개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine linguistic aspects of fantasy revealed
in figures of speeches, mental spaces, and fictive motions from the viewpoint of
the cognitive linguistic conceptualism, and to give them an cognitive
interpretation. The results are as follows:
First, fantasy or visionality means the fictive, hypothetical, abstract,
subjective, and psychological cognitive mechanism of objects as opposed to
factual, realistic, concrete, objective, and physical one.
Second, metonymy and metaphor have fantasy in that metonymic and
metaphoric expressions cannot be interpreted literally. Metonymy has the
conceptual transfer between the target entity and vehicle entity in the
relationship of contiguity, and metaphor has the conceptual transfer between the source domain and target domain in their relationship of similarity. People deal with a lot of situations with the mechanism of metonymy and metaphor including visionality.
Third, mental spaces have the nature of fantasy as an explanation of the cognitive process caused by linguistic structures in the process of conversation, i.e., as a conceptualization of space building. Mental spaces explain effectively the fantasy of the past, future, and hypothetical situations by creating a new
space in the process of conversation.
Fourth, fictive motion has the nature of fantasy, which gives the meaning hypothetical movement to the stationary objects. Relative motion can be explained with the phenomenon of ‘figure-ground’, and mental or psychological motion can be done with the mechanisms of scanning of information and blended spaces. The production and understanding of such fictive motion is a process of the subjective conceptualization of the conceptualizer.
To sum up, fantasy or visionality revealed in everyday language use may be, on the surface, contradiction and a jump of logic, but it has internal order in the process of its conceptualization in its working aspects, and it is significantly motivated with our experiences.
in figures of speeches, mental spaces, and fictive motions from the viewpoint of
the cognitive linguistic conceptualism, and to give them an cognitive
interpretation. The results are as follows:
First, fantasy or visionality means the fictive, hypothetical, abstract,
subjective, and psychological cognitive mechanism of objects as opposed to
factual, realistic, concrete, objective, and physical one.
Second, metonymy and metaphor have fantasy in that metonymic and
metaphoric expressions cannot be interpreted literally. Metonymy has the
conceptual transfer between the target entity and vehicle entity in the
relationship of contiguity, and metaphor has the conceptual transfer between the source domain and target domain in their relationship of similarity. People deal with a lot of situations with the mechanism of metonymy and metaphor including visionality.
Third, mental spaces have the nature of fantasy as an explanation of the cognitive process caused by linguistic structures in the process of conversation, i.e., as a conceptualization of space building. Mental spaces explain effectively the fantasy of the past, future, and hypothetical situations by creating a new
space in the process of conversation.
Fourth, fictive motion has the nature of fantasy, which gives the meaning hypothetical movement to the stationary objects. Relative motion can be explained with the phenomenon of ‘figure-ground’, and mental or psychological motion can be done with the mechanisms of scanning of information and blended spaces. The production and understanding of such fictive motion is a process of the subjective conceptualization of the conceptualizer.
To sum up, fantasy or visionality revealed in everyday language use may be, on the surface, contradiction and a jump of logic, but it has internal order in the process of its conceptualization in its working aspects, and it is significantly motivated with our experiences.
목차
1. 들머리
2. 비유
3. 정신공간
4. 가상적 이동
5. 마무리
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
허구적 이동의 인지과정
언어과학연구
2012 .03
-
팬터지 가로지르기 : 실재계에 눈뜨기
현대정신분석
2002 .12
-
허구적 이동의 발현 양상 : 영어와 한국어를 중심으로
언어과학연구
2011 .09
-
Fantasy Experience in Homer, Shakespeare, and Shepard
현대영미드라마
2008 .04
-
「박씨전」에 나타난 환상성과 그 의의
우리말글
2004 .04
-
한국 판타지 장르문학의 흐름과 발전 전략 연구
우리문학연구
2011 .10
-
환유와 은유의 인지적 상관성에 관한 연구
언어과학연구
2001 .06
-
한국 판타지 동화 연구
국어교육연구
2008 .02
-
문화콘텐츠산업에서 판타지 문학의 서사 전략과 발전 방안 연구
우리문학연구
2011 .02
-
이상화 시의 환상성 연구
국어국문학
2008 .12
-
이동의 가상적 확장에 대한 연구
담화와인지
2018 .08
-
환유의 경계설정에 관한 연구
영어영문학
2016 .08
-
中國 古代敍事에서의 幻想性 探索 : 生死學的 관점에서
중국어문학논집
2008 .08
-
라캉으로 읽는 <나니아 연대기>
동화와 번역
2007 .01
-
이주 노동(자) 기록의 두 가지 방식 : 환상 공간의 재구축과 파편들의 가시화
현대정신분석
2014 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014333763