.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 漢陽의 형성과정과 사상적 배경
3. 漢陽의 都市構造
4. 漢陽 住民의 성격
5. 맺음말
(Abstract)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선시대 한양의 수도성 : 도시의 위계와 공간표현을 중심으로
역사학보
2011 .03
-
열전의 종막과 냉전의 서막 : 휴전회담에 대한 최초의 역사학적 접근 : 김보영, 『전쟁과 휴전 : 휴전회담 기록으로 읽는 한국전쟁』(한양대 출판부, 2016)
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
『한양』 게재 광주 항쟁 시의 언술 주체와 담론 특성
한국민족문화
2018 .08
-
고려 공양왕대의 천도론
역사와 담론
2010 .12
-
조선 초엽 漢陽定都과정과 수도 방위
한국사연구
2004 .12
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
한국 도시사 연구동향 : 고려 개경과 조선 한양을 중심으로
역사학보
2010 .09
-
정조대 수원 화성 신도시의 위상과 別京 구상
역사교육
2019 .09
-
한양도성(漢陽都城) 출토 원대(元代) 청화백자(靑畵白瓷)의특징과 의의
강좌 미술사
2018 .01
-
古代 遷都의 역사적 의미
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
〈漢陽〉에 드러난 재일(在日)지식인들의 문제의식 고찰
어문론집
2007 .03
-
『漢陽』所載 在日韓人文學의 연구 방향과 과제
한국민족문화
2005 .04
-
발해의 천도와 그 배경
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
조선 세종대 여진인 통교체제의 정비
한국사연구
2013 .12
-
연산군~명종대 여진인 來朝의 재검토
역사학보
2014 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
조선시대 한양의 수도성 : 도시의 위계와 공간표현을 중심으로
고동환
역사학보
2011
.03
조선 초기 遷都와 移御의 정치사 : 수도 한양의 위상 강화 과정을 중심으로
김윤주
서울학연구
2011
.11
공동연구 : 16세기 조선사회의 역사적 위치 16세기 양반지주층의 경제활동
김건태
역사와현실
1995
.06
한국사에서의 수도 집중
이헌창
한국사연구
2006
.09
18~19세기 세시풍속서(歲時風俗書)에 담긴 한 양인의 세시풍속과 그 성격 : 『경도잡지(京都雜誌)』·『열양세시기(洌陽世時記)』를 중심으로
이현진
서울학연구
2018
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0