메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제14권 제2호
발행연도
2001.10
수록면
53 - 77 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is threefold: to review R.D.Laing's ideas shown in The Divided Self(1960) and The Politics of Experience(1967), and to analyze Eugene O'Neill's The Great God Brown(1925) by using Laing's concept of "divided self," and then to articulate O'Neill's criticism on American culture.
Laing is known as an existential-phenomenological psychiatrist or an anti-psychiatrist, who denies simply seeing the human being as the product of blind instinctual forces, because the traditional psychiatry's approach to the human being apparently excludes the whole social context in which an individual acts. While Laing in The Divided Self introduces the concepts of "ontological security" and "ontological insecurity" to express the conditions of sanity and insanity, his understanding of sanity and insanity in The Politics of Experience is mainly reflected in his discussion of the "normal" and "abnormal" person in society. Laing's basic ideas for the study of schizophrenia, shown in the two books, reveal that society itself is mad and a sick society makes all individuals helpless victims. For Laing, madness is not a simple mental illness. Laing's interpretation of schizophrenia is reflected in the concepts of "choice" and "being in the world." In other words, the schizophrenic experience, which is charged with existential and social meanings, may be an individual's choice as a way of being-in-the-world to survive in an unlivable situation. In fact, through the two books, Laing questions the actual societal value system on which our notions of "madness" and "normality" are based.
As a mask drama, O'Neill's The Great God Brown investigates the ontological insecurity of modern people by showing the human soul's strangulation by soulless materialism, presenting Laing's ideas. In the play, Dion experiences his ontological insecurity in modern, materialized civilization and faces the real world with his false self in order to protect his vulnerable inner self in an unlivable situation. Asa non-conformist to the established material values, Dion wears the Pan-Mephistophelean mask, his false self. To conceal and to protect his vulnerable inner self as a sensitive and spiritual artist, Dion looks at the world through the Pan-Mephistophelean mask, which the real world requires.
Through Dion's divided self, O'Neill reveals a marked antipathy for American philistinism. Dion's unprotected, spiritual, creative power is completely drained by Brown. However, ironically, while the material Brown has been the good boy, the good friend and the good man, the spiritual Dion has been a cry-baby, a nuisance. Brown's material greed has become the main stream of the American social current. So O'Neill accuses the materialistic, soulless Brown as the destroyer of human spiritual values. Along with Dion's death, Brown's indifference to Dion's spiritual life force means the crisis of modern culture. And, by emphasizing the symbolical breakdown of material culture through the death of Brown as well as the symbolical absence of the human soul through the death of Dion, O'Neill shows modem culture's self-destruction in the play.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015564666