메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
199 - 213 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are two kinds of contract of carriage of goods by sea The one is the voyage charter party and the other is the contract for the carriage of particular goods The voyage charter party is concluded under the equal bargaining power between the carrier and the cargo owner, whereas the contract for the carnage of particular goods is concluded under the unequal bargaining power in favor of the carrier.
The contract for the carriage of particular goods is one of good example of a adhesion contract Therefore, the necessity of protecting the cargo owner is raised. These necessity is embodied in the several international maritime convention such as Hague or Hague-Visby rule The Korean Commercial Code also has a strong provision to protect the cargo owner in the Article 790; Lessening or excluding the carrier's liability will be null and void. From the perspective of the principle of the freedom of contract, it is one example of limiting the principle of the freedom of contract
Recently, new type of the way of the carnage of particular goods brought about It is called as a service contract in the US. The service contract is one type of transportation in the carriage of particular goods. The large and long-tenn cargo owner would make long tenn contract of particular goods with the carrier In this circumstances, the cargo owner rather than the carrier has more bargaining power than the carrier Therefore, there is a movement that the carrier should not be punished by the compulsory provision such as Article 3(8) of Hague-Visby. These ideas are remarkable in the Proposed Revision of U.S COGSA and working group's discussion on the transport law of UNCITRAL The writer suggest that Korean Commercial Code can be reviewed by tills trend, limiting the review to the extent that the protection of the carrier and the cargo owner as well, including the holder of Bill of Lading, remain balanced.

목차

Ⅰ. 序論

Ⅱ. 契約自由의 原則

Ⅲ. 海上運送法에서 契約自由 原則에 대한 制限

Ⅳ. 最近 論議

Ⅴ. 結論

♣ 참고문헌

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014440239