지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Russian causative constructions can be divided into seven subtypes according to their morpholexical, syntactic and semantic characteristics. There is one phenomenon that appears to be common to all causative constructions: The indirect agent is realized as the syntactic subject. However. the direct agent is realized as an object in most cases or cannot be realized in contextual causative constructions.
The syntactic and lexical characteristics are analyzed in the theoretical background which is based on works of Hale & Keyser. Hoffman. This includes a syntactic theory of argument structure in which the argument structure of a predicate takes the form of syntactic trees. and head-to-head movement may take place at a level of representation known as lexical syntax (1-syntax). The basic lexical syntactic structure is as follows:
＜이미지 참조＞
Here V¹ is the causative verb or affix(causative morpheme or causative prefix), while V² is the basic verb. XP being its complement (possibly null). When V¹ is a bound morpheme, V² raises to V¹ and the synthetic causatives(No. 4 & 5 types) result. When V¹ is 0-form causative verb. the synthetic causatives (No. 2 & 3 types) and the contextual causatives(No. 6 & 7) result. In contrast with this structure. the analytic causatives (No. 1 type) have a full causative verb which takes an IP complement in s-syntax,
The syntactic and lexical characteristics are analyzed in the theoretical background which is based on works of Hale & Keyser. Hoffman. This includes a syntactic theory of argument structure in which the argument structure of a predicate takes the form of syntactic trees. and head-to-head movement may take place at a level of representation known as lexical syntax (1-syntax). The basic lexical syntactic structure is as follows:
＜이미지 참조＞
Here V¹ is the causative verb or affix(causative morpheme or causative prefix), while V² is the basic verb. XP being its complement (possibly null). When V¹ is a bound morpheme, V² raises to V¹ and the synthetic causatives(No. 4 & 5 types) result. When V¹ is 0-form causative verb. the synthetic causatives (No. 2 & 3 types) and the contextual causatives(No. 6 & 7) result. In contrast with this structure. the analytic causatives (No. 1 type) have a full causative verb which takes an IP complement in s-syntax,
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 러시아어의 사역구문
Ⅲ. 사역구문의 의미적 특성
Ⅳ. 동사의 논항구조
Ⅴ. 러시아어 사역구문의 구조 분석
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
ON THE DETERMINATION ON A CAUSATIVE VERB AND A CAUSATIVE CONSTRUCTION
어학연구
1985 .06
-
한국어 사동 유형으로서의 ‘(-)시키-’ 사동
한민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
AS使役に関する一考察
일본문화학보
2001 .08
-
한국어 사동문의 통사론적 도출
언어
2012 .09
-
Two Causative Forms in Korean
어학연구
1974 .06
-
On the Causee Argument in Japanese and Korean Analytic Causative Construction
생성문법연구
2006 .01
-
현대중국어 사동의 형태적 생산성 분석: V1V2 형식의 사동구조를 중심으로
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
Lexical Causatives in Korean
어학연구
1975 .06
-
한국어 사동문의 의미 해석과 통사구조
한국어학
2013 .05
-
사역 운동동사 구문의 환언과 제 문제
언어과학
2011 .01
-
영어 사역 구문에서의 번역 오류와 지도 방안
통번역교육연구
2016 .01
-
使役文の統語構造と敎え方 : 韓國語との對照硏究の立場から
일어일문학
2014 .02
-
한국어의 ‘시키다’ 사동 구문
어문학
2016 .12
-
On the Syntax and Semantics of the English Causative Make
영어학
2008 .12
-
Causative Morphemes as Pragmatic Intensifiers
담화와인지
2010 .04
-
≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 구문론적 해석
중국어문논총
2017 .01
-
Doubling Phenomena of Causative and Passive Constructions
언어학 연구
2018 .04
-
당구공 모형으로 보는 한국어 사동 표현의 동기화
담화와인지
2015 .04
-
English Have Causatives and the Selectional Variation between Have and Make
영어학연구
2014 .01
-
An Iconicity-based Approach to Spanish Causative Constructions
스페인어문학
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-892-014881680