지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Nationalist historians perceived Kim Bu Shik as a historian who maintained quite a subservient attitude toward China. They also denounced the historical text『Samguk Sagi』, which Kim Bu Shik led the task of writing it, as a subservient version of a history regarding the ancient period of Korea. They believed that in the process of creating『Samguk Sagi』, Kim Bu Shik, based upon his Confucian beliefs, deliberately distorted the facts by deleting or inserting certain factual details. They even blamed him for not including the history of Buyeo and Balhae in『Samguk Sagi』, and creating a false, distorted version of the ancient history of Korea as a result.
Nationalist historians' criticism of Kim Bu Shik and the『Samguk Sagi』text was hardly based upon either meticulous examination of the text or rational reasoning, and therefore the arguments have shown many weaknesses. Also, studies of『Samguk Sagi』have made quite some progress recently, and it has become a general understanding that Kim Bu Shik and others maintained the position of the so-called 'only documenting, and not creating(述而不作)' during the creation of『Samguk Sagi』. The fact that the Nationalist historians' perception of『Samguk Sagi』is in need to be entirely reviewed, has been made clear to us.
Yet, it should also be noted that, Nationalist historians’ criticism of『Samguk Sagi』did provide the Korean society of historians with an invaluable opportunity to establish a new trend of historical studies based upon modern Nationalism.
Nationalist historians' criticism of Kim Bu Shik and the『Samguk Sagi』text was hardly based upon either meticulous examination of the text or rational reasoning, and therefore the arguments have shown many weaknesses. Also, studies of『Samguk Sagi』have made quite some progress recently, and it has become a general understanding that Kim Bu Shik and others maintained the position of the so-called 'only documenting, and not creating(述而不作)' during the creation of『Samguk Sagi』. The fact that the Nationalist historians' perception of『Samguk Sagi』is in need to be entirely reviewed, has been made clear to us.
Yet, it should also be noted that, Nationalist historians’ criticism of『Samguk Sagi』did provide the Korean society of historians with an invaluable opportunity to establish a new trend of historical studies based upon modern Nationalism.
목차
머리말
1. 신채호의『삼국사기』비판
2. 기타 민족주의 사학자의『삼국사기』인식
3. 민족주의 사학자의『삼국사기』인식의 한계
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Annals of Silla of the Samguk Sagi
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2013 .06
-
『三國史記』의 事實 認識과 歷史硏究者의 姿勢
역사교육
2004 .12
-
On the True Nature of “Wae” in Samguk Sagi
Korea Journal
1977 .11
-
한국고유사상과 유교(儒敎)의 습합(習合) Ⲻ 『삼국유사』와 『삼국사기』를 중심으로 Ⲻ
한국철학논집
2020 .01
-
『三國史記』地理志의 기준 시점과 연혁 오류
한국사연구
2012 .03
-
『東史年表』의 간행과 그 의미
장서각
2003 .09
-
An Introductory Study of the “Annals of Koguryŏ” in the Samguk Sagi
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2012 .06
-
Should Korean Historians Abandon Nationalism?
Korea Journal
1999 .06
-
제 일차 세계대전과 역사가들 : 독일과 미국 역사가들의 참전활동 비교
역사학보
2002 .12
-
三國史記 僞靺鞨考
사학연구
1979 .12
-
『삼국사기』와 『삼국유사』의 왕대력 비교 연구
한국사학보
2005 .11
-
탈근대 지식인으로서 역사가
역사와 담론
2008 .12
-
『三國史記』초기 기록에 나타난 倭에 대하여 : 倭의 근거지를 중심으로
한국학연구
2000 .07
-
Doing Korean History Research Outside of Korea : An Advantage of Looking from Outside?
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2012 .06
-
『삼국유사』의 편찬의도 및 전략
온지논총
2010 .01
-
Comparing and Evaluating two English versions of Samguk Yusa
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
북한 민족주의 역사학의 궤적과 환경
한국사연구
2011 .03
-
서양학계의 한국고대사 인식체계의 변화 : 동양학계와의 영향 관계를 중심으로
한국사연구
2010 .03
-
Nature and Characteristics of Nationalist Movement in Korea
Korea Journal
1966 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017609164