지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the reign of King Injo/仁祖, Park Ji Gyae, alongside Lee Gwi/李貴 and Choi Myeong Gil/崔鳴吉 who were in favor of makung peace with the Qing (‘主和’) and also of reforms in adapting principles to real life situations(‘變通’), actively requested the honoring of late Jeongweon-gun/定遠君, father of King Injo, and officially designating him as late King Weonjong/元宗, based upon the suggestion of ruling the country with filial piety(孝治論).
The discussions of ruling the country with filial piety, essentially suggested that the government should establish filial piety and due respect(孝悌), which were the basics of Confucian ethics, as ruling principles and also the ultimate aim of national ruling. The discussions also suggested that the King, above all else, should consider those values as the most basic elements that should be included in his ruling of the country. Suggestions of this nature was no different from the political discussions that had the king at the center, except this suggestion acknowledged the king’s ultimate and paramount authority(君主專制權) based upon the absolute importance of the concept of filial piety. Only strong royal authority would make policies to construct a strong and wealthy country(富國强兵) possible, and the administrative reforms vital to accomplishing such goal as well, so this suggestion wanted to achieve that by emphasizing the importance of filial piety.
Park Ji Gyae’s discussions of the concept of ruling the country with filial piety actually contained many other branches of discussions, such as the suggestion of reinforcing the Kings royal authority(王權論), the suggestion of allowing reforms to be made in adapting principles to real life situations(變通論), and the suggestion of solidifying public education throughout the country (公敎育强化論). Ultimately, his goals were to dismantle the influences of the Yangban/兩班 figures and powerful landlords(地主) who were pursuing private interests and increasing the level of decentralization(‘分權’) throughout the local regions, and reinforce the government’s official, public and centralized (集權的) power and authority, in order to overcome the national crises that were ravaging the country, with a unified front composed of both the state and the commoners. His suggestions were fresh, and were meaningful.
His suggestions and discussions ended up being integrated into the so-called Shilhak/實學 discussions. Park Ji Gyae’s discussions of ruling with filial piety could be acknowledged as a political discussion that served as the bridge between Neo-Confucian studies(朱子學) and the Shilhak, and it can also be acknowledged as a political discussion that gave birth to the Tangpyeong(蕩平論) discussions of the 18th century.
The discussions of ruling the country with filial piety, essentially suggested that the government should establish filial piety and due respect(孝悌), which were the basics of Confucian ethics, as ruling principles and also the ultimate aim of national ruling. The discussions also suggested that the King, above all else, should consider those values as the most basic elements that should be included in his ruling of the country. Suggestions of this nature was no different from the political discussions that had the king at the center, except this suggestion acknowledged the king’s ultimate and paramount authority(君主專制權) based upon the absolute importance of the concept of filial piety. Only strong royal authority would make policies to construct a strong and wealthy country(富國强兵) possible, and the administrative reforms vital to accomplishing such goal as well, so this suggestion wanted to achieve that by emphasizing the importance of filial piety.
Park Ji Gyae’s discussions of the concept of ruling the country with filial piety actually contained many other branches of discussions, such as the suggestion of reinforcing the Kings royal authority(王權論), the suggestion of allowing reforms to be made in adapting principles to real life situations(變通論), and the suggestion of solidifying public education throughout the country (公敎育强化論). Ultimately, his goals were to dismantle the influences of the Yangban/兩班 figures and powerful landlords(地主) who were pursuing private interests and increasing the level of decentralization(‘分權’) throughout the local regions, and reinforce the government’s official, public and centralized (集權的) power and authority, in order to overcome the national crises that were ravaging the country, with a unified front composed of both the state and the commoners. His suggestions were fresh, and were meaningful.
His suggestions and discussions ended up being integrated into the so-called Shilhak/實學 discussions. Park Ji Gyae’s discussions of ruling with filial piety could be acknowledged as a political discussion that served as the bridge between Neo-Confucian studies(朱子學) and the Shilhak, and it can also be acknowledged as a political discussion that gave birth to the Tangpyeong(蕩平論) discussions of the 18th century.
목차
머리말
1. 인조대 원종추숭(元宗追崇) 논쟁과 효치론(孝治論)
2. 박지계 변통론(變通論)의 내용과 성격
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
21세기에 다시 읽는 실학
대동문화연구
2003 .01
-
Western Science and Shilhak Scholars
Korea Journal
1986 .03
-
사이버대학 영어수업 토론방에서 집단크기에 따른 참여도 차이
영어교과교육
2011 .01
-
토론
어학연구
1982 .12
-
토론
어학연구
1986 .08
-
『조선왕조실록』을 중심으로 본 효치
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
鄭寅普의 茶山-實學 이해에 대한 비판적 검토
역사와실학
2013 .04
-
윤증의 학문과 실학
역사와 담론
2008 .04
-
For the Discussion of Korean Music
Korea Journal
1984 .02
-
고급 단계 한국어 학습자를 위한 토론 수업 방안
이중언어학
2006 .01
-
论韩中实学思潮之异同
한국사상과 문화
2010 .01
-
論評 및 綜合討論
한국독립운동사연구
1992 .12
-
토론 수업의 설계와 운영에 관한 연구 : 논증적 글쓰기를 위하여
수사학
2009 .09
-
문법 토론 학습 활성화 방안 탐색: 온라인 토론과 피드백의 관계를 중심으로
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
종합토론
역사교육
1993 .12
-
종합토론
한국학연구
1995 .12
-
종합토론
한국학연구
1996 .12
-
Two Essays on Filial Piety
Korea Journal
1982 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017324360