지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.4
- 수록면
- 210 - 213 (4page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Introduction
In Korean academic circles, there has been a strong tendency to view the Korean government's foreign outlook in the lead-up to the Russo-Japanese War as entirely pro-Russian. This is because research on the war has by and large been approached in the same context as Japan's encroachment on Korea. It has been seen as part of Japan's policy of continental expansion, with an emphasis placed on Korea's resistance. At the same time, there has been a lot of notable research on the neutrality policy that was the Korean government's basic diplomatic stance in the lead-up to the war. Work to date, however, has concentrated mainly on analyzing the content and character of this policy, and none have employed a multi-layered analysis that relates Russia and Japan's respective policies to their power relations within Korea. In other words, the neutrality policy has been viewed in isolation. This was probably the result of looking at the war entirely as a conflict between Russia and Japan without taking the existence of Korea in between into account. Furthermore, to some extent the pro-Russian policy and neutrality policy could not co-exist. Judging how compatible they really were also needs examination.
Conclusion
Korea's neutrality policy was formed after the strategy of dependence on Russia broke down, accompanied by the construction of the containment mechanism between Russia and Japan. In practice, however, it proved extremely difficult to realize due to Japan's argument for a Manchuria-Korea bloc. And yet, the Korean government adhered to this neutrality policy right up until the Russo-Japanese War, a stance closely linked to its inability fully to understand the nature of the conflict. In other words, it believed that the causes of the confrontation between Russia and Japan lay in the Manchurian issue, not the Korean question. By extension, it never lost hope that a Korean neutrality policy might be achieved if only the Manchuria issue was resolved. This shows how the Russo-Japanese War appeared in the eyes of the ruling class in Korea.
Essentially, Korea's neutrality policy was based on the premise of breaking its links with Russia. In the process that led to the Russo-Japanese War, however, the Korean government continued to pursue a diplomatic strategy that effectively leaned towards Russia. Two overlapping points can be raised to justify such an interpretation. Firstly, both Russia and Korea repeatedly proposed neutrality policies; and secondly, Go Jong took an anti-Japanese and pro-Russian stance during the war.
In Korean academic circles, there has been a strong tendency to view the Korean government's foreign outlook in the lead-up to the Russo-Japanese War as entirely pro-Russian. This is because research on the war has by and large been approached in the same context as Japan's encroachment on Korea. It has been seen as part of Japan's policy of continental expansion, with an emphasis placed on Korea's resistance. At the same time, there has been a lot of notable research on the neutrality policy that was the Korean government's basic diplomatic stance in the lead-up to the war. Work to date, however, has concentrated mainly on analyzing the content and character of this policy, and none have employed a multi-layered analysis that relates Russia and Japan's respective policies to their power relations within Korea. In other words, the neutrality policy has been viewed in isolation. This was probably the result of looking at the war entirely as a conflict between Russia and Japan without taking the existence of Korea in between into account. Furthermore, to some extent the pro-Russian policy and neutrality policy could not co-exist. Judging how compatible they really were also needs examination.
Conclusion
Korea's neutrality policy was formed after the strategy of dependence on Russia broke down, accompanied by the construction of the containment mechanism between Russia and Japan. In practice, however, it proved extremely difficult to realize due to Japan's argument for a Manchuria-Korea bloc. And yet, the Korean government adhered to this neutrality policy right up until the Russo-Japanese War, a stance closely linked to its inability fully to understand the nature of the conflict. In other words, it believed that the causes of the confrontation between Russia and Japan lay in the Manchurian issue, not the Korean question. By extension, it never lost hope that a Korean neutrality policy might be achieved if only the Manchuria issue was resolved. This shows how the Russo-Japanese War appeared in the eyes of the ruling class in Korea.
Essentially, Korea's neutrality policy was based on the premise of breaking its links with Russia. In the process that led to the Russo-Japanese War, however, the Korean government continued to pursue a diplomatic strategy that effectively leaned towards Russia. Two overlapping points can be raised to justify such an interpretation. Firstly, both Russia and Korea repeatedly proposed neutrality policies; and secondly, Go Jong took an anti-Japanese and pro-Russian stance during the war.
목차
1. はじめに
2. 韓露?係の再?討
3. 日露の牽制メカニズムと韓?の自律性
4. ?韓問題と韓?の中立化
5. 終わりに
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
러일전쟁과 러일협상(1905-1910) : 러일전쟁 이후 러시아의 동아시아정책을 중심으로
아시아문화
2004 .08
-
일본의 러일전쟁에 대한 인식
아시아문화
2004 .08
-
Russo-Japanese War: Social Factors and Implications of the Russo-Japanese People
세계지역연구논총
2019 .01
-
Russo-Japanese War: Social Factors and Implications of the Russo-Japanese People
세계지역연구논총
2019 .01
-
Recent Development of Russia – Japan Economic Relations and Implications for Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2018 .01
-
Overview of the Policy on Network Neutrality in Japan : In Comparison with the Policy Development in the U.S.
경제규제와 법
2012 .05
-
영일동맹과 러일전쟁 : 영국의 일본 지원에 관한 연구
국제정치연구
2012 .12
-
트럼프 정부 출범 이후 미-러 관계와 한국의 대러정책 지향
국방연구
2018 .01
-
러일전쟁 전후 한국인의 러시아 이미지 형성 경로와 러시아 인식
마르크스주의 연구
2010 .08
-
Russian Policy towards the Korean Unification
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2015 .01
-
한ㆍ소 수교 이후 북ㆍ러 관계 : 회고와 전망
아시아문화
2001 .08
-
Russian Influence on North Korea: Views of Former South Korean Ambassadors to Russia
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2012 .01
-
Russia’s Economic Modernization Policy and Implications for Cooperation between Korea and Russia
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2016 .01
-
모바일 플랫폼 중립성의 개념 정립
법과기업연구
2011 .07
-
검색 중립성과 경쟁법 집행원리
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
망중립성에 관한 이용자 인식 연구 : Q 방법론의 적용
정보사회와 미디어
2018 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
A Study on China’s Energy Policy : Focusing on Sustainable Development and Environment Protection
Liekai Bi
,
Hae Jo Chung
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2015
.11
미국 로스쿨 LL.M 교육과정과 시사점 : IIT Chicago - kent College of Law를 중심으로
임석원
,
허균
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2015
.11
영미권에서 출판된 일본역사서 속의 한국사 및 한일관계사 관련 서술에 관한 조사 연구 : 왜구 문제를 중심으로
이영
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2015
.11
관동대지진 직후 재일조선인정책 : 식민지조선 언론을 중심으로
성주현
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2015
.11
일제강점기 카다 나오지(賀田直治)의 조선인식과 ‘日滿支維新’
김명수
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2015
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0