메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제17권 제1호
발행연도
2004.4
수록면
97 - 123 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Howard Brenton's main disputation in The Churchill Play, a contribution to the 1974 Churchill centenary, seems to be two-pronged: on the one hand, a criticism of the very process of mythologisation, and on the other, a discussion of the reasons why the Churchill myth holds its repressive and timeless values. Brenton overlaps and juxtaposes three dimensions of historical time: the history of Churchill's England, which is reflected in the Churchill camp prisoners' play; the present of the 1974 audience, which is reflected in the camp prisoners' depressing memories; and the prisoners' present, which is shockingly presented as the audience's future, 1984.
The violent, emotional deconstruction of the war myth has a significant and integral place on the radical agenda of Brenton's drama, and I will not ignore this agitational propagandist element in this paper, which contributes to an emotional attack on the complacent political attitudes of the audience. But my focus here is more on Brenton's self-conscious examination of the work of political drama in a society where even serious theatre is marginalised as recreation. I argue that the play addresses the function of political theatre in a specific social context. It provides an exemplary critique of agitational political theatre.
In the play, Brenton not only attempts to counterpose self-conscious alternative working-class history, but also points out the limitation of the oppositional force's capacity to resist the ideological oppression. When the internees' play-acting is linked to the attempt to escape the camp at the last moment, the internees' play itself becomes a comment on a troubled relationship between the play and the reality, thus standing as an allegory of the function and limitation of political theatre. I conclude that the play is the contradictory expression of a radical dramatist in a conservative political atmosphere, which is increasingly closing down the possibilities for real political change.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The “Resurrected“ Churchill in the Internees‘ Play
Ⅲ. The Continuation of the Churchill Myth: Britain in 1984
Ⅳ. The Internees‘ Play vs. the Internees‘ Reality
Ⅴ. The Internees‘ Play as a Failed Artistic Terrorism
Ⅵ. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015564777