지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
All other things being equal, the electoral systems not only affect the process of converting obtained votes to parliamentary seats (mechanical effect) but also the incentive structure of voters and politicians (psychological-strategic effect). From this political effect of electoral systems, this paper infers that politicians and parties would prefer an electoral system that favorably converts support for them into parliamentary seats, and further seek for the change to such electoral system if they are allowed to do it.
For example, those who come into power without the voluntary support of voters (e.g. military coup d'etat) will pursue changes in electoral system so as to disrupt the voters' support structure toward the existing party system. In addition, change of electoral system will be sought when electoral environment comes to be disadvantageous due to decrease in voters' support to those in power, despite their efforts to stay in power. To find evidences that prove these inferences, this paper analyzes changes of the electoral systems for the Korean National Assembly.
Furthermore, this paper asserts that the fairness of the adopted system differs depending on the amending process. When the amending process is monopolized by a certain group, an unfair electoral system that benefits the group tends to be adopted. However, when several groups participate in the amending process, there tends to be a high possibility of adopting a relatively fair electoral system.
For example, those who come into power without the voluntary support of voters (e.g. military coup d'etat) will pursue changes in electoral system so as to disrupt the voters' support structure toward the existing party system. In addition, change of electoral system will be sought when electoral environment comes to be disadvantageous due to decrease in voters' support to those in power, despite their efforts to stay in power. To find evidences that prove these inferences, this paper analyzes changes of the electoral systems for the Korean National Assembly.
Furthermore, this paper asserts that the fairness of the adopted system differs depending on the amending process. When the amending process is monopolized by a certain group, an unfair electoral system that benefits the group tends to be adopted. However, when several groups participate in the amending process, there tends to be a high possibility of adopting a relatively fair electoral system.
목차
영어 초록
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORETICAL EXPLORATIONS
3. HYPOTHESIS
4. ANALYSIS: CHANGES OF THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM FOR NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
5. POLITICAL EFFECT OF THE CHANGES IN ELECTORAL SYSTEM
6. CONCLUSION
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
De la descentralización al centralismo en los procesos electorales
라틴아메리카연구
2011 .05
-
한국 국회의원 선거제도 개혁의 조건과 과제: 뉴질랜드 및 영국 사례와 비교적 관점에서
비교민주주의연구
2013 .01
-
중앙선거관리위원회 선거제도 개정안의 비판적 분석
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
The Changing Electoral Process : Modern Campaign Advertising In America
광고연구
1997 .12
-
新 선거 모델의 정착을 위한 선거 방송의 新 패러다임
사회과학연구
2001 .12
-
선거제도와 정당정치, 그리고 민주주의 : 한국과 태국의 비교 연구
한국태국학회논총
2008 .01
-
A Contextual Analysis of Electoral Choices in East Asian Emergent Democracies : The Case of the 2004 Taiwan Legislative Election
한국정치학회보
2013 .12
-
독일연방의회 선거체계의 제도적 효과 : 한국 선거체계 개혁에 주는 시사점을 중심으로
국제정치논총
2001 .11
-
선거제도의 불편한 진실 : 절차적 민주주의 강화를 위한 선거제도개혁 과제
시민과세계
2013 .01
-
민선자치 10년의 지방선거 : 평가와 전망
한국정당학회보
2005 .08
-
기업 소유집중도의 정치·제도적 결정요인 : 국가 간 비교연구
21세기정치학회보
2017 .12
-
Information Effects Conditioned by Partisanship in Electoral Participation : An American Case and Its Implication
국제정치논총
2009 .06
-
혼합선거제도, 지역경제, 그리고 지역선거정당
평화연구
2012 .10
-
선거제도 변화의 전략적 의도와 결과 : 역대 국회의원선거를 중심으로
한국정치학회보
2002 .05
-
한국의 선거주기와 대통령 소속정당의 선거이득
한국정당학회보
2008 .08
-
Preference Heterogeneity, Electoral Rules, and Party Systems : A Theoretical Simulation
평화연구
2012 .10
-
캄보디아의 선거제도와 정당체계의 상호관계
한국정치학회보
2009 .03
-
혼합식 선거제도로의 변화와 정치적 효과 : 뉴질랜드, 일본, 그리고 한국을 중심으로
시민사회와 NGO
2007 .01
-
현직자의 정책입장, 정치자금, 선거 경쟁력
한국정치학회보
2006 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-340-017370447