지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The protection of patients' right is one of the most serious issues in the course of such highly divided and specialized conducts of medical doctors as practiced today.
Since medical doctors are usually given fair grade of authority for their medical judgements, there comes on the scene the necessity to protect the right of patients from danger of being exposed to peremptory treatment of medical doctors. Moreover, the treatment of doctors may incur the intrusion into the bodies of patients, an act which requires the prior consent of patients in order to be deemed justifiable, If a patient does not know about what a doctor is going to do for treatment, the patient may not be able to agree to it. This is why the obligation of medical doctors to explain is emphasized with a view to assure the right of patient's self-determination concerning medical treatment.
The present paper reviews primarily the scope of doctor's obligation to explain, which is believed today to constitute one of doctor's responsibilities together with those of medical examination, medical record keeping, presentation of medical charts for view and observance of secrecy. This study also covers the effects of violation of such obligations.
A brief comment will follow lastly to deal with the basis for recognition, contents and effects of consent by patients for the intrusion into patients' body which is a prerequisite to make the treatment of medical doctors justifiable.
Since medical doctors are usually given fair grade of authority for their medical judgements, there comes on the scene the necessity to protect the right of patients from danger of being exposed to peremptory treatment of medical doctors. Moreover, the treatment of doctors may incur the intrusion into the bodies of patients, an act which requires the prior consent of patients in order to be deemed justifiable, If a patient does not know about what a doctor is going to do for treatment, the patient may not be able to agree to it. This is why the obligation of medical doctors to explain is emphasized with a view to assure the right of patient's self-determination concerning medical treatment.
The present paper reviews primarily the scope of doctor's obligation to explain, which is believed today to constitute one of doctor's responsibilities together with those of medical examination, medical record keeping, presentation of medical charts for view and observance of secrecy. This study also covers the effects of violation of such obligations.
A brief comment will follow lastly to deal with the basis for recognition, contents and effects of consent by patients for the intrusion into patients' body which is a prerequisite to make the treatment of medical doctors justifiable.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 醫師의 說明義務
Ⅲ. 患者의 自己決定權
Ⅳ. 說明義務違反의 效果(自己決定權 侵害의 效果)
Ⅴ. 맺음말
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한의학에서의 환자-의사 관계
동의신경정신과학회지
2007 .01
-
의사-환자간 커뮤니케이션 행위에 대한 대화분석 연구 : 의사소통 문제의 유형과 해결방안을 중심으로
한국언론학보
2000 .12
-
한.양방 협진체계 개발에 관한 연구
한국병원경영학회지
1998 .01
-
의료현장에서의 동의와 설명 －진료참관사전동의제를 중심으로－
외법논집
2012 .01
-
지불보상체계가 의사의 진료행태에 미치는 영향 : 미국사례 분석
보건행정학회지
2004 .01
-
환자의 진료협력의무와 의사의 의료과실
의료법학
2012 .01
-
의사의 구명(救命)의무와 환자의 자기결정권의관계에 관한 민법적 고찰
한양법학
2014 .08
-
건강보험에 있어서 의사와 환자간의 법률관계 - 임의비급여 문제를 중심으로 -
의료법학
2007 .01
-
지역사회 의료공급자의 지불보상체계상의 특징이 지역사회 주민의 의료이용에 미치는 영향: 미국사례분석
보건행정학회지
2005 .01
-
醫師와 患者의 法律關係에 관한 考察
원광법학
2010 .01
-
간호사고의 원인과 그 예방
의료법학
2004 .01
-
응급의료상의 의사의 전의의무
동아법학
2008 .08
-
의료행위와 환자의 자기결정권에 관한 고찰 - 대법원 2014. 6.26. 선고 2009도14407 판결을 중심으로 -
의료법학
2014 .01
-
선택진료제를 위반한 의료행위의 민사책임에 관한 고찰
의료법학
2014 .01
-
종합전문요양기관과 종합병원의 선택진료 결정요인
보건행정학회지
2011 .01
-
보건의료현장에서 환자의 권리와 의료소비자로서의 권리 비교
보건행정학회지
2017 .01
-
물리치료사의 업무범위와 의사의 지도권에 관한 법적 검토 - 청주지방법원 2010. 2. 3. 선고 2009노1317 판결 -
의료법학
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017568027