지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the foundation of the Republic of Korea, the oral statements from people who actually lived and experienced the process of foundation will be examined in this article, and of course the historical meaning will be assessed as well.
For the past few years, a reactionary trend against the existing historical studies of the Korean contemporary period has been formed. This trend could be labelled as a 'reinterpretation of the Korean contemporary history', and it is particularly emphasizing the role of the elites during the process which started from liberation and then led to the government's foundation, and also to the Korean war.
In the meantime, historical studies using oral statements have begun to be noticed as well. Such studies complimented and also enhanced the existing studies with their new methods, and they ended up presenting a fundamentally critical analysis of the aforementioned trend of 'reinterpretation'. During the three years period under U.S. military government and also the First Republic period, the people of the Republic of Korea were protected neither by the founding ideology of the nation nor the nation's own constitution. On the other hand, they were busy protecting themselves from governmental bodies such as the police, the youth alliance and the military, as we can hear from the oral statements they made. Individual's freedom of speech and the principle of fair competition, which are usually regarded as the essence of free democracy and market-based economy, were being considerably threatened during the process of the nation's foundation. Especially the very process of determining the constitutional system for the Republic of Korea, in other words the May 10th election, was a party for the elites alone, as the free voices of the community members or debates discussing major agendas were no where to be found. Oral statements from the people who lived that time period truly reveals how such 'party for elites' was an empty one, and how much the Republic of Korea owes to the sacrifice and efforts of its own people, who were excluded from the foundation process itself.
For the past few years, a reactionary trend against the existing historical studies of the Korean contemporary period has been formed. This trend could be labelled as a 'reinterpretation of the Korean contemporary history', and it is particularly emphasizing the role of the elites during the process which started from liberation and then led to the government's foundation, and also to the Korean war.
In the meantime, historical studies using oral statements have begun to be noticed as well. Such studies complimented and also enhanced the existing studies with their new methods, and they ended up presenting a fundamentally critical analysis of the aforementioned trend of 'reinterpretation'. During the three years period under U.S. military government and also the First Republic period, the people of the Republic of Korea were protected neither by the founding ideology of the nation nor the nation's own constitution. On the other hand, they were busy protecting themselves from governmental bodies such as the police, the youth alliance and the military, as we can hear from the oral statements they made. Individual's freedom of speech and the principle of fair competition, which are usually regarded as the essence of free democracy and market-based economy, were being considerably threatened during the process of the nation's foundation. Especially the very process of determining the constitutional system for the Republic of Korea, in other words the May 10th election, was a party for the elites alone, as the free voices of the community members or debates discussing major agendas were no where to be found. Oral statements from the people who lived that time period truly reveals how such 'party for elites' was an empty one, and how much the Republic of Korea owes to the sacrifice and efforts of its own people, who were excluded from the foundation process itself.
목차
들어가며
1. 현대사의 재해석
2. 법과 주먹
3. 배신과 헌신
마치며
주
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
역사학, 구술사를 만나다 : 역사학자의 관점에서 본 구술사의 현황과 과제
역사와현실
2009 .03
-
한센인의 생애구술과 치유
의사학
2013 .08
-
역대 대한민국 헌법의 민주주의와 자유민주적 기본질서
역사와현실
2011 .12
-
남북한의 민족주의 역사학
韓國史學史學報
2004 .01
-
대한민국 제헌헌법과 ‘건국절’ 논란 : 헌법 전문과 중앙정부론을 중심으로
한국사학보
2016 .11
-
통일 시대를 위한 구비문학 연구의 성찰과 모색
어문학
2015 .03
-
'수복지구' 주민의 정체성 형성과정 : '인민'에서 '주민'으로 '주민'에서 '국민'으로
역사비평
2010 .05
-
The Traditional Elite
Korea Journal
1977 .05
-
階級과 共和 : 중국공산당의 ‘共和國’ 구상의 변천
중국근현대사연구
2011 .12
-
건국절 제정론과 비(非) · 몰(沒) · 반(反)역사성 - 1948년 8월 직후 대한민국의 자유민주주의성을 중심으로
역사비평
2019 .08
-
The Role of Female and Male Christians in the Democratic People`s Republic of Korea : Some Cases
한국기독교신학논총
1997 .10
-
민주주의의 눈으로 본 역사학
역사교육
2013 .06
-
New Perspectives on Student Elites and Power
Korea Journal
1971 .06
-
한국의 근대국가 건설운동과 공화제
역사학보
2008 .12
-
EXPERIENCE OF ORAL AND HISTORICAL RESEARCH IN UZBEKISTAN
외국학연구
2014 .01
-
근대 중국의 민족제국주의와 단일민족론
동북아역사논총
2009 .03
-
중국 지식엘리트의 충원문화와 메커니즘
아시아문화연구
2011 .03
-
역사교과서 속의 민주주의 : 한중일 3국 비교
역사교육
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
제1공화국의 지배 이데올로기 : 반공주의와 그 변용들
후지이 다케시
역사비평
2008
.05
‘기억’의 사회화를 위해, 「과거사 청산, ‘민주화’를 넘어 ‘사회화’로」 - 김영수, 메이데이, 2007
이기훈
역사비평
2008
.05
어떤 상상의 공동체? 민족, 국민 그리고 그 너머
진태원
역사비평
2011
.08
일본에서 꽃핀 조선의 도자기 문화 : 임진왜란 당시 납치된 조선인 도공 이야기
구태훈
역사비평
2008
.11
‘난동’, ‘정벌’, ‘원조’를 넘어 : ‘임진왜란’을 부르는 동아시아 공통의 용어를 위하여
한명기
역사비평
2008
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-905-015076610