메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
19세기영어권문학회 19세기 영어권 문학 19세기 영어권 문학 제11권 1호
발행연도
2007.2
수록면
149 - 178 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The essay's title refers to Ruskin's work of the 1860-70s that harbors economic thought at a crucial point in its development from the eighteenth-century labor theory of value to the current primacy of demand. Essentially labor was the bulwark of his aesthetics to the end of his public life. Ruskin's identification of himself as a laborer, his borrowing of Ricardian economics in order to describe his own suffering, his abstraction of payment into the reception of his message, and his sense of writing as a commodity were therefore natural extentions of labor theory as it developed from Smith to Marx. By the 1870s, however, his self-acclaimed dual role as a moral aesthetician and a political economist made him perceive cultural shifts in the realm of art market and new readerships, as the ideal of labor receded.
In a very literal way, Marx's idea of double appropriation―that labor consumes the sensuous world and thereby the robs the worker of own means of living pervades these late texts. And some arguments of his, though not fully developed in the essays such as “The Nature of Gothic,” are very close to that proposed by the working class at this time. Ruskin, however, contradicts his own sense of society's condition, concerning the conceptions of liberty and division of labor. Again and again he has not distinguished between the world as it is, in which the composition of the society is not controlled by justice, and the world he wishes to come about, in which it is. He must assume that his world view is shared by others, lest he go mad in his isolation, yet his own sense of the world's disarray tells him it is not so. Throughout his writing in this period, then, there is the sense that the force for good is in the world, sometimes as God, but usually more nebulous; never can Ruskin locate and identify it for us. The result of this confusion in these essays, as in his earlier work, is that in practical terms he can offer no new directions.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-016520740