지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We have already seen lots of studies revealing that "the Western Region people" had come to Korean peninsula in the period of Unified Shilla (統一新羅). Some studies proposed the possibility that the Unified Shilla played an active role in drawing many alien goods from Western Region by direct communicating with them. As a result, we often make a picture of the Unified Shilla, that is, a lot of Western Region people had stalked along the street with the Shilla people. So they concluded that whole statues similar to the Western Region people could have been made after the people whom the Shilla people had really seen.
I don't want to repeat this controversial debate whether they had come to this place or not. However, I put my stress on the fact that seeing them and making into a certain image are totally different things. Moreover, there had been ready-made images about these Western Region people in China, where the Tang (唐) people had seen crowds of them for more years than the Unified Shilla people. Then, is it probable that the Unified Shilla people neglect this image which many monks and merchant brought to them, and made their own special linage?
At first, it was in China that “Western Region people image" was made as an icon. Their characteristics are obvious and conceptualized. They have big eyes and noses with full of beards, and their facial expressions and whole body motions remind us of brave
warriors. They sometimes wear their own clothes, but more often wear Tang-style clothes or armours. Actually, the “Western Region people" statues of the Unified Shilla are so similar to the Tang-style ”Western Region people image" that we could hardly say it would have made by seeing them directly in Shilla.
A warrior statue is standing left and right at the entrance guarding a royal Unifed Shilla tomb. This seems to be Tang-style "Western Region image". The reason why this "Western Region warrior" guards this royal tomb is not because he came from Western Region. but because Vajrapa i was needed to guard the sacred place. And this Vajrapa i's image had been fixed into a Western Region people's image in Tang period. Therefore, the Unified Shilla people should have copied the ready-made Vajrapa i according to the trend, in result it is natural that it took Tang-style.
Communication with other people does not necessarily make a new image. The Unified Shilla people who already knows about Tang-style "Western Region people image" would have not neglected this fixed image without any special reason. As we do not say Vajrapani was made after the real Western Region people. we should be careful to say a warrior statue in the Wonsung(元聖王) royal tomb was made after the real Western Region people.
I don't want to repeat this controversial debate whether they had come to this place or not. However, I put my stress on the fact that seeing them and making into a certain image are totally different things. Moreover, there had been ready-made images about these Western Region people in China, where the Tang (唐) people had seen crowds of them for more years than the Unified Shilla people. Then, is it probable that the Unified Shilla people neglect this image which many monks and merchant brought to them, and made their own special linage?
At first, it was in China that “Western Region people image" was made as an icon. Their characteristics are obvious and conceptualized. They have big eyes and noses with full of beards, and their facial expressions and whole body motions remind us of brave
warriors. They sometimes wear their own clothes, but more often wear Tang-style clothes or armours. Actually, the “Western Region people" statues of the Unified Shilla are so similar to the Tang-style ”Western Region people image" that we could hardly say it would have made by seeing them directly in Shilla.
A warrior statue is standing left and right at the entrance guarding a royal Unifed Shilla tomb. This seems to be Tang-style "Western Region image". The reason why this "Western Region warrior" guards this royal tomb is not because he came from Western Region. but because Vajrapa i was needed to guard the sacred place. And this Vajrapa i's image had been fixed into a Western Region people's image in Tang period. Therefore, the Unified Shilla people should have copied the ready-made Vajrapa i according to the trend, in result it is natural that it took Tang-style.
Communication with other people does not necessarily make a new image. The Unified Shilla people who already knows about Tang-style "Western Region people image" would have not neglected this fixed image without any special reason. As we do not say Vajrapani was made after the real Western Region people. we should be careful to say a warrior statue in the Wonsung(元聖王) royal tomb was made after the real Western Region people.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 唐代 미술에 나타난 ‘서역인‘
Ⅲ. 통일신라시대의 ‘서역인‘ 접촉 및 도래 가능성
Ⅳ. ‘서역인‘인가 ‘서역인 이미지‘인가
Ⅴ. 맺음말: 한국 고대미술 속의 서역인식
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
여성해방운동이 서양복식에 미친 영향에 관한 연구($1850\~1950$)
한국의류학회지
1991 .01
-
中國 喪葬美術의 東西交流 : 北朝시기 西域民族의 石葬具를 중심으로
미술사논단
2007 .06
-
THE INFLUENCES OF AMERICAN WESTERN STYLE IN THE MODERN FASHION
한국의류학회 학술발표논문집
2005 .01
-
조선 후기 한궁도 연구
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2018 .09
-
1980년대 이후 패션일러스트레이션의 시각적이미지 표현방법 분석(제2보)
한국의류학회지
2002 .01
-
커트 테크닉을 이용한 헤어디자인 조절기법
대한미용학회지
2009 .01
-
Image of Korea
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2019 .06
-
Image of Korea
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2014 .05
-
60년대 이후 패션 트렌드를 중심으로 본 패션 모델이미지
한국패션뷰티학회지
2004 .01
-
포스트콜로니얼리즘!? : 지금 이곳에서 서양미술사 하기와 관련하여
서양미술사학회논문집
1999 .06
-
조선 전기 왕릉제도의 성립과 石人ㆍ石獸 양식 연구
미술사논단
2009 .12
-
關中地域 唐代 皇室壁畵墓의 도상연구
미술사논단
2006 .12
-
20-30대 미혼여성의 자아이미지가 남성이미지 선호도에 미치는 영향
대한미용학회지
2018 .01
-
신라토우를 통해서 보는 신라인의 미감에 관한 연구 : 고대신라의 토우형태에 나타난 조형미를 중심으로
한국디자인문화학회지
2012 .03
-
2018 동계올림픽 유치에 따른 국가이미지가 국가 브랜드이미지 및 소비태도에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2012 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-014719013