메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.5 Number.2
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
305 - 325 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Modern English (ModE), the 1<SUP>st</SUP> and 2<SUP>nd</SUP> person reflexives are composed of a possessive adjective + self (e.g., my+self, your+self, etc.), whereas the 3<SUP>rd</SUP> person reflexives consist of an objective pronoun + self (e.g., him+self, them+selves, etc.). This paper addresses this morphological asymmetry and explains when, why, and how the asymmetry occurred during the history of the English language. I suggest that this morphological asymmetry in ModE was caused by a polarization in Old English (OE) reflexivization between the 1<SUP>st</SUP> and 2<SUP>nd</SUP> persons, on the one hand, and the 3<SUP>rd</SUP> person, on the other. The polarization seems to have happened as follows: by the beginning of the Middle English (ME) period, DE [genitive pronoun + self] had been reanalyzed as [possessive adjective + self] for the 1<SUP>st</SUP> and 2<SUP>nd</SUP> persons, because the 1<SUP>st</SUP> and 2<SUP>nd</SUP> persons had identical stems for both genitive pronouns and possessive adjectives in OE (e.g., min, ure, pin, and eower). The 3<SUP>rd</SUP> person, on the other hand, had no comparable usage in that the OE 3<SUP>rd</SUP> person genitive pronouns were simply genitive pronouns and were not yet used as possessive adjectives. In addition, there were 3'd person reflexive possessive adjectives (i.e., sin, sines, sinum, etc.).

목차

1. Introduction
2. A Brief History of self
3. Why did the asymmetry occur in the ModE reflexive pronominal system?
4. Summary and conclusion
References

참고문헌 (4)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-740-014916812