지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years, historians have become increasingly concerned over the relationship between the Nazi regime and the contemporary conservation movement in Germany. They have found that it is quite difficult to generalize on the environmental history of the Nazi era. There were not just similarities but also signifiant divergences between the Nazism and the conservationism in their conceptions of nature and their political styles. The two ideologies are overlapped in their cult of nature, anti-capitalism and longing for national regeneration. However the regionalism of the conservation movement was in itself hardly reconcilable with the Fuhrer Principles, male chauvinism and militarism of the Nazism.
The passage of the Reich Nature Protection Law in 1935 became the crucial turning point in terms that it was the most comprehensive and progressive environmental legislation of the day. The law was enthusiastically welcomed by conservationists who had disappointed with the meager accomplishments of the Weimar period. It enhanced a general boom of administrative conservation work that some conservationists called the period a "high time" for conservation. But the environmental discourses of the so-called "green wing" of the Nazis represented racist and antisemitic elements to a considerable extent. Moreover, the causes of conservation were immediately subordinated to aims of the war effort. In this context, it can be compared to a "Faustian bargain" that conservationists entered in their rapprochement to the regime during the Third Reich.
The passage of the Reich Nature Protection Law in 1935 became the crucial turning point in terms that it was the most comprehensive and progressive environmental legislation of the day. The law was enthusiastically welcomed by conservationists who had disappointed with the meager accomplishments of the Weimar period. It enhanced a general boom of administrative conservation work that some conservationists called the period a "high time" for conservation. But the environmental discourses of the so-called "green wing" of the Nazis represented racist and antisemitic elements to a considerable extent. Moreover, the causes of conservation were immediately subordinated to aims of the war effort. In this context, it can be compared to a "Faustian bargain" that conservationists entered in their rapprochement to the regime during the Third Reich.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 자연을 통한 ‘민족 만들기’
Ⅲ. 나치즘과 독일 환경운동의 관계
Ⅳ. “독일 자연보호운동의 전성기”? 제국자연보호법과 나치 환경정책의 실제
Ⅴ. 나치 환경담론의 인종주의적 성격
Ⅵ. 나오는 말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국가와 환경-프로이센 국립천연기념물보호국과 독일 환경정책의 탄생-
서양사론
2019 .01
-
Energy Conservation in Korea
Korea Journal
1982 .03
-
The Law of Conservation and Linguistic Explanation
어학연구
1992 .06
-
존 스튜어트 밀의 환경론
영국 연구
2012 .01
-
나치당(NSDAP)의 선거포스터와 선전정책, 1919~1932
역사와경계
2004 .09
-
“이용하되 낭비는 말라” : 환경생태사상 개척자로서의 쿠퍼의 『개척자들』
문학과환경
2008 .06
-
냉전기 동독의 대 서독 선전공세 - 나치 과거청산 문제를 중심으로 -
역사와경계
2005 .03
-
바이마르 공화국의 司法의 성격에 관한 小考
역사교육
2003 .09
-
Man and Nature
인간연구
2017 .01
-
심종문 湘西 문학세계가 지닌 생태여성주의의 가능성
중국문화연구
2016 .11
-
문제극의 관점에서 본 에드워드 본드의 Summer 고찰
현대영미드라마
2009 .04
-
나치 민족공동체 안에서의 꿈
대구사학
2007 .01
-
나치스문학과 친일전쟁시(親日戰爭詩)의 논리
동악어문학
2015 .08
-
환경보호와 지역의 재발견
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1995 .08
-
복지인가? 프로파간다인가? 나치 포스터에 나타나는 민족공동체 이미지 분석 : 나치 복지포스터를 중심으로
역사와경계
2006 .06
-
[Story] Good Bargain
Korea Journal
1973 .06
-
나치즘과 근대화 - 경제 부문을 중심으로 -
역사와경계
1999 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014996082