지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper has two purposes. One is to introduce the main issues of the postcolonial theory or postcolonialism which emerges as an important theme among the western academy and the third world scholars. The other is to investigate the possibility of change which it could bring about in the perspectives of our Korean scholars on the western art history and to search the concrete meanings and suggestions it could reserve for the study on that one.
As the history shows, Korea has experienced the colonial life during thirty six years by neighboring Japan, not by the western empire. Moreover after we accomplished the political independence from Japan, we underwent the Korean war, which has resulted in the division of the nation, the North Korea and the South Korea. After these historical change, the South has come to be subjugated to America in culture as well as in politics and economy. All these continuous colonial and post-colonial experiences made the culture of the South in the predicament.
Considering these historical contexts and the situation, to study the western art history here and now needs the deep self-conscious and self-reliant subjective position. In so far as the western art history is the “western” art history which regards us as “the other”, and is the means of realization of the colonial knowledge-power(as if English literature had been so all over the world), this self-conscious and self-reliant subjective position is seriously needed.
What is firstly required for recovering this kind of self- reliant position is to escape from the stage of the unconscious identification with the westernized theories and methods, which can be called as “the imaginary order” in Lacanian terms. It means to keep the distance from the object such as Brecht’s concept on ‘the distancing effect’. By doing so, the identification which is the colonial effect can be removed, and the western art history can be placed (as) the “western“ art history, or positioned properly as the “other” art history which exists as something distinct from our own.
Secondly, to arrange the western art history according to our self- reliant subjective problematic is another important work. It means that we should pose the western art history in its own context. It is namely to understand that the western art history has been
constituted according to their own history and experience. And It is also to realize that the Western art history has functioned as the institution and discursive complex which has constituted our Korean culture and history in a way of colonialization. Seen in this way, the western art history becomes a part of 1) our humanities 2) western studies 3) contemporary studies, and lastly a means of positive relationship between west and our history. Then, the western art history will be our culture and art history beyond a mere “western” art history.
Finally, the self-reliant subjective study on the western art history is to broaden the understanding of our own experiences and to be a part of an engagement in our life. Those understanding and engagement can be the foundation of the research which resists against all kinds of dominance and subordination. Postcolonialism should be fully utilized as an important guide and an research archive for the self- reliant subject study.
As the history shows, Korea has experienced the colonial life during thirty six years by neighboring Japan, not by the western empire. Moreover after we accomplished the political independence from Japan, we underwent the Korean war, which has resulted in the division of the nation, the North Korea and the South Korea. After these historical change, the South has come to be subjugated to America in culture as well as in politics and economy. All these continuous colonial and post-colonial experiences made the culture of the South in the predicament.
Considering these historical contexts and the situation, to study the western art history here and now needs the deep self-conscious and self-reliant subjective position. In so far as the western art history is the “western” art history which regards us as “the other”, and is the means of realization of the colonial knowledge-power(as if English literature had been so all over the world), this self-conscious and self-reliant subjective position is seriously needed.
What is firstly required for recovering this kind of self- reliant position is to escape from the stage of the unconscious identification with the westernized theories and methods, which can be called as “the imaginary order” in Lacanian terms. It means to keep the distance from the object such as Brecht’s concept on ‘the distancing effect’. By doing so, the identification which is the colonial effect can be removed, and the western art history can be placed (as) the “western“ art history, or positioned properly as the “other” art history which exists as something distinct from our own.
Secondly, to arrange the western art history according to our self- reliant subjective problematic is another important work. It means that we should pose the western art history in its own context. It is namely to understand that the western art history has been
constituted according to their own history and experience. And It is also to realize that the Western art history has functioned as the institution and discursive complex which has constituted our Korean culture and history in a way of colonialization. Seen in this way, the western art history becomes a part of 1) our humanities 2) western studies 3) contemporary studies, and lastly a means of positive relationship between west and our history. Then, the western art history will be our culture and art history beyond a mere “western” art history.
Finally, the self-reliant subjective study on the western art history is to broaden the understanding of our own experiences and to be a part of an engagement in our life. Those understanding and engagement can be the foundation of the research which resists against all kinds of dominance and subordination. Postcolonialism should be fully utilized as an important guide and an research archive for the self- reliant subject study.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리의 서양미술사 개론서 어떻게 가능한가
미술사학
2005 .08
-
한국현대미술사와 한국의 미술사학 교육
미술사학
2005 .08
-
미술가와 역사-미술사 교육의 한계와 전망
미술이론과 현장
2004 .01
-
스베트라나 앨퍼스에 대한 비평적 조망
현대미술사연구
2011 .12
-
The Demands of Reform and the Interpretations of Western Art History in China: 1917-1937
서양미술사학회논문집
2005 .06
-
한국 현대미술사에서 페미니즘 연구사
미술사논단
2020 .06
-
답사와 미술사 교육
미술사학
2004 .08
-
'한국회화사' 재구축의 과제 : 근대적 학문의 틀을 넘어서
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
한국의 지방 미술대학에서 실기교육에 대한 미술사 교육의 입지와 역할
미술사학
2004 .08
-
현대미술사 교재의 다양화를 위한 대안적 모색
미술사학
2005 .08
-
한국미술사연구의 과제와 방법론
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
20세기 한국미술사 연구를 위한 소고: 1960-70년대 미술을 중심으로
미술이론과 현장
2013 .01
-
미술사 교육의 전통과 담론들 : 미술관, 미술사, 그리고 교육
미술사학
2004 .08
-
전통과 현대의 다리를 놓다 : 석남 이경성의 미술사 인식
한국근현대미술사학
2011 .12
-
[특집 03] 중국 ‘정치 팝 아트(政治波普藝術)’의 형성과 전개
한국근현대미술사학
2012 .06
-
서양미술사, 왜 다시 읽어야 하는가? : ‘동원된 서양미술사’의 신화(神話)와 한국현대미술사의 세 지점
미술사학
2015 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
유교적 수치심의 관점에서 본 윤동주의 시 세계
진은영
,
김경희
한국시학연구
2017
.11
이상(李箱)의 시와 초현실주의 시론이 김수영의 후기 시론에 미친 영향 : 「참여시의 정리」(1967)를 중심으로
신형철
한국시학연구
2017
.05
올란도 외 1편
진은영
창작과비평
2014
.09
Ryan Rivadeneyra - Objects to Tell Narratives
Kim
,
Heeyoung
미술사논단
2015
.06
라이언 리바데네이라(Ryan Rivadeneyra) - 이야기를 들려주는 사물
김희영
미술사논단
2015
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-017267907