메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국세계지역학회 세계지역연구논총 세계지역연구논총 제37권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
253 - 268 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The main purpose of this article is to analyze how the war was recognized and socially accepted from the viewpoint of humanism and social factors, unlike the perspective of the political military perspectives. The Russia and Japan focused on major literary works of the their countries on different perspectives and positions after the outcome of the Russo-Japanese war (1904-1905) caused by Russia’s Dongjin policy on the Korean peninsula and Japan’s expansion of imperialism. They also analyzed how social and cultural factors, which were the basis of people’s consciousness and actions deployed in the site of conflict at the time, were affected by the policy-making process. During this period, anti-government activities were activated based on Russian people and intellectuals’ opposition to tyranny. The Bolshevik government and Stalin government maintained critical views of the Russo-Japanese War, but they were convinced that the Soviet Union had waited for the end of World War II and that they had defeated Japan in the statement. Stalin’s statement represents the long-standing hostility toward Japan among Russians who suffered severe damage to their self-esteem after the Russo-Japanese War.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0