지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years the U.S. Federal Estate and Gift Taxes have been come under sustained attack. Opponents have launched an all-out campaign to abolish the wealth transfer taxes, branding them as unfair, productive, and even immoral. The abolitionist cause has gained substantial support among the general public and in Congress.
On June 7, 2001, the Federal Estate Tax finally suffered an untimely death at the age of eight-five by the Economic Growth and Tax relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. The 2001 Act is a remarkable piece of legislation. It promises dramatic reductions in income and estate taxes over a nine-year phase-in period, culminating in 2010 with complete repeal of the estate tax. Interestingly, though, it retains the gift tax even after repeal of the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes.
Virtually no one expects to see the estate tax in its current form spring back into force in 2011 because of sunset provision. Instead, the 2001 Act is best viewed as an unstable truce between two contending political camps: on one hand, the root-and-branch tax-cutters who are determined to abolish the estate tax permanently, in several strokes if the goal cannot be achieved all at once; and on the other hand, skeptics who concede the need for estate tax reform but balk ay outright repeal. In the article, I consider the both camps' contentions. I also examine implication and the revenue, distributional impact of repealing the estate tax.
On June 7, 2001, the Federal Estate Tax finally suffered an untimely death at the age of eight-five by the Economic Growth and Tax relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. The 2001 Act is a remarkable piece of legislation. It promises dramatic reductions in income and estate taxes over a nine-year phase-in period, culminating in 2010 with complete repeal of the estate tax. Interestingly, though, it retains the gift tax even after repeal of the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes.
Virtually no one expects to see the estate tax in its current form spring back into force in 2011 because of sunset provision. Instead, the 2001 Act is best viewed as an unstable truce between two contending political camps: on one hand, the root-and-branch tax-cutters who are determined to abolish the estate tax permanently, in several strokes if the goal cannot be achieved all at once; and on the other hand, skeptics who concede the need for estate tax reform but balk ay outright repeal. In the article, I consider the both camps' contentions. I also examine implication and the revenue, distributional impact of repealing the estate tax.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국 상속세제의 역사적 개관
Ⅲ. 상속세 폐지에 대한 찬ㆍ반 양론
Ⅳ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
移轉稅制 개편 논의와 시사점에 대한 고찰 : 미국의 유산세 폐지와 우리 나라의 포괄주의 증여과세를 중심으로
강원법학
2009 .06
-
보유과세강화가 조세부담의 형평성에 미치는 효과
한국지방재정논집
2003 .12
-
부동산정책수단으로서의 조세
부동산학연구
2004 .01
-
부동산정책수단으로서의 조세
부동산학연구
2004 .01
-
“종합부동산세의 신설에 관한 고찰”
법학연구
2004 .12
-
부동산 거래비용이 매도자의 거래의사에 미치는 영향 - 진술선호모형의 실험적 분석결과를 중심으로 -
부동산학연구
2009 .01
-
지방세법상 토지과표의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .12
-
국세기본법과 지방세기본법의 통합과 체제 개편에 관한 연구
아태비즈니스연구
2018 .01
-
지방세 세목이전과 기초재원 확충방안
지방자치법연구
2005 .01
-
부동산보유세 부담의 국제비교연구와 그 시사점
조세학술논집
2006 .02
-
The Discrepancy between Statutory Tax and Real Tax Burden : The Case of Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2009 .04
-
중앙정부에 의한 감면이 지방 세입에 미친 효과 분석
지역정책연구
2013 .06
-
관세법상의 가산세에 관한 사례연구
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
중소기업 조세지원제도의 유효성 분석
국제회계연구
2002 .11
-
현행 종합부동산세의 내용과 그 문제점
조세법연구
2006 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-329-016993083