메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
신영어영문학회 신영어영문학 신영어영문학 제28집
발행연도
2004.8
수록면
117 - 132 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims at examining Henry James’s stance as an artist against the aestheticism in the late 19th century in England by explicating Gabriel Nash’s roles in The Tragic Muse(1890). Although several critics insist that Nash is a spokesman of Henry James, he proves to be an aesthete in this paper. Of course, he can be misunderstood to be James’s spokesman, because Nash’s roles as a center of the double plot and as a stimulator to Nick Dormer can mislead readers as to his genuine figure as an aesthete, and because his terms and ideas appear to be those of Matthew Arnold. But with a little more serious analysis his terms and ideas turn out to be those of aesthetes such as Walter Pater and Oscar Wild rather than those of Arnold to whom James owes quite a lot. Nash is an aesthete in that he is a dilettante enjoying art for art itself by escaping from reality. He thinks every phase of reality is nothing but a reflection of ‘dirty’ reality and therefore he escapes from reality into the world of art. James’s criticism of Nash’s aestheticism is culminated in his representation of Nick Dormer’s growth as a genuine artist. In this work Nick and Miriam Rooth are represented as genuine artists with bright visions of the salvation of society.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-016412525